We tested RAID-1 rebuild after removing the drive in the first slot. Physically, the unit was able to indicate operation in degraded mode by turning the LED light above the bay from blue to red. Also, the front light turned red. Unfortunately, the NAS webpage offered no indication of operation in degraded mode on the first page. However, the RAID Management page correctly indicated the RAID status and the affected disk bay. The option to set up a SMTP account (which can be used for email alerts) is also available.

LaCie 2big NAS RAID-1 Volume Rebuild
2 x 3TB RAID-1 Rebuild after Single Hard Drive Failure 06:02:35

The power consumed by the unit at the wall under various NAS operating modes is provided in the table below. 2-bay ARM-based NAS units from other vendors have a similar power consumption profile.

LaCie 2big NAS (6 TB) Power Consumption
Deep Sleep 1.2 W
Idle 7.7 W
100% Writes (IOMeter) in RAID-1 22.3 W
RAID-1 Rebuild 24.9 W

In terms of price, the LaCie 2big NAS slots in between the Netgear Duo v2 and the Synology DS211+. The available features are in line with the pricing. While the Netgear model doesn't have official support for NFS or iSCSI (slated to appear in one of the upcoming firmware releases), the LaCie 2big NAS model supports them at launch. On the other hand, the DS211+ has 256 MB of DRAM extra, and is able to offer more features such as multiple iSCSI targets. These factors lead us to conclude that the LaCie 2big NAS model is not overpriced for its feature set. The performance of the unit is acceptable when the price is taken into account.

Towards the end of the testing process, we tried to check out how the unit would behave when starting in diskless mode. After removing the drives and removing the partitions by connecting them to a PC, we put the drives in the NAS and expected the unit to appear on the network. However, the 2big NAS behaves quite differently. LaCie has a quick install guide, but it just goes to show that the unit is not as user friendly as it can be. Basically, in diskless mode, the unit can't be accessed over the network (unlike other NASes we have evaluated).

LaCie definitely needs to work on augmenting the LaCie NAS OS 2 feature set. Hiding away the capabilities of the system (including the failure to provide SSH / root access for advanced users) under the pretext of maintaining the reliability and performance of the NAS doesn't count as an acceptable excuse. In addition, the hard drive temperatures and S.M.A.R.T. status don't seem to be available to the users.

We haven't touched upon the LaCie MyNAS app available for iOS. LaCie gives more attention to Apple users, which is understandable given their target market. An Android version would definitely help broaden the appeal of the 2big NAS.

In conclusion, the LaCie 2big NAS will keep their existing users happy and may tempt them to upgrade. However, for advanced users who want to extend their NAS's capabilities, the Netgear Duo v2 presents a cheaper option and the Synology DS2xx+ lineup offers more features for a higher price. That said, depending on the usage scenario, the industrial design and the acoustics might give the 2big NAS model an edge under certain circumstances.
 

Linux Performance : NFS and CIFS
Comments Locked

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • DukeRobillard22 - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    The question I always have about a NAS, and which is hard to find out, is "what filesystem does it use?" Like, when its power supply dies, can I pull one of the mirrored disks out, plug it into a SATA port on my Linux box, and get at the data? While it's true the the disks themselves are probably the mostly likely thing to fail, they're not the only thing.

    Currently, I use an old PC running Fedora with software RAID, just so I can do that when some piece of hardware lets out the magic smoke.
  • KLC - Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - link

    Every time I read an NAS review I'm struck by how expensive they are. More than 2 years ago I bought an Acer Windows Home Server box. It has 4 hot swappable drive bays, an atom processor with 1 gb of memory and Windows Home Server V1. With one 1tb drive it cost me $350 on sale, regular price was $399. Two years later and I see systems with less capability than that one yet they are much more expensive. Why do NAS systems defy Moore's law of more computing capability for less money over time?
  • EddieBoy - Wednesday, May 30, 2012 - link

    I keep thinking that I need something to replace my aging Windows Home Server setup. This looks like it might do the trick.

    But now I am concerned about the Seagate acquisition and whether that might affect their quality and customer support.

    Any thoughts on how the acquisition might affect this company?

    Thanks.
  • Zak - Sunday, June 3, 2012 - link

    Do these overheat and fry their electronics like most of LaCie enclosures?
  • klassobanieras - Tuesday, June 12, 2012 - link

    As the owner of a 4-disk ReadyNAS NV I always felt quite smug about my data until the box itself went bad. This taught me to ask certain awkward questions:
    - What if the box fails? Do I need to buy another identical box to get my data off my disks or will (e.g.) a Linux machine understand them ok?
    - Is it susceptible to the RAID write-hole? Do I need a UPS?
    - What kind of data-integrity does it provide, relative to the state-of-the-art (ZFS, btrfs et al)?

    Respectfully, I'd suggest that if you're going to seriously test NASes you need to (a) repeatedly yank the power-cord in the middle of metadata-heavy writes, (b) try getting your data off the disks without the use of the NAS itself, (c) see how it deals with a flaky drive and (d) test for data integrity, not just filesystem integrity.

    Finally, NASes should be judged in the context of what you can get from an el-cheapo PC running FreeNAS with ZFS, which IMHO puts most consumer NAS boxes to shame.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now