So we've seen the new iPhone, and had a chance to briefly play with it at the demo room, but as I've learned in the past so many times you only really know a handset after you've taken a look at the FCC test reports or spent a few days with it yourself. On my flights home, I typed up our iPod and EarBud impressions piece, but also pored over those FCC test reports for the iPhone 5, and it became immediately obvious the iPhone 5 doesn't support simultaneous voice and data on CDMA2000 carriers such as Sprint and Verizon in the US. 

The reasons, as always, are somewhat technical but at a high level pretty simple. Suffice it to say that at a high level this is a design decision which makes the phone as small and light as it is (it really is light, almost alarmingly so) and enables it to support a wide number of LTE bands, rather than some major oversight like I've seen it portrayed. 

First, a bit of overview. At the Apple event there were two physical hardware models for the iPhone 5 announced: A1428 and A1429, with three different provisioning configurations. There are hardware differences between the two models, and what provisioning boils down to is both how the phone is initially provisioned, and likely what AMSS (Advanced Mobile Subscriber Software - Qualcomm's software package that runs on the baseband) gets loaded at boot. This is analogous to how with iPhone 4S there was a single hardware model, but two different configurations for CDMA and GSM. 

For the most part, the two hardware models are identical, and to most users the two models will be indistinguishable, but there are physical differences to accommodate a number of different LTE bands between the two. The Apple iPhone 5 specs page lists this at a high level, and there's an even more explicit LTE specific page with a list of what LTE bands work for what carriers. Of course, what ultimately really matters is what's in the FCC docs and in the hardware, and looking at those there are a few more bands supported than listed for LTE.

Why this is the case is interesting and a function of transceiver and Apple's implementation – with Qualcomm's transceivers (specifically RTR8600 in the iPhone 5, but this applies to others as well), each "port" is created equal, and can handle WCDMA or LTE equally. If your design includes the right power amplifiers (PA), filters, and antenna tuning, you're good to go, which is why we see LTE testing reports for bands that aren't listed otherwise. I saw this same behavior with Apple's test reports for the iPad 3 with LTE as well, there were many more tested configurations than what any carrier in the USA will run, but remember Apple's approach is about covering as many possible configurations as possible with the fewest number of SKUs.

I've made a table of what the cellular band support breakdown is for the three iPhone 5 configurations:

Apple iPhone 5 Models
iPhone 5 Model GSM/EDGE Bands WCDMA Bands CDMA 1x/EVDO Rev.A/B Bands LTE Bands (FCC+Apple)
A1428 "GSM" 850/900/1800/1900 MHz 850/900/1900/2100 MHz N/A 2/4/5/17
A1429 "CDMA" 850/900/1800/1900 MHz 850/900/1900/2100 MHz 800/1900/2100 MHz 1/3/5/13/25
A1429 "GSM" 850/900/1800/1900 MHz 850/900/1900/2100 MHz NA 1/3/5 (13/25 unused)

Note that we now have both quad band GSM/EDGE and WCDMA across all three models. All three configurations support WCDMA with up to HSDPA Category 24 (DC-HSPA+ with 64QAM for 42 Mbps downlink) and HSUPA Category 6 (5.76 Mbps uplink) as far as I'm aware. Only the A1429 "CDMA" configuration supports CDMA2000 1x and EVDO, and interestingly enough even supports EVDO Rev.B which includes carrier aggregation, though no carrier in the USA will ever run it.  In addition the FCC reports include 1xAdvanced testing and certification for CDMA Band Classes 0 (800 MHz), 1 (1900 MHz), and 10 (Secondary 800 MHz), so I have no idea why Sprint is saying it won't work with their "HD Voice" (really 1xAdvanced) deployment, but I'm digressing yet again... 

Looking at just the LTE band numbers is hard unless you have them internalized, so I made yet another table which focuses just on that aspect:

Apple iPhone LTE Band Coverage
E-UTRA (LTE) Band Number Applicable iPhone Model Commonly Known Frequency (MHz) Bandwidths Supported (MHz)
1 A1429 2100 20, 15, 10, 5  (?)
2 A1428 1900 20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4
3 A1429 1800 20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4 (?)
4 A1428 1700/2100 20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4
5 A1428, A1429 850 10, 5, 3, 1.4
13 A1429 700 Upper C 10, 5
17 A1428 700 Lower B/C 10, 5
25 A1429 1900 20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4

So you can see how with two different hardware models, Apple is able to support no fewer than 8 LTE bands with largely the same hardware – the same display, chassis, battery, form factor, and PCB outline (different power amplifiers and filters are required), and roughly the same exterior antennas (gain is different on the primary bottom antenna between the two models, no doubt they're tuned differently). Previously most handsets I've seen have been destined to work only on a single carrier, and thus implement at most one or two LTE bands. 

