HP Mini 5103 LCD

The LCD is one of the toughest things to evaluate on this particular netbook. We know many people are looking for better than WSVGA (1024x600) resolution on netbooks, and here we have exactly that. You also get a multi-touch display as a potential bonus, but my experience with this particular display was less than ideal. Now we get to the actual numbers using hardware measurements, and the results don’t necessarily jive with my subjective impression. For one, the touch surface really adds an undesirable “sparkle” effect that the numbers just don’t reflect. Another point of contention is the colors; the 52.2% gamut actually puts it quite a bit higher than netbooks like the 5102, 1001P, etc. but it just doesn’t look that great. A lot of that probably goes back to the contrast ratio, however, where we measure less than 200:1 yet again, among the worst scores in our recent history—and joined by the HP Mini 311 and 5102.

Ultimately, this is just one particular LCD we’re evaluating, and it’s not even an option on the HP site anymore. The resolution is a nice change of pace, but everywhere else the LCD falls short. If you really like touchscreen interfaces, it might suit you well, and it might show up on the configurator again in the future. We just wish more laptop LCDs—yes, even LCDs on inexpensive netbooks—could look more like the ASUS 1001P or the MacBook Pro 13.

Laptop LCD Quality - Contrast

Laptop LCD Quality - White

Laptop LCD Quality - Black

Laptop LCD Quality - Color Accuracy

Laptop LCD Quality - Color Gamut

HP Mini 5103 Battery Life Conclusion: Dual-Core Atom Isn’t Enough
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • evident - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    Who in their right mind would buy a crippled laptop for $384. There are so many better choices of machines out there, such as the ULV C2D laptops
  • tehslax - Sunday, December 19, 2010 - link

    Its almost a scam.
    I have a asus dual core atom netbook(selling on ebay)
    The performance is only SLIGHTLY faster than single core atoms
    I wanted something portable but the loss in performance is completely frustrating
    Ended up buying a thinkpad x201, yes its more expensive but I got protability with power

    The netbook platform is a joke...
  • Shadowmaster625 - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    ...And the ship of sanity sails yet further away into the horizon. At what point does this absurdity become apparent to everyone? $1200? $2500? Hell HP should market a $10,000 crappy atom netbook just to see how many true suckers there are out there. I for one would like to know once and for all. Never mind that a K125 netbook costs $300 and can outdo this thing in every measurable category.

    So why dont we have more AMD design wins? I hope everyone understands why by now. It is because the guys who make the decisions on what chips to use.... well you know they all own 50 times as much Intel stock as they do AMD (if they own any AMD at all). That's because Intel is a DOW component. So if they have any money then chances are part of it is invested in Intel. So of course they're going to use Intel parts for the majority of designs, regardless of how craptastic they are. A $45 crystal HD decoder? Can I get a WTF? What kind of idiotic hare brained pipe dream hackjob solution is that? I bet broadcom execs bribed intel execs to make NM10 especially crappy just so Broadcom could sell a bunch of junk chips that dont even work right. Does an AMD chipset even cost that much?

    Who decided that it somehow makes sense to waste $45 on a crackheaded patchjob HD video solution when they could just use an AMD chipset, which is cheaper anyway, and then dump that $45 into a larger battery?
  • erwos - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    The pricing is absurd. The Asus 1210N and 1015PN come in way below that, even upgraded to match specs.

    Hell, my refurb Alienware M11x cost less.
  • lgpOnTheMove - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    HP has the 11.6" dm1z Nile netbook. It's without a doubt the best netbook as far as performance is concerned, and not much bigger or heavier than a 10" Mini 210.

    I'm actually surprised why HP hasn't made an enterprise 11.6" netbook. I would love to see the Nile platform inside a chassis like the 5103.
  • seanleeforever - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    okay. Jarred, do you really think this keyboard is "the best 10” keyboard I’ve ever used". I had a HP Mini 210, not 5103, but something that has the exact same keyboard. it is easily the WORST keyboard i have used (i give it to my cousin the second day because of it). and it has nothing to do with the keyboard built. it has to do with stupid keys themselves. and i simply cannot understand why this review doesn't even mention this gigantic flaw (unless they changed it in 5103, which i doubt)

    the smart HP engineers thought no one use F keys, as a result, the secondary function of "F" keys are swapped with the primary function. confusing? let me give you an example.

    say you want to close a program by ctrl + F4, perform a search by pressing F3, refresh website using F5, or go to address bar using F6, or full screen using F11. you cannot do it. you have to press fn + F keys to do. i mean, unless you are totally newb who doesn't use any shortcut keys, this laptop is simply unusable. to close an application i now have to press fn+ctrl+f4. some more complicated actions such as print word doc ("Ctrl + Shift + F12") now is unachievable thanks to this stupid keyboard.

    NOW. as i learned later on there is a way to solve it, and that is going to BIOS. but why doesn't HP make it default? and not every computer you use will give you the access to BIOS. and how many end user actually know this trick?
    all in all, giant flaw, i repeat. GIANT FLAW.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    I don't know about the 210, but I did try the Mini 311 and it's definitely not the same keyboard. Also, as you mention you can switch the functionality of the F keys in the BIOS, which is something I did almost immediately. Dell and a few others have tried the same thing for some reason... blame silly UI consultants. That said, the "best 10" keyboard" is still a far cry from a good 13.3" keyboard. :-)
  • Belard - Saturday, December 18, 2010 - link

    Its a reason I don't like Microsoft keyboards as the default settings for F-function are swapped for something else "Launch Word" "Launch Browser" etc. So after every time you boot up, you have to press the F-Lock key to turn on Normal F-Keys.

    I think the big-boys have done market research and found that most of todays users, especially younger generation, don't really make much use of F-Keys. Look at the ChromeOS netbooks for example... even doing away with the CAPS-Lock (which is understandable, if they simply make Holding the SHIFT key for a second turned it into a lock).
  • Jackattak - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    $688 for a netbook is obscene. I don't care what freakin' market you're in for a portable PC or what "selection of features" you're looking for. Anyone stupid enough to spend that kind of money on a freakin' netbook deserves to be a victim of a Justin Bieber concert teenage girl stampede.
  • Malih - Friday, December 17, 2010 - link

    I think that price is only when you have opted for multi touch screen, and multi touch NOTEbook is priced higher than $688, cmiiw

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now