Going Into the Pixel: Retina Display Under a Microscope

If we take a few (or an order of magnitude) more steps closer to the display and put it under the microscope we can get an even better appreciation for exactly what Samsung (and Apple's other display vendors) have done with the creation of this panel. Below are shots at 50x magnification of the display from the iPad 2, new iPad, ASUS TF Prime and iPhone 4S, organized from lowest to highest DPI:


Apple iPad 2, 1024 x 768, 9.7-inches


ASUS Eee Pad Transformer Prime, 1280 x 800, 10.1-inches


Apple iPad Retina Display (2012), 2048 x 1536, 9.7-inches


Apple iPhone 4S, 960 x 640, 3.5-inches

What you're looking at here are shots of the three subpixels for each pixel. Subpixel shapes will vary by panel type/manufacturer (hence the iPhone 4S vs. iPad subpixel structure), but the increase in density is tremendous.

Pixel Density Quantifying Display Performance: Big Gamut Gains
POST A COMMENT

172 Comments

View All Comments

  • AnnihilatorX - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    While the iPad 2 and TF Prime both were able to represent ~40% of the Adobe RGB color gamut, the new iPad jumps by nearly 50% to representing 65% of the Adobe RGB gamut.


    You shouldn't really say that. The jump from 40% to 65% is 20%, not 50%
    Don't mix percentile with relative ratios.
    Reply
  • doobydoo - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    When you start out at 40%, of anything, if you see a 20% improvement compared to that 40% starting point, you end up at 48%.

    Using percentages is correct, you just have to know what is a percentage of what, which admittedly should have been made clearer.

    It would have been more incorrect to say the iPad had improved by 20% when that would imply it hasn't made as much of an improvement as it has.
    Reply
  • doobydoo - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    (To be clear, a percentage is a relative ratio. % = / 100 ) Reply
  • Origin32 - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    I hate it when people don't distinguish between percents and percent points. /petpeeve
    3rd alinea 3rd page I'm glad you asked
    Reply
  • guidryp - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    "While it's still no where near the quality of high-end PC displays"

    In what way? I have an NEC 2490 high end PC display (> $1000).

    In most ways the new ipad display equals or betters it.

    I hope Anand hasn't fallen into the trap thinking that Wider gamut = better.

    There really is only one gamut standard in wide use and that is sRGB. Any deviation falling short(as old iPad did), or going beyond sRGB will produce less accurate color in most situations.

    This display is as close to sRGB as I have seen in any monitor. Since that is actually the proper target to aim for (not simply wider = better), they have done an exemplary job.
    Reply
  • medi01 - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    On other tablets, Samsung's Galaxy in particular? (only 3 were shown in chart) Reply
  • medi01 - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    I guess I know why it isn't shown:

    Gamut of Adobe RGB 1998
    iPad 2 - 49.9%
    iPad 3 - 66%
    Galaxy Tab 10.1 - 62.8%
    Transformer Prime (SuperIPS Off) - 40.2%

    So older Galaxy Tab has much better color gamut than iPad2 and is very close to iPad3.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ipad-3-benchma...
    Reply
  • midori - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    @anand:
    I think we all saw enough of photos from microscopes and magnifying glass.
    I don't really see a reason in posting comparison photos that are so "close" and zoomed in.
    That just isn't real world scenario. We all get get that the screen has 4X pixel count but post comparison photos from normal usage distance. That way I can really see if I can benefit from all those extra pixels or not.
    Reply
  • Graag - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    The problem with normal size comparison photos is that they will generally be viewed on monitors with less than the iPad's resolution. Making it difficult to really tell the difference. Sort of how it would be hard to evaluate color TVs by looking at them on a B&W TV. Reply
  • uhuznaa - Tuesday, March 20, 2012 - link

    One thing that would be really useful would be full-size screenshots of an iPad 2 and an iPad 3 displaying the same book-sized PDF.

    Especially PDFs are terrible on the older iPad. I mean, there're lots of really good apps for working with them, but the need to constantly zoom around is just maddening. The new display should really help here a lot.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now