User Interface: The Next Generation

For years we've wondered how desktop applications would get the multitouch treatment. While the iPad isn't a desktop computer, it does show us how multitouch will scale up to larger, deeper applications. And it can work very well.

Surprising is the fact that some of the biggest innovation in the UI department doesn't come from Apple, but from 3rd party developers instead. Will Smith (no, not the Will Smith, but still a cool dude) tweeted that the Epicurious app shows the potential of the platform. Now everyone has been talking about what does and doesn't show the potential of the platform, but Will wasn't wrong.

This app is a chef's aid, a recipe app. You can pick from different categories of food, browse lists of recipes by user ratings (updated over the internet) and it'll even put together a grocery list for you based on the recipes you've selected. The UI looks nothing like any smartphone, notebook or desktop application.

In fact, it doesn't even look like any Apple application either. It's perfectly unique and is tailor made to its job. It's an extension of Steve Jobs' take on the iPhone keyboard. For years smartphones had physical keyboards that were present in the same configuration regardless of what app you were running. The iPhone helped change that. For decades applications have all conformed to their underlying OS and its UI constraints. The iPad is Apple signaling the end of the cookie cutter, conformist UI.

Five years ago you might buy/laugh at a gadget that just does the function of the Epicurious app. Today you can run it along with thousands of others on the iPad. It's like the transition from fixed function silicon to general purpose processors. The iPad is the general purpose gadget.

ABC's player app is the same way. It looks nothing like the Epicurious app, or anything else on the iPad. You almost forget that you're using the iPad when you're using an app like this, your focus is entirely on the content.


That's just the first thing that came up, I don't actually watch it, I swear

This sort of innovation is unfortunately too few and far between on the iPad today. I don't doubt that it will come, but it's just not here yet in quantity. Most developers just got access to the iPad on This is why everyone keeps talking about the promise of the platform. Unfortunately spending (at least) $499 on the promise of more excellence to come is something only a habitual early adopter can afford to do. In many ways this echoes the original iPhone's launch. I feel like the iPhone made a stronger case for itself on day one, and viable iPhone competitors were years out rather than 0 - 12 months out in the case of the iPad.

Mail, Calendar & Contacts Apps The App Store, The Robbing Continues
Comments Locked

108 Comments

View All Comments

  • zodiacfml - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Another quality review, useful as trying the device myself.

    I'm not buying Apple products but you touched on features that it should have.
    One is the ability to stand on its own to function as a picture frame, movie screen, and reader while someone is eating or something else.
    Support for mouse device and keyboard when it can already stand on its own.
    Support for uploading media such as video and photos from either flash cards or directly from cameras. it is such a good device to use with cameras.

    one more thing, they could get the intel atom cpu once it gets to a smaller process to improve size and energy efficiency.
  • Spivonious - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Anand, I love your writing and have read the site since the GeoCities days, but please learn the difference between "lay" and "lie".
  • crimson117 - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    My biggest pet peeve with the iPhone UI is the lack of an indicator for when an app is visible but busy processing something and not currently accessible.

    The default Notepad app on the iPhone 3G is a great example - as soon as you tap the icon, the yellow Notepad interface pops right up. However, it actually takes several seconds to finish loading until you can tap to edit a note or tap the (+) sign to start a new note. There's no indicator at all of when the loading is complete - you have to keep tapping periodically until it finally works.

    The same is true for resizing a web page using multitouch - there's no indicator that your input has been received but it's going to take a few moments to make it happen.

    In Windows 7 when an app is "thinking" and thus you can't interact with it, your mouse pointer becomes a a little circle (aka an hourglass). If an app is ever extremely busy thinking, the app may even gray out to indicate that even Windows can't get it to respond at that time.

    The iPhone's lack of this feature just smells of Apple trying to make the device appear on the surface to be more responsive than it really is. Perhaps you'll question whether you tapped correctly, and won't realize that the device is just slower than you expect it to be.
  • archcommus - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    This article, like your others, despite being 22 (!) pages long, is a quick, refreshing read. It feels more like you're talking about your experiences and less like you're writing an article as a journalist (which can make some other long reviews a little boring). Also seemed pretty unbiased and highlighted the good and bad. Another solid article, thanks.
  • Mumrik - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Hehe, this isn't a big deal - it's just amusing:

    "Although there's no mute button, holding the volume down rocker for 2 seconds mutes the device instantly."

    Nope. Sounds to me like it takes about two seconds to mute the device :)
  • AstroGuardian - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Good one. My thought exactly...
  • leospagnol - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    I'm planning to buy one of them when I travel to US next month. THe Eee 1001P is $ 280.00, and the iPad $499.00 at least. I usually read more than I write during classes and I have wifi available during class. I'll probably buy the Eee, but wich do you think suits this task best?
  • Mumrik - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    Imagine the iPad lying flat on your desk and then imagine the position you would have to sit in all lecture long if you wanted to be able to write.

    Then imagine how much of the time you'd have to look down at what you were writing because you didn't have the physical response of a keyboard to make touch typing easy.

    Now imagine not being able to multitask.

    It would not be a difficult choice for me - Anand said it himself - the iPad is generally not a laptop substitute.
  • videogames101 - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    I love the M3, great episode there.

    Good to know I can watch it on the iPad, lol.
  • AstroGuardian - Thursday, April 8, 2010 - link

    As far as i remember, this was not mentioned in the review (the overheating problem):
    http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=18075

    Personally i don't think it's worth commenting. It's not just the iPad but all other electronic devices will overheat when put out on the sun. And i wouldn't call it overheating but more like misuse.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now