Baseband and Cellular

On the far left side of the Nexus S is another region with the indicative flex/tape appearance that belies an antenna. From experimentation, this region is for WiFi and Bluetooth. The active region for the cellular region is at the very bottom of the Nexus S, as it is with the overwhelming majority of other phones.

We ran our normal suite of attenuation tests on the Nexus S and compared to the rest. The Nexus One had a mini antennagate of its own back when it came out, no doubt Google and Samsung both wanted to avoid a similar situation with the Nexus S. The table says it all - attenuation from holding the device is in line with the 15 dBm or so we’re used to seeing. There aren’t any attenuation issues with the Nexus S.

Signal Attenuation Comparison in dB—Lower is Better
  Cupping Tightly Holding Naturally On an Open Palm
Nexus S 13.3 6.1 4.3
Samsung Fascinate 10.0 5.0 0.0
Droid 2 11.5 5.1 4.5
BlackBerry Torch 15.9 7.1 3.7
Dell Streak 14.0 8.7 4.0
Droid X 15.0 5.1 4.5
iPhone 4 24.6 19.8 9.2
iPhone 3GS 14.3 1.9 0.2
Nexus One 17.7 10.7 6.7

I did notice however that the Nexus S likes falling back to EDGE from UMTS and HSPA a whole lot. I’ve only had a limited time to play with T-Mobile’s 3G turned 4G network, so I’m not crying foul, but I did notice that voice calls often migrate over to EDGE if you’re in marginal (but not awful) UMTS coverage, and data does the same from time to time. During my battery life call tests, I had to re-initiate the call three times due to the Nexus S falling from UMTS (3G) voice to GSM and not wanting to pollute data. Signal in my office is admittedly on the lower end at -91 dBm, but still within an acceptable range. The phone will automatically hand back on to UMTS, then to HSPA after a while, but the fallback to EDGE seems much more aggressive than I’ve ever remembered any device being.

I’ve run over 100 speedtests in the short three or so days I’ve had the Nexus S in my HSPA+ enabled T-Mobile market. I saw maximum throughput of 5.1 megabits/s down, 0.64 megabits/s up and average speeds of 2.55 megabits/s down, 0.51 megabits/s up over that time using the Speedtest.net application to a sever in the same city.

The Nexus S is a tri-band HSPA device and quad-band GSM device as shown in the table above. Just like the launch-day Nexus One, the Nexus S won’t work on any 3G in the USA except T-Mobile. You’ll get EDGE if you stick an AT&T SIM inside.

Nexus S - Network Support
Tri-Band HSPA 900 / 1700 / 2100 MHz
Quad-Band GSM/EDGE 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz
HSDPA/HSUPA 7.2Mbps / 5.76Mbps

When the Nexus One came out - before I signed on with AnandTech in this capacity - I wrote that the problem with the Nexus One concept was that the hardware didn’t have a pentaband UMTS radio. The promise was completely carrier-agnostic phone shopping, yet the only choice you could get with 3G UMTS/HSPA support was T-Mobile. Of course, an AT&T version came later, but the problem remained - hardware wasn’t carrier agnostic, so how could the promise ever be a reality? I’m disappointed that the same thing applies to the Nexus S, although this time around there’s no guarantee we’ll get an AT&T version at all. There are obvious engineering challenges to building pentaband UMTS/HSPA hardware, but if Nokia can do it with the N8 and a select few other phones can pull it off, it can’t be that hard.

 

The other thing on everyone’s mind is how much HSPA+ 21.1 differs from HSDPA 7.2 or 14.4 in practice. Well, I’ve been sitting on a myTouch 4G for a while waiting for some T-Mobile service to test with, and in comes a Nexus S with a T-Mobile SIM card. Naturally, I carried the two with me and ran tests at almost the same places. The results are pretty interesting. On the myTouch 4G, I saw maximum throughput of 7.18 megabits/s down, and 0.66 megabits/s up, with an average of 2.75 megabits/s down, and 0.56 megabits/s up.

