Now this is more like it on the pricing front for a flagship motherboard, at $299 shipped the XPower looks a lot more attractive than the other three boards we’re testing today. SATA 6G and USB 3 are present, together with a plug-in soundcard that includes Creative X-Fi drivers as part of the package.

Let’s take a look at package contents:

1 x Driver/utility DVD

7 x SATA cables

1 x Two port eSATA bracket

1 x Two port USB bracket

1 x Molex to 2 x SATA power connector cable

2 x Molex to SATA power connector cable

3 x SLI bridges

1 x CrossFireX bridge

4 x V-Check cables

1 x QuantumWave audio card

1 x User guide

1 x Quick start visual guide

1 x I/O shield

1 x OC Dashboard (remote overclocking panel)

A fairly comprehensive package from MSI,  including needed brackets, a plug-in soundcard plus a nifty little remote overclocking device known as OC Dashboard. For a description of the soundcard and OC panel we re-direct you here as there are no changes to either device, either electrically or in terms of operation – both work well. A decent bundle of goodies from MSI, especially if you take a gander at what Gigabyte are providing with the UD9 at over double the price.

 

Software

The software saga is the same as what has gone before on MSI. The main tool being Control Center:

We’re not sure what version MSI are currently shipping with retail boards, whatever it is, we’d advise you to head over to the MSI download section and grab the latest version just to be sure. Early versions of the software work in most regards, but do have a tendency to misreport voltages on occasion. This has been fixed so you should be good to go on the latest release.

Control Center hasn’t really seen any improvements over the past six months; every iteration offers the same level of options. While the memory tweaking section is a nice touch, changing any parameters requires a reboot - we may as well change things from BIOS instead.  Third party tools like CPU Tweaker do a better job than Control Center in this regard so it’s probably wise for MSI to either follow suit or put resources behind other areas of operation.

Where Control Center falls behind other vendor tools is a lack of multiplier changing options, which can be a pain for users who benchmark Gulftown processors. Other than that, options to control fans, voltages, bus speeds are all present – although we find OC Dashboard more convenient to use.

 

Board Layout

When we first laid eyes on the XPower, we were certain MSI had included an NF200 chip due to the number of PCIe slots on offer.  However, that’s not the case, it’s straight X58 routing.  Here’s a table copied from MSI’s user manual:

 

Board dimensions are standard ATX (24.4cm X 30.5cm). The XPower can run up to four cards in 8x lane width mode like the ASUS R3E, while dual and triple card configurations are confined to 16x/8x or 16x/8x/8x allocation respectively.  There may be a very slight penalty as a result of this for outright benchmarking scores, nothing worth worrying about for everyday use, though.

Layout is reasonable barring placement of the SATA 6G ports which become obscure if running a long dual-slot GPU in PEG slot four.  On-board features include, an OC Genie switch (one-touch pre-set overclocking), and also touch sensitive power, reset and BCLK adjustment pads. Voltage measurement points are also available, and MSI supply four plug in cables that allow hands free voltage monitoring from a digital multi-meter. Based upon features alone, the XPower appears to offer more “value” than ASUS’s R3E, and certainly better value than the two NF200 based boards included in this article.

Like other vendors, MSI have redesigned the power delivery stage for CPU Vcore for their new board, upping current delivery capabilities to around 360 amps (without need for modification -so we’re told).  Everything else is standard fare for the Big bang series, DrMOS FETs used in key locations, and a slew of tantalum capacitors used for decoupling major rails.

 

BIOS & User Experience

Familiar start here; be sure to flash the XPower to the latest BIOS as soon as it lands if you want a stress free ride during operation. Early BIOS releases won’t resume from S3 much past stock, and memory sub-timings have a habit of either being misreported or unresponsive to changes.  The latest BIOS fixes S3 resume, which should work up to 210 BCLK provided the board is setup properly (stable).

In total, the MSI BIOS is probably the least refined out of today’s test samples. Basic functionality is in place, and adequate for stock use. Heavier overclocking requires a fair amount of patience and/or knowledge of memory sub-timings to get the best from this board. Actually, the subject of memory overclocking is a bit of a sore point for us with the XPower board in comparison to everything else we’ve tried our memory modules and processors in. Speeds up to DDR3-1900 are okay, anything higher than that starts to suffer problems no matter what we do. There is more data on this later in the article, so we’ll sum up here by saying that we don’t think the XPower is an ideal choice for high speed memory clocking. Not only that, but this becomes quite an hindrance in certain benchmarking scenarios, too.

