Now this is more like it on the pricing front for a flagship motherboard, at $299 shipped the XPower looks a lot more attractive than the other three boards we’re testing today. SATA 6G and USB 3 are present, together with a plug-in soundcard that includes Creative X-Fi drivers as part of the package.

Let’s take a look at package contents:

1 x Driver/utility DVD

7 x SATA cables

1 x Two port eSATA bracket

1 x Two port USB bracket

1 x Molex to 2 x SATA power connector cable

2 x Molex to SATA power connector cable

3 x SLI bridges

1 x CrossFireX bridge

4 x V-Check cables

1 x QuantumWave audio card

1 x User guide

1 x Quick start visual guide

1 x I/O shield

1 x OC Dashboard (remote overclocking panel)

A fairly comprehensive package from MSI,  including needed brackets, a plug-in soundcard plus a nifty little remote overclocking device known as OC Dashboard. For a description of the soundcard and OC panel we re-direct you here as there are no changes to either device, either electrically or in terms of operation – both work well. A decent bundle of goodies from MSI, especially if you take a gander at what Gigabyte are providing with the UD9 at over double the price.

 

Software

The software saga is the same as what has gone before on MSI. The main tool being Control Center:

We’re not sure what version MSI are currently shipping with retail boards, whatever it is, we’d advise you to head over to the MSI download section and grab the latest version just to be sure. Early versions of the software work in most regards, but do have a tendency to misreport voltages on occasion. This has been fixed so you should be good to go on the latest release.

Control Center hasn’t really seen any improvements over the past six months; every iteration offers the same level of options. While the memory tweaking section is a nice touch, changing any parameters requires a reboot - we may as well change things from BIOS instead.  Third party tools like CPU Tweaker do a better job than Control Center in this regard so it’s probably wise for MSI to either follow suit or put resources behind other areas of operation.

Where Control Center falls behind other vendor tools is a lack of multiplier changing options, which can be a pain for users who benchmark Gulftown processors. Other than that, options to control fans, voltages, bus speeds are all present – although we find OC Dashboard more convenient to use.

 

Board Layout

When we first laid eyes on the XPower, we were certain MSI had included an NF200 chip due to the number of PCIe slots on offer.  However, that’s not the case, it’s straight X58 routing.  Here’s a table copied from MSI’s user manual:

 

Board dimensions are standard ATX (24.4cm X 30.5cm). The XPower can run up to four cards in 8x lane width mode like the ASUS R3E, while dual and triple card configurations are confined to 16x/8x or 16x/8x/8x allocation respectively.  There may be a very slight penalty as a result of this for outright benchmarking scores, nothing worth worrying about for everyday use, though.

Layout is reasonable barring placement of the SATA 6G ports which become obscure if running a long dual-slot GPU in PEG slot four.  On-board features include, an OC Genie switch (one-touch pre-set overclocking), and also touch sensitive power, reset and BCLK adjustment pads. Voltage measurement points are also available, and MSI supply four plug in cables that allow hands free voltage monitoring from a digital multi-meter. Based upon features alone, the XPower appears to offer more “value” than ASUS’s R3E, and certainly better value than the two NF200 based boards included in this article.

Like other vendors, MSI have redesigned the power delivery stage for CPU Vcore for their new board, upping current delivery capabilities to around 360 amps (without need for modification -so we’re told).  Everything else is standard fare for the Big bang series, DrMOS FETs used in key locations, and a slew of tantalum capacitors used for decoupling major rails.

 

BIOS & User Experience

Familiar start here; be sure to flash the XPower to the latest BIOS as soon as it lands if you want a stress free ride during operation. Early BIOS releases won’t resume from S3 much past stock, and memory sub-timings have a habit of either being misreported or unresponsive to changes.  The latest BIOS fixes S3 resume, which should work up to 210 BCLK provided the board is setup properly (stable).

In total, the MSI BIOS is probably the least refined out of today’s test samples. Basic functionality is in place, and adequate for stock use. Heavier overclocking requires a fair amount of patience and/or knowledge of memory sub-timings to get the best from this board. Actually, the subject of memory overclocking is a bit of a sore point for us with the XPower board in comparison to everything else we’ve tried our memory modules and processors in. Speeds up to DDR3-1900 are okay, anything higher than that starts to suffer problems no matter what we do. There is more data on this later in the article, so we’ll sum up here by saying that we don’t think the XPower is an ideal choice for high speed memory clocking. Not only that, but this becomes quite an hindrance in certain benchmarking scenarios, too.