Speedtests - HSPA+ vs HSPA

The subtle difference in most cases actually makes sense. The difference between HSDPA 14.4 and HSPA+ 21.1 is just a change in modulation from 16-QAM to 64-QAM. The symbol rates for those two are the same, they just differ in the modulation scheme by a factor of 4 more decision points. Since 64-QAM requires better SNR over 16-QAM, we really only see that modulation scheme when we’re close to the tower. When that’s the case and SNR is really good, HSPA+ of the 21.1 sort does pay off, and you get impressive speeds such as that 7.18 megabit/s speedtest. However, when you’re even just half way out of the cell radius, SNR is most likely no longer good enough for 64-QAM to maintain an acceptable frame error rate, and you’ll fall back to 16-QAM just the same. In reality, HSPA+ only becomes super interesting when MIMO is added into the picture, and even moreso when dual-carrier links are added. MIMO lets us multiplex the signal spatially, and multi-carrier effectively aggregates carriers together for a faster link.

 

WiFi range on the Nexus S is what I’m used to seeing for smartphones. I make it to the same place right at the curb with the Nexus S as I do other devices. The Nexus S has 802.11 n/b/g support, and I saw it connect at 72 megabits/s on my 802.11n network. In testing, the Nexus S downloaded our local 100 MB PDF over at 15 megabits/s over WiFi.

WiFi Performance

Rounding out this section is a note that the Nexus S suffers from none of the GPS issues that plague the Galaxy S. I tested thoroughly - fixes are fast and accurate over GPS and work like they should using Google location services with WiFi trilateration.

Camera Analysis Speakerphone, Voice, Battery
Comments Locked

73 Comments

View All Comments

  • Manabu - Wednesday, December 15, 2010 - link

    For who write in japanese, the Simeji keyboard loads by default in a mode with arrows, buttons for cut & paste, etc.
  • evan919 - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    You guys write some of the best mobile reviews on the web.

    About the GPS performance. GPS w/ WiFi location works well on my Galaxy S Captivate. However, relying on standalone GPS is where the problems come. Is there a way you can just use standalone GPS on the Nexus S and report back on GPS performance using Google Navigation?
  • Brian Klug - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    Awesome to hear, glad you enjoy them!

    So I just turned WiFI-augmented location services off, reset the phone (powercycled), and then fired up GPS test in my office. It took under 10 seconds to get full 3D GPS fix and seems completely fine SNR-wise. Looks good to me.

    -Brian
  • HMTK - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    And how good does this thing sync with Exchange? I'm getting a new smartphone and if 2.3 is a lot better than 2.2, I'll wait.
  • blueF - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    Great review Brian. I always wait for the anandtech reviews before making a decision on buying a phone. Also I was wondering if the Nexus S has a gorilla glass screen. I have so far been unable to find any reliable info on that.
  • Brian Klug - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    So I've been trying to find out whether the Nexus S has gorilla glass myself, but haven't found anything definite. I'll update if I do find out, however ;)

    -Brian
  • tjcioffe - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    swype's keyboard has arrow keys. swipe from the swype symbol to the SYM key right next to it.
  • vshah - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    have you considered running battery life tests without task killers running? if android is constantly restarting processes only to have them killed by the task killer, it could be skewing results. if you ran the numbers without the task killer, i'd like to see those. is that standard practice for all android battery life tests?

    Thanks for the review...i'm still not sure whether or not I should upgrade from my N1
  • Brian Klug - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    So system panel doesn't constantly kill tasks like other task killers. I kill everything before I start the test, allow things to launch again, and then unplug them from the power and the test begins.

    We've been pretty consistent doing this for all of our Android battery life tests. ;)

    -Brian
  • vol7ron - Tuesday, December 14, 2010 - link

    That's good to know, I thought this was a new scanner feature of the phone. Thanks for clarifying.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now