ZFS - Building, Testing, and Benchmarking
by Matt Breitbach on October 5, 2010 4:33 PM EST- Posted in
- IT Computing
- Linux
- NAS
- Nexenta
- ZFS
Strictly from a price vs. performance standpoint, the OpenSolaris ZFS server is a huge success. The test of 4k random performance with 66% writes and 33% reads is one that really excites us. We have historically graphed a lot of performance data about our cloud environment using MRTG, and this test most accurately describes our real world access patterns in our web hosting environment. At a load of 33, OpenSolaris logged nearly triple the performance compared to the Promise M610i. If we can deploy the OpenSolaris box into production and actually see this level of performance, we will be thrilled.
We will obviously consider using Nexenta because Nexenta has the LED’s and notifications working. Nexenta did not deliver as much performance as OpenSolaris did. In the 4k random 66% write 33% read test, Nexenta Enterprise managed to deliver about 90% of the performance of unmodified OpenSolaris. In some 32k tests, Nexenta delivered even less performance. It is tough to justify the cost of the Nexenta Enterprise license when it performs slower than free OpenSolaris. If you need a support path, then Nexenta Enterprise may be worth it.
When we started this project, our goal was to build a ZFS based storage solution that could match the price of a Promise M610i
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
102 Comments
View All Comments
mbreitba - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
Thanks for the comment on the ZIL.As far as using the X25-E's as ZIL devices - when we built the box initially, the X25-E's were the best choice at the time. Future builds will probably include a capacitor-backed SSD.
James5mith - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
For what it's worth, we are currently using roughly 16 of the Supermicro 846-E1 chassis in our storage solutions.Drive numbering is from bottom to top, left to right. Don't know if this helps or not.
5 11 17 23
4 10 16 22
3 9 15 21
2 8 14 20
1 7 13 19
0 6 12 18
badhack - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
I would be curious to know how the performance compares to traditional fs caching on Linux w/ ext3 or ext4 with same amount of memory and a few SSD drives.Maveric007 - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
There are a few options within Linux that would be pretty interesting to see. FS caching and the different schedulers that are available within Linux. Also I would throw out ext3 and replace that with ext4 and xfs. Redhat is now supporting xfs and there are just tons of tunables for xfs compared to the other file systems.badnews - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
Thanks Matt, I've been following the build over at your blog and this is an excellent article to tie it all together. I hope you follow up with your "things we'd do differently" in future articles. I would also love to see some more benchmarking against more alternatives, e.g. Open-E, or even an off-the-shelf EqualLogic.Keep up the good work :)
Fallen Kell - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
Well, I know at least for Solaris 10.... I would suspect that OpenSolaris has it as well by now, since it has been out for at least 4 years that I know of...https://<host>:6789
mbreitba - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
You can install the ZFS Web GUI from the Solaris toolkit, but it isn't bundled into OpenSolaris. It is binary compatible, but it doesn't give any good options for iSCSI setup, as it only supported the old iSCSI target rather than the new COMSTAR target.sfc - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
How can you spend a page talking about how you aren't really worried about the future of Opensolaris, and then have half a paragraph mentioning "oh, btw, it's cancelled"? The project is clearly dead. They stopped releasing source almost a month ago. Oracle has made absolutely no guarantees about when or how source would be released in the future. For all we know, they could release only portions of Solaris Express, and do it months to years after the binaries drop.http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=...
I love ZFS/Opensolaris, I use it at home, but Opensolaris is dead.
Mattbreitbach - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
OpenSolaris is indeed dead as far as development goes, but it's still viable if you want to use the last build released which is what all of our performance figures are based on. I will be writing some companion articles to this one talking about not only the death of OpenSolaris, but it's alternative, OpenIndiana, and the Promise M610i used as a comparison in this article.andersenep - Tuesday, October 5, 2010 - link
The OpenSolaris project may be dead but ZFS and all the CDDL licensed code is still out there. Illumos, OpenIndiana and a few other distros are still out there and available. Oracle has stated they will continue to release source code after Solaris releases and will also provide binary preview releases in the form of Solaris Express. To say Solaris and ZFS are dead is pretty premature.Whatever happens, the existing code is out there. To call it dead is a bit premature. Sure the project that had the name 'OpenSolaris' has been canceled, but everything that made it up (minus a small few closed bits that have already been replaced) lives on.