Conclusion: Reliability Above All Else

Taken at face value, the Puget Systems Obsidian is a reasonably solid enterprise-class tower. The very basic configuration keeps costs, power consumption, heat, and noise incredibly low. This is due at least in part to the choice of the Antec Mini P180, which is actually a recent development: older Obsidian machines were built in the Silverstone TJ08. That wasn't exactly a problematic chassis to begin with as Silverstone's cases tend to be fairly well built, smartly engineered, and reasonably priced. The move to the Mini P180 just makes the Obsidian that much quieter, and at least anecdotal experience with Antec suggests replacement parts are extremely easy to come by.

The devil with the Obsidian is, of course, in the details. All told, our review configuration runs about $800 if you buy the parts from NewEgg. Tack a Windows 7 Professional 64-bit license on and you're looking at about $940. That means Puget is making roughly $400 off of systems configured like our review unit. Admittedly that feels a little dicey and is liable to give one pause, but it's important to keep in mind the kind of research and careful engineering that goes into this line specifically, along with the extra service of having an advance spare on hand at all times. This system is intended for business/enterprise customers and there's always a premium to be paid for that.

We do have a few concerns with the targeted business/enterprise customers, however. First, we wonder how many businesses actually want to use this size of desktop tower. Yes, the Antec Mini P180 is a great chassis, but it's also far larger than what most businesses need. If your company wants to add a discrete GPU, that's an option, but there are definitely companies that would rather have PCs that are less than half the size of the Obisidian (and still quiet under most workloads). The second issue is the default warranty. You can tell us that your parts are highly reliable and there's a hot-spare on hand for advance replacement, but given the $400 markup we'd suggest that a 3-year parts warranty should come standard. That's what Dell and HP do for their business PCs, and if you want a piece of that pie you need to compete on all fronts.

Add in the 3-year warranty and our Obsidian review system will set you (or your business) back over $1600. Dell's OptiPlex 990 with similar options will cost around $1100 (using the current and frequently available "instant savings"). The HP Compaq 8200 Elite is priced similar to Dell at $1050. Puget Systems may use a higher quality case with cooling that will run quiet even under heavy loads, and their component choices may be more reliable, but you're paying a substantial premium.

Ultimately, taken at face value the information we've seen from Puget Systems indicates their Obsidian is a highly reliable build that would be ideal for mission critical situations. Yes, you can easily use their research to build your own system using the same parts for a lot less money, but then you're stuck with internal support should a problem arise. It's not the fastest computer on the block and certainly it's unfair to place it in a performance race against the hardcore gaming machines we've compared it to. Puget also provides more customization options that larger OEMs should you have special needs--and that's one area where the P180 chassis is a real benefit. The care that has gone into its design along with the virtually silent operation and excellent service make the Puget Systems Obsidian easy to recommend for business users, provided they can stomach the price.

Build, Noise, Heat, and Power Consumption
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dustin Sklavos - Monday, April 11, 2011 - link

    We're actually working on getting enterprise-class desktops in for review right now.
  • robbster - Monday, April 11, 2011 - link

    Have had occasion to use Puget for a couple of custom builds over the years for video/animation work and CAD. Their focus on quite machines that are uber-reliable is the key, and puts them in a special niche' that is attractive to folks in large businesses who also need a custom rig. The two builds I got worked very well and lasted a long time, with the exception of the hard drives, which were subject to the same risk of failure as all mechanical drives.

    Net, I agree that, if you're going to go with Puget for the quality and quite, then definitely equip the Obsidian with a SSD boot and larger RAID for data (using RAID-specific drives), to which you can backup the main drive as well. This is also how I build 'em for home, works great!
  • 7Enigma - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    So basically I can build this same exact system for much less and have Puget to thank for the R&D that went into the component selection. :) sounds like a win.

    Seriously though, they need some form of custom design in order to justify the price hike. I don't think you can compare this build to a Dell or HP as some of those vital components are total junk, the Puget uses quality gear. But without making a real need from a custom angle (sound dampening, ducting, etc.) and the pathetic warranty I just couldn't recommend this system to someone.

    Thanks for the informative review.
  • yehuda - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    With reliability being the primary selling point I'm surprised they did not use a server board and ECC memory. Do they not mind the risk of using consumer RAM in a business critical machine? Or maybe there's no practical risk? I'm genuinely curious.
  • bobbozzo - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    I don't know about Sandy Bridge systems, but many 'enthusiast' systems I have built over the years will run with ECC memory.
  • yehuda - Tuesday, April 12, 2011 - link

    No, not since the 975X I'm afraid. None of the enthusiast or mainstream platforms that followed supported it, and I really don't know how we should approach the subject nowadays, because personally I've always worried that a system without ECC memory is inherently unstable.

    Seeing as this build lauds reliability so much and yet Puget found it appropriate to ship 8 gigs of non-ECC memory to a very demanding sector, I'll be happy if they could share their reasoning.
  • spikespiegal - Monday, April 18, 2011 - link

    So, Puget slaps together enthusiast parts and suddenly they are an HP / Dell contender? Yeah...OK. When you sell a million towers then you'll have some demographics to compare with a Dell precision.

    Failure rates of PCs are typically caused by component failure well outside the scope of what Puget claims they are testing; bad caps, faulty ICs, nominal voltage controllers, flaky HD controllers and motors, etc.

    I'm trying to find an ASUS or Antec brand component in our data center and can't.

    The low power consumption was due to the weak processor and lack of a dedicated video card. We have some dual core Thin Clients that use a fraction the power of the Puget and run on flash memory - no HD either. Would you like to benchmark those?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now