If you look at Apple's iPhone lineup historically, there's this obvious two year cadence which jumps out at you, and it applies even to cellular. I've removed the CPU and GPU parts so this table doesn't get too huge, but historically Apple has been very careful about engineering a platform that will last for a while. 

Apple iPhone - Cellular Trends
  Release Year Industrial Design Cellular Baseband Cellular Antennas
iPhone 2007 1st gen Infineon S-Gold 2 1
iPhone 3G 2008 2nd gen Infineon X-Gold 608 1
iPhone 3GS 2009 2nd gen Infineon X-Gold 608 1
iPhone 4 (GSM/UMTS) 2010 3rd gen Infineon X-Gold 618 1
iPhone 4 (CDMA) 2011 3rd gen Qualcomm MDM6600 2
(Rx diversity, No Tx diversity)
iPhone 4S 2011 3rd gen Qualcomm MDM6610 (MDM6600 w/ ext. trans) 2
(2 Rx/1 Tx diversity)
iPhone 5 2012 4th gen Qualcomm MDM9615 w/RTR8600 ext. trans 2
(2 Rx/1 Tx diversity)

It was touched on in the keynote, but the iPhone 5 likewise inherits the two-antenna cellular design that was touted from the 4S. This is the original mitigation for iPhone 4 "deathgrip" which was introduced somewhat quietly in the iPhone 4 (CDMA), and carried over to the 4S with one additional improvement – the phone included a double pole, double throw switch which allowed it to change which antenna was used for transmit as well to completely quash any remaining unwarranted attenuation. While receive diversity was a great extra for the 4S that drastically improved cellular performance at cell edges, in LTE 2-antenna receive diversity is now thankfully mandatory, leaving the base LTE antenna configuration a two-antenna setup (two Rx, one shared for Tx). Thankfully, Apple already had that antenna architecture worked out with the 4S, and carried it over to the iPhone 5. 

So now that we're done with all that, where the heck does simultaneous voice and data fit into the picture? Again, it comes down to antennas, design decisions, and band support.

First a bit of history: first generation LTE phones on Verizon used a combination of two cellular architectures to deliver both LTE and CDMA1x/EVDO capabilities. Quite literally there were two basebands, two transmit chains, and at least three antennas: a two-antenna setup for LTE, and 1 transmit for CDMA 1x/EVDO duties. Usually this boiled down to a shared diversity receive antenna for LTE and CDMA 1x/EVDO, and discrete transmit antennas for LTE and CDMA1x/EVDO.


Samsung Galaxy S 3 for VZW (SCH-I535) antennas (3 for cellular)

Modernizations from Qualcomm have since reduced the number of digital basebands required to just one (with MSM8960 and MDM9x15) which helped improve battery life, but the end implementation still requires the same three-antenna solution. This configuration enables both SVLTE (simultaneous voice and LTE) and SVDO (simultaneous voice and EVDO) with one modem but still requires those two transmit RF chains to work for CDMA phones. I should mention that these methods are all in place to accommodate the fact that as of yet almost no CDMA networks implement VoLTE (Voice over LTE or Voice over IMS), except MetroPCS. To make this single radio simultaneous LTE and CDMA architecture work requires making another RF path. 

On WCDMA/GSM carriers, the path forward until we get to VoLTE is what's called circuit-switched fallback (CS-FB). This quite literally means you drop from 4G LTE to 3G WCDMA (where voice and data are already multiplexed) for the call, then hand back up to LTE when you're finished. This is the way that voice works at the moment for all GSM/WCDMA carriers, and on all those handsets with LTE to date.


From iPhone 5's FCC Test Reports

So onto the iPhone – we know definitively that the iPhone 5 definitely doesn't support either SVDO or SVLTE. It's as simple as looking at the FCC documents and the appropriate sections in the allowed and tested simultaneous transmitters section for SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) testing. There, it's spelled out that only one air interface can be active at a time, and that only one antenna can be selected for transmit at a time. There's also an explicitly called out mention to VoLTE not being supported at present. I didn't replicate the entire table of simultaneous transmission combinations which need to be tested (it is a huge table) there are no entries with CDMA Voice being active at the same time as any data mode save WiFi. This has been confirmed as well by later statements by the carriers and Apple. 