The positive side to the BIOS is that you can key in voltage values directly and that there is a built in BIOS flashing utility unlike EVGA. Peripheral setup options are also available in abundance, and work fine. Where things start to go awry, on the functionality side is that the built-in flashing routine does not seem to work with certain thumb drives (our PNY 2GB stick is incompatible). The BIOS does recognize and read the drive, root and subfolders, but does not manage to find the BIOS file for flashing. Plug in a different USB stick and everything works fine. We have reported this back to MSI several times now and they have not managed to fix it. Out of interest, the PNY stick is what we use with every other board for BIOS flashing and we’ve never seen this problem before.

click to enlarge
 
click to enlarge

Automated memory timing adjustment of individual parameters has never been one of MSI’s strong points, and that trait is prevalent on the XPower, too. Once again, you can either leave things completely in the hands of AUTO, tackle half of the timings manually, or if you’re feeling really brave, take on the whole brigade yourself. For new users, it’s better to set the DRAM frequency multiplier ratio manually and leave the DRAM section of the BIOS on AUTO at first, reboot the board then select the manual option. Doing so will at least give you a set of loose base timings to work away from when manual adjustment mode is selected.

This pretty much sums up our experience with the XPower; MSI have put together a good package of peripherals for wow factor and are more than competitive on pricing  in present company, but the overall execution of BIOS lacks refinement, and we feel there may be some hardware issues that hinder overclocking based upon how our sample boards behave when pushed hard.

Gigabyte X58A-UD9 Testbed Setup & Power Consumption
POST A COMMENT

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • Etern205 - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    People who get this all they cared about is the amount of nonsense that's place on these board and the size of their e-penis without any thought as to whether spending this much will bring the same in return. Reply
  • SniperWulf - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    It's official, Gigabyte is officially off their rocker!

    Now I get that they don't expect to sell these to everyone, but still for what you get, it's totally not worth it. I bet this board still has crappy fan controls too...
    Reply
  • MGSsancho - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Could you tell up what ACPI version these mobos use? I was able to find out the Gigabyte X58A-UD9 uses ACPI 1.0b but c'mon people version 4 is out. I have gone to every common mobo website and there is no board that supports anything higher than 2. Supermicro does sell version 3.0 and 4.0 on their latest offerings. ACPI is important to those of use who run other Operating systems and want to be able to use all those fancy power saving features with out drivers.

    Having many PCIE lanes is awesome for those of us into making file servers. But I suppose I am just better off with a server mobo, ECC ram and its better features
    Reply
  • xetura - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    These I7 setups are great and all, but they're still way too expensive. My q6600@3.6ghz still does just fine. I can't justify spending $650 for a mobo, cpu and ram setup that doesn't perform that much better than my setup. Sure, if I had SLI or XFIRE it will be a big jump, but I don't have either. Reply
  • chedy5sche - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    this website is good, you can go and see it
    http://www.shoes4world.com/
    Reply
  • Finally - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    ...when was the last time, AT reviewed an AMD chipset board?
    4 (!) months ago. Just click on the big "motherboard" button above.
    Check out the ratio Intel:AMD...

    Funnily enough the last AMD board had its price right in the title: $140!

    ...seriously, guys. If you have to admit to yourselves, that you are running out of Intel board to review, MAYBE test something I'm actually interested in.
    Reply
  • tercathian - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    Yeah, 19 of 20 reviews on Intel, some as multiple boards (just on the first/latest directory page). 1 AMD board review????
    Balance, AT, Balance!
    What are the good, the bad, the great, and the ugly of AMD boards out there currently?
    Reply
  • ggathagan - Sunday, July 18, 2010 - link

    So...
    What was your translation of the first paragraph of the article?

    You know, where Raja stated:
    "Thus far, we’ve spent most of 2010 focusing on mainstream segments for our motherboards reviews, there’s more of that to come over the next few months starting off with a long overdue focus on AMD"
    Reply
  • MaxMax - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    WTF !!

    $700 for a motherboard ?!

    What so special about it even $200 - $250 motherboards bypass it !!

    It is not even fit in my Coolermaster HAF 932 case !!

    They got mad !!
    Reply
  • MacGyverSG1 - Monday, July 19, 2010 - link

    I have read a few reviews and I think the memory problem might only affect the early production boards. I noticed in your pictures, and you stated, that the SATA 6GB/s ports are facing up. Other reviews have pictures that show the SATA 6GB/s ports at a 90 degree angle like the rest. I also was able to see that that board was v1.1. Maybe you have a v1.0 board that had problems that were fixed with v1.1? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now