The positive side to the BIOS is that you can key in voltage values directly and that there is a built in BIOS flashing utility unlike EVGA. Peripheral setup options are also available in abundance, and work fine. Where things start to go awry, on the functionality side is that the built-in flashing routine does not seem to work with certain thumb drives (our PNY 2GB stick is incompatible). The BIOS does recognize and read the drive, root and subfolders, but does not manage to find the BIOS file for flashing. Plug in a different USB stick and everything works fine. We have reported this back to MSI several times now and they have not managed to fix it. Out of interest, the PNY stick is what we use with every other board for BIOS flashing and we’ve never seen this problem before.

click to enlarge
 
click to enlarge

Automated memory timing adjustment of individual parameters has never been one of MSI’s strong points, and that trait is prevalent on the XPower, too. Once again, you can either leave things completely in the hands of AUTO, tackle half of the timings manually, or if you’re feeling really brave, take on the whole brigade yourself. For new users, it’s better to set the DRAM frequency multiplier ratio manually and leave the DRAM section of the BIOS on AUTO at first, reboot the board then select the manual option. Doing so will at least give you a set of loose base timings to work away from when manual adjustment mode is selected.

This pretty much sums up our experience with the XPower; MSI have put together a good package of peripherals for wow factor and are more than competitive on pricing  in present company, but the overall execution of BIOS lacks refinement, and we feel there may be some hardware issues that hinder overclocking based upon how our sample boards behave when pushed hard.

Gigabyte X58A-UD9 Testbed Setup & Power Consumption
POST A COMMENT

53 Comments

View All Comments

  • Etern205 - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Anyone notice the dual 8-pin on the Asus? Reply
  • EVM - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    You guys make me laugh when you rip the makers of these boards! Reply
  • mobutu - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    You have to be really crazy to spend $700 on a motherboard, video card or cpu.
    Or, for that matter, on any single pc component.
    Reply
  • Acanthus - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    This just in, 2 year old chipset performs identically to launch, give or take 1%.

    Intel needs to stop revoking the licenses of their competitors.

    But then they couldn't have the best quarter ever during the worst economy in 70 years.
    Reply
  • jonup - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Actually economy is doing just fine. If it wasn't for cheating sovereign government in Europe and the resulting debt crisis we would have been doing even better. Reply
  • kallogan - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    I don't see the point really. They're just for geeky fanboys or benchmarks junky. Getting cheap computer parts and push them to their limits is a lot more fun ;-). Buying a celeron dual core E3200 and make it score more than a E8600, that is fun.

    It's like these memory kits :
    Corsair Dominator GT 8-8-8-24 2200MHz 4GB kit
    G.Skill Perfect Storm 8-8-8-24 2200MHz 4GB kit
    .....
    Dominator, perfect storm, extreme my a.... Everybody knows high-end memory kits are marketing jokes and brings absolutely nothing but 0,1 %.
    Reply
  • Voldenuit - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Honestly, I think reviewing these things is a waste of time.

    I'd rather see reviews of real products that real enthusiasts would buy. Don't they have sites dedicated to LN2/cascade cooling overclocking and hardware?

    I'd never spend more than $200 on a motherboard, and something closer to $120 would be more like it. I'd also rather find out how the options in that price space would suit my needs rather than read about expensive, impractical halo products on a platform that is going to be obsoleted in a few months by Sandy Bridge anyway.
    Reply
  • jonup - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    Man, this is like porn. It's what can't don't want to have, but like watching it anyways. Reply
  • Voldenuit - Saturday, July 17, 2010 - link

    Nah, reading a $700 Thermaltake Level 10 case review is geekpr0n. A $700 motherboard based on a 2-year old chipset with no real performance or innovation gains is more like goatse. :p Reply
  • shin0bi272 - Friday, July 16, 2010 - link

    If they dont really do anything new/better performance wise (save for sata6g, and usb3) and intel is changing sockets with the sandy bridge later this year then what's the point of reviewing these now? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now