Conclusion: P8Z77-V Premium

The striking feature regarding the ASUS P8Z77-V Premium, at least from my perspective, is the price.  We very rarely see motherboards costing more than the CPU for a given range (Sandy Bridge-E top chip is $999, top motherboard costs <$600).  However, the P8Z77-V Premium comes in at an MSRP of $450 US.  That is a lot of green, and ASUS have attempted to match the cost with the feature set.

As specified in the review, we have a wealth of additional functionality on the P8Z77-V Premium.  Here are my estimates for the costs of individual parts:

- Dual Intel NIC ($20 combined)
- 32GB LiteOn mSATA SSD ($60)
- PLX PEX 8747 ($40)
- WiFi and Bluetooth module ($40)
- Thunderbolt ($40)
- Marvell 9230 controller for 4 SATA 6 Gbps ports ($20)
- Included USB 3.0 Front box ($20)
- iNetwork Control ($15)
- Fan Xpert II Software (comparable $50 controller would not give similar options)
- USB 3.0 Boost + Specific ASMedia controller ($15)
- ASUS Premium Service (for North American customers) (??)

Totaling these up (please note, these are my own interpretations) would come to $320 – a sizable sum which would pay for three low cost Z77 boards by itself!  Removing these would come to $130, or the rough price of the P8Z77-V LX.  A lot of research and development goes into many of these features (such as the Marvell controllers have PCIe x2 interconnect, or the research/development to put the WiFi module onto the backplane as a card rather than an x1 addition) which we cannot quantify.  This puts the Premium at good value for the features it provides.

All of this adds a cost to the production of the motherboard, which is passed on to the consumer.  The question does become whether there exists a single consumer that can make use of all these, or whether ASUS should filter most of these features into specific individual SKUs.  The other argument is that for a top end board, a user would like to have the option to be able to use everything.  So as long as the user can use every single one of the above options, then this would make the Premium an excellent buy (assuming all else is equal).  Otherwise, we come up against the Luxury car scenario.  Nevertheless, ASUS tell me that during the first three months of the X79 release, the Rampage IV Extreme was their best selling X79 board, despite being the most expensive and having a range of included features that many of the users on the board would not consider using.  Therefore, despite what common sense from a reviewer's perspective may believe, expensive boards can sell well.

In terms of performance, with the ASUS P8Z77-V Premium being the first motherboard we have tested with the PLX PEX 8747 chip, we were a little down-heartened when the initial single GPU results were in.  However, it does seem to be on par with other boards using this chip, meaning that these motherboards strictly aim at the two or more GPU user.  Having four high end AMD GPUs running in this board was great fun, until I put the fans on full.  Using a single 2560x1440 monitor at the highest settings, we reached almost 230 FPS in Dirt3 in this setup.

In our throughput testing, ASUS pulls no punches in fully utilizing MultiCore Enhancement, resulting in the full turbo mode of the processor no matter what the loading.  As a result, our CPU tests are in the top echelons.  IO testing benefits from having a Thunderbolt port, in the sense that any Thunderbolt device will happily smash all our USB 3.0 testing.  The Thunderbolt port also supports an extra DP monitor through the connection with an Ivy Bridge CPU.

Power consumption on the P8Z77-V Premium was a little higher than expected.  This motherboard uses a 20-phase solution for the CPU power, which may contribute to the extra power draw (27W in Metro2033 over the ASUS P8Z77-V Pro).  Though given the nature of the board, power draw is probably the least point of concern on a users mind.

The Premium does have an awesome POST time.  In our testing, ASUS Z77 boards have typically scored around 18 seconds, and 15 when controllers are disabled.  The Premium steams in at 10.44 seconds to finish the POST, cruising ahead of many ASRock motherboards.  For a motherboard that has all this extra functionality, ASUS have played the tweaking game to make this an ultra fast startup board in our testing.  This is reflected in the BIOS, which is easy to use for beginners and enthusiasts alike.

The lynchpin of the Premium comes down to the price.  Yes, it is a good board and it works well, but when I review a motherboard I have to take into account the user base which coincides with the intended market.  I highly doubt that a single user will ever utilize all the additional functionality listed above, which means that there will always be one extra bit of kit that the user does not need.  This is despite ASUS informing me that their most feature rich and expensive X79 motherboard was their best X79 seller, even if the end users were not entirely the intended market.

That makes the Premium a very confusing motherboard for critics like me to recommend.  Perhaps this calls in an analogy of high-end luxury model cars - while no-one would necessarily use the 6.0 liter V12 in a Maybach 62 to its fullest potential, or even the CD changer if they already have a music playing device, it is there if required.  But should we be awarding the luxury cars for pushing the boundaries, or awarding the hot hatchbacks for being worthy of the bang-for-buck mentality?

