Conclusion: Just Because You Can Doesn't Mean You Should

Joking about the Lian Li PC-A55's unfortunate nomenclature aside, this was an extremely unpleasant review to write. A bad review can be fun for the end user to read, but snark comes cheaply and people put time and energy into designing and producing this case. People that I have to answer to, and people that I want to encourage. Lian Li's case designers seldom seem particularly bound by convention, and sometimes that results in some really stellar designs.

I was personally very impressed with the PC-90, a case not too much larger than the PC-A55 with absolutely stellar thermal performance. I didn't like how drives were mounted inside the case, but Lian Li was able to produce an HPTX-capable case in roughly the same dimensions as a standard ATX case from a competitor. Not just that, but it also offered better thermal performance than most of the competition.

Fitting an HPTX build in an ATX form factor and having it run efficiently is something I can see as having some real merit, even in corner cases. Yet when you try to fit an ATX build into a Micro-ATX form factor, thermal performance becomes substantially more important. We're at a juncture now where there are very few reasons to go with an ATX motherboard over a Micro-ATX board. One of those is if you're putting together a multi-GPU system, and that's a use case you can throw right out the window with the PC-A55 due to the way the cooling is engineered. With that out of the way, I see very little reason to go with an ATX motherboard if it can be avoided. Motherboards are so fully-featured at this point that expansion cards just aren't as relevant as they used to be.

In the end, the PC-A55's cooling design is fundamentally and fatally flawed. Adjusting orientation of fans and cooling inside the case wouldn't be optimization, it would be damage control. The graphics card is basically fighting for air with the power supply, and the CPU heatsink is essentially almost completely choked off from fresh air. Even with the bottom-mounted intake clear, thermals don't improve enough to justify going with the PC-A55 over a similarly sized Micro-ATX enclosure.

So how do you improve the PC-A55? Unfortunately it's difficult to do so without increasing the dimensions of the enclosure. If we're going to stick with having a bottom-mounted intake fan, we need to raise the case off the ground high enough that it doesn't matter what surface it's on and we need to make sure cool air can easily get inside the case. One of the biggest issues is the orientation of the motherboard; bottom to top airflow works in other cases because there's a nice channel for the air to flow through, cooling the CPU, GPU, and other components in the process. If Lian Li wants to do bottom and top mounted fans, the motherboard has to be rotated ninety degrees for it to work effectively. The vertical power supply mount also needs to be flipped 180 degrees and then the front panel of the enclosure needs ventilation for the PSU. And after we've made all these changes, we're basically left with...a Silverstone case.

Ultimately I feel like all Lian Li's engineers have done with the PC-A55 is prove that they could make a small case that could still support a full ATX motherboard. In the process, we lose a tremendous amount of thermal efficiency and acoustics go up catastrophically as a result. What are we left with? Unfortunately, a case I can't find any argument for.

Noise and Thermal Testing, Overclocked
Comments Locked

64 Comments

View All Comments

  • Iketh - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    I already have 3 HDDs installed, why do I need the cage?
  • Iketh - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    BTW, that's a passively cooled 2600k @ 4.3GHz at 79C with prime load WITH THE DOORS OFF

    however, evo + 2600k is lapped
  • Olaf van der Spek - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    Passive? As in no fans at all?

    Without the cage the case looks good.
  • wifiwolf - Sunday, June 17, 2012 - link

    Doesn't seem right to passively cool the cpu and have fan in the front and back.
    The noise will still be there, having a low noise cpu fan there wouldn't add any noticeable noise
  • Iketh - Sunday, June 17, 2012 - link

    then i guess when i tested the noise levels with and without and found a very noticeable improvement, i must be absolutely incompetent to make the judgement... thank you for showing me the path wifiwolf
  • doctormonroe - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    PC-X500/PC-X500FX in the mATX formfactor would be brilliant, hopefully it would be cheaper as well...
  • etamin - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    I've been wondering why Lian Li (or any other company) hasn't employed the 90 degree rotated design that Silverstone uses. Is it under patent protection?
  • InterClaw - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    It seems like a major mistake to not let the PSU get its own air from the front, especially since it dumps its hot air at the bottom of the case. The way it is now it just recycles its own hot air. Genius... This is beside all the other cooling problems what with the GFX blocking the flow.

    Dustin, I'm curious though why you mounted the CPU cooler horizontally and not vertically to help the airflow along. Was it not possible or is that deviating from the testing methodology since the heat sink might perform differently after being reseated?
  • RanDum72 - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    I cannot believe that the case designers never thought about where the PSU exhaust is going to come out. The heat generated by the PSU is dumped inside the case. They could have drilled some holes that aligns with the PSU exhaust but even that will also be picked up by the bottom fan and thrown back into the case. All form, no function.
  • kesbar - Saturday, June 16, 2012 - link

    after looking at the thermal results, the PC-A55 has carpet burn.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now