From Apple's perspective, no doubt the iPhone 5 not supporting simultaneous voice and data on CDMA carriers isn't the end of the world. After all, iPhone 4 and 4S customers have ostensibly been using their phones without that functionality just fine for some time now – this is just a logical extension. At the same time, LTE handsets on Verizon and Sprint which currently support both SVDO and SVLTE will have a differentiator, and from what I've been told the inclusion of SVDO is more of a "delighter" than core feature. 

What it really boils down to is that by using this single Tx chain, Apple is able to support a ton of LTE bands (more space for PAs and fewer transceiver ports used on SVLTE for CDMA networks) and also do it without making the iPhone very large. Moving to an architecture that works with SVDO and SVLTE would require an additional transmit path and antenna, and incur a size and weight penalty. The other reality is that CS-FB is the way voice coexists with LTE in the vast majority of cases globally, and thus engineering all that just for CDMA networks is at odds with Apple's ultimate desire to deliver as few models as possible. 

In the future all of this overhead to implement voice with legacy 3G and 2G networks will largely go away and exist only as a handover option for when LTE service isn't available. Voice over LTE is indeed coming soon. 

Update: The other LTE related iPhone 5 thing to explain is why LTE support for 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz isn't present. This article originally started as an explanation for why SVLTE and SVDO support are not absent, I think there's even more discussion necessary about what the likely plan of attack from Apple is for including both more LTE bands and that TD-SCDMA phone for China. I plan to address that in our upcoming review. 

POST A COMMENT

89 Comments

View All Comments

  • Impulses - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    I was kinda jazzed about it when I got my EVO 4G LTE but to be honest I don't think I've taken advantage of it very often... And I have noticed that sometimes the data connection drops while on a call regardless, I imagine it has something to do with network conditions. Also, Airaves don't seem to support SVDO at all. Reply
  • Brian Klug - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    I test SVDO on new 4G LTE handsets, it was originally pretty cool with the HTC Thunderbolt, now it's kind of a given. I regret not testing it at the Apple event, but the only Verizon iPhone 5 I saw is the one in the picture (seriously).

    -Brian
    Reply
  • bobbozzo - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    I just got an AirRave and was told they don't have 4G at all.
    I don't think SVDO is possible (on Sprint phones at least) without 4G.
    Of course if you have an AirRave nearby, you probably have WiFi too.
    Reply
  • UsernameAlreadyExists - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    So why doesn't your product has a feature x that some of your competitors have?

    "The reasons, as always, are somewhat technical but at a high level pretty simple. Suffice it to say that at a high level this is a design decision which makes the software as small and light as it is (it really is light, the codebase almost alarmingly so) and enables it to support a wide number of features, rather than some major oversight like I've seen it portrayed. "

    Well yes, there are differences between software and hardware. But this decision does not exactly allow for wider number of LTE channels than other solutions, like I've seen it portrayed (here).
    Reply
  • lowlymarine - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    Hey, now you're ready to be an Arch dev! "It's not a flaw, it's a feature!" Reply
  • ananduser - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    To cut corners that's why. It wouldn't kill anyone if the iphone was a little fatter. This is a device limitation. Add that to the fact that it won't support Vodafone's 4G in the UK next year. Now we can say that the "world phone" status is false advertisement. Reply
  • huh!! - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    So it's not a world phone because it doesn't support a network that currently doesn't work or exist? Think about your requirement's for "world phone" status for a second, and consider if you would be applying to any other phone that isn't called Iphone. Reply
  • ratte - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    800 MHz and 2.6 GHz LTE do exist and work in europe.
    Sweden has it but is probably to small a market to count.

    Looking forward to the review and further explanations to why it isn't in Iphone5
    Reply
  • Leonick - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    Sweden seem to be big enough a market for Apple to start opening up their own stores. You probably can't just get every piece of frequency working just like that. Reply
  • mcnabney - Friday, September 14, 2012 - link

    Yes.

    Phones aren't just designed to work with what is available at the moment of release. They are designed to take advantage of scheduled changes and improvements. For example, Verizon just got a ton of new higher frequency spectrum from the cable companies and they plan to use it to expand LTE capacity. LTE currently runs at 700mhz, but the new frequencies are over a ghz. The iPhone should have those frequencies tunable, because they will be in use very shortly.
    Not being designed around pending technology changes means that they are outdated at launch.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now