The ASUS P8Z77-V Premium is an easy board to recommend if you are a multi PCIe device user, you have Thunderbolt devices, need dual Intel NICs as well as WiFi, and want to equip your system with SATA and USB 3.0 storage. The ASUS P8Z77-V Premium represents the all-in-one, top of the line solution.

 

Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • ptrinh1979 - Tuesday, August 14, 2012 - link

    I was confused as well, but in my case, I can use this to offload the pagefile without sacrificing a drive bay in my chassis.
  • BytesMage - Tuesday, September 11, 2012 - link

    Page file is good for this. Planning on raiding 2 SSDs in raid 0 on Intel then SSD cache ll on the marvel with 2 60gb SSDs to 3tb HDD. I was wondering what to do with the 32gb mSata.
  • ASUSTechMKT - Tuesday, August 14, 2012 - link

    The 32GB mSATA was integrated to allow for quick access to utilizing Intel SSD Caching functionality. While many users are adopting high performance SSDs the cost of higher capacities is till high and in addition limited. Mechanical drives still considerably outpace and outsell SSDs in integration in all price points of desktops. Having this 32GB drive integrated easily allows for you to "SSD Cache a 2, 3 or 4TB drive" this allows you to have a much smoother and quicker response experience from the mechanical volume.

    While not noted the setup has also been streamlined in our utility to allow for a quick one click level of initialization for Intel SSD Caching or ASUS SSD Caching from the Marvell controller.
  • Rick83 - Monday, August 13, 2012 - link

    At this price point, that is fairly ridiculous.

    So yes, there is "Thunderbolt", but a Firewire 800 Controller would probably be more useful, as there are way more Firewire devices in the wild than Thunderbolt.

    Not sure how much the 82579V really can be called "server grade" either.
    The 82579V on the Gene-Z shouldn't be all that different, having the same designation, but you have to manually hack the .inf to get the driver to install on Windows server. Not sure what makes this one server grade, seeing as the broken .inf comes directly from Intel.

    Checking the other NIC, that one is more likely to be server grade, it costs almost twice as much. Not sure who made that mix-up.
  • IanCutress - Monday, August 13, 2012 - link

    This was my error. The 82583 is not server grade, but as a helpful reader pointed out via email, the 82571, 82572, 82574, 82576, 82580 and I350 are. Super helpful naming scheme to tell them apart... :)

    Ian
  • Googer - Monday, August 13, 2012 - link

    Thunderbolt is capable if mimicking firewire and just about every other IO technology in existence. So there is no real need for the added PCB Real Estate or monetary expense of a 1394 chip when 1394b is something that never really caught on (SAD).
  • bigboxes - Tuesday, August 14, 2012 - link

    Give up on the firewire. It's got USB 3.0. & USB 2.0. Anything you might need beyond that will either be Thunderbolt or some future USB 4.0. I've never needed Firewire. I've wasted money on a Firewire card, but that's not the same thing as needing it, now is it?
  • Rick83 - Tuesday, August 14, 2012 - link

    There's a lot of Firewire Video stuff (I'm following the IEEE1394-Linux mailing list, and there is still development and occasional use in a variety of contexts) Also I have a FireWire CF-reader. Not to mention that it's still much cheaper than TB, and in the shape of FW-800 still bloody fast, thanks to physical DMA.

    Also, at 450 euro, there's just no reason not to mark that check-box. Thunderbird is NOT a drop-in replacement. It's not like there's no space left on the back plane.

    I actually had a look at the P8C WS yesterday evening, and it seems that that board is what this board should be, at half the price.

    Two server grade NICs, FireWire, DVI out, support for ECC MEM and Xeons.
    No WiFi, Thunderbolt, SSD or PLX though, but then those are probably less useful to (me and) most people, than the aforementioned.
    Oh and it has 4x SATA less. But then 10x SATA is what my much cheaper GigaByte P55-UD5 has, and had years ago (Yes, they're all in use - Yes I'm looking at the WS because I've been having issues (kernel panics, NICs misbehaving) with it lately and server NICs and ECC probably are a good idea after all)
  • BoloMKXXVIII - Monday, August 13, 2012 - link

    I have to agree with others who are a bit confused why a 32 GB SSD was included. As for the rest of the board, I will keep an eye out for when this board starts dropping in price. It is bound to happen. As long as it doesn't take too long it could fit well into my near future plans.
  • Kristian Vättö - Monday, August 13, 2012 - link

    Any idea how the Marvell 9230 SATA 6Gbps controller performs? Marvell's previous controllers haven't been too great, so I'm curious to know if the 9230 is any better.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now