Our title comes from an email I received today. It is a very good question and one that certainly deserves an answer. Well, let's start off with Anand and Derek attending GDC 2009 this week so they are consumed with meetings and even more meetings. Hopefully we will hear from them shortly, if not, we will send a process server out to find them.

Jarred is busy working on a slew of notebook articles and will have a review up on an interesting unit from Dell in the very near future. I have motherboards and memory kits stacked in such a way that it has created an elaborate maze between test rooms. In fact, without a GPS device for navigation, I sometimes feel like an axe-wielding Jack Torrance wandering the hallways. The majority of these products are still running a variety of tests, some for the fourth or fifth time to be honest, which might explain why I have an axe and ulcer.

Besides a rouge power supply that took delight in slowly damaging some of the latest and greatest products on the test bench before it went up in a blaze of glory, we have had an interesting time with our AMD AM3 motherboards. We tested several BIOS releases, provided our input, and then tested what came back to us. This should have been a quick process based on our agreements with the suppliers and fairly mature chipsets.   As it turns out, the performance differences between BIOS releases have been all over the map. It has been a case of plug one leak and then find two more a day later instead of just fixing a particular set of problems. Although the boards have been extremely solid at stock settings, when pushed they have exhibited more personalities than Sybil.

This is not to slight the products or scare monger away potential customers. We absolutely love the latest AM3 products from MSI, Gigabyte, and ASRock along with their updated AM2+ lineups. Testing started a few weeks ago with our motherboards from ASUS for a series of articles ranging from CrossFireX performance with the ultra hot and chic Phenom II X3 720BE, a DDR2 versus DDR3 memory performance comparison, enhancing platform performance via increases in Northbridge speed, and of course the actual motherboard reviews.

The good news is that the latest beta BIOS' have solved the vast majority of problems, it just took sometime to get to this point. The one interesting aspect is that all of the motherboards at one time or another suffered from similar problems. This usually does not occur and it lead to some interesting discoveries and then solutions on behalf of the BIOS teams. At one point I joked with a particular supplier if all of the BIOS engineers from the various motherboard companies met at the same Internet Cafe in Taipei during evening hours to discuss ways to ensure my total hair loss by May.

It was just strange as each 790FX AM3 board eventually suffered the same problem. Everything from the boards hard locking if HT reference clocks were set over 214 with CrossFireX active to various problems clocking Northbridge speeds up and poor memory performance just to name a few. To everyone's credit, the problems have been identified and are being solved or have been solved. We are at the point now where the last few remaining problems will mainly affect those who utilize Dry Ice or LN2 for overclocking, otherwise, the boards are in or will be in excellent shape within a week as updated BIOS' are released. We will discuss this further in an upcoming article, but a major factor for some of the quirky behavior between BIOS releases had to do with updated AGESA code from AMD during and after the AM3 launch.

All that said, we are at the point now where our results at least make sense and are repeatable. Later today we will publish the 720BE CrossFire article and in a couple of days we will have the DDR2/DDR3 comparison on the AMD platform. In April we will start rolling out the motherboard reviews for the 790FX/790GX AM3 boards along with a really good AM2+ 780G product update from ASRock that impressed us and should be in stock shortly.

In the meantime, we are expecting our first retail Core i7 D0 stepping processors in a few days and will provide an immediate update on a product that has been generating a lot of forum buzz the past few weeks. Speaking of the i7, we will discuss the ASRock X58 motherboard shortly as it is running four GTX-295 cards without a problem and our long term stability tests indicate this is a very solid product from a newcomer in this market. Also on the calendar in April is our second X58 motherboard roundup with a focus on the motherboards priced under $250. Raja will provide results for the more extreme crowd with the latest enthusiast boards from EVGA, Foxconn, and ASUS.

We have a mini-ITX roundup that is almost finished with chipsets from both Intel and AMD plus a few other surprises later on for the HTPC and SFF audience. Right now we have to say the smaller and more nimble companies like Zotac and J&W have really impressed us with their latest products.

With our AM3 memory performance problems behind us, we can finish up testing several DDR3 kits for a large roundup early next month. In fact, our entire focus on the article changed midway through testing as the latest DDR3-1333 kits are providing the best balance of price and performance at this time.

Last but not least, we are knee deep in testing our first workstation products from Supermicro and will have products from HP and others in the future. We really appreciate all of the comments and suggestions from our last blog about the subject matter. Since that time we have hooked up with several suppliers for both hardware and software that is workstation centric. I will go into this in more detail shortly, but we have a variety of ATI FirePro video cards from AMD (before anyone brings it up, we asked NVIDIA to also participate with their latest Quadro series and our requests were declined), Corsair provided an excellent 24GB DDR3 kit, RAID controllers from HighPoint and Areca, enterprise drives from Western Digital, Seagate, and Fujitsu along with software from Autodesk to MainConcept to SolidWorks just to name a few items.

It is going to be a very busy April for us and I only touched on about half of what is going on at this point. I just know it is an exciting time on this end and hopefully our extended coverage in several areas will be exciting for you also. If not, be sure to let us know. In the meantime, I have an article to finish editing and an axe to sharpen for someone if another BIOS shows up today.

Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • RadnorHarkonnen - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    I really envy ya.Would love to be there.

    Thats it. Now back to my lancia I got a dashboard to mount. And a 309 GTI to tune.

    It is a cheaper hobbie. AAhh...anyway. Have fun!
  • kilkennycat - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    There was a simple and very useful (imho) survey recently conducted by Anandtech as to how much one might pay for the next graphics update "How much do Cost and Value Matter" (February 28,2009 - now in the Blogs section). 10,000 total votes - the mean was around $200, which obviously does not cover any decent SLI or Crossfire variants. In fact, the sum total of those responding to the survey in the price areas of decent 2-card SLI Crossfire or dual-GPU is a sum-total of 4% of the survey. As for those in the price-range of tri-card or quad graphics, they account for less than 1% of the review-respondents. I was rather hoping that there would be some more immediate follow-up statement from Anandtech about the pattern and scope of reviews going forward based on the results of this simple survey... but nothing so far. It does seem to me that this type of cost-survey should be repeated for system-builds. I suspect that you will see a similar pattern appear, with the interest in Core i7 builds being in the <10% category, when the total core-system-costs $$(MB+CPU+MEMORY+PS+CASE) are factored into the equation as was done with the "GPU-price" in the above graphics-update survey.

    So, while it is very nice to drool over all these reviews of high-end systems, they are apparently not much practical help to the majority of your readers when attempting to choose their next system-build components - especially in these recessionary times.

    Have you established exactly how well Core-i7 components systems are selling to the general public? Yes, there are lots of Core-i7 components out there, but they were in the design-pipe before the world economies fell off a cliff. It is rather noticeable that Intel has radically delayed the introduction of sundry Core i7 successors and that their quarterly revenues have similarly fallen off the edge of a cliff.

    For just one example of an apparent disconnect while falling over yourselves with high-end system-build reviews, you have neglected to complete the long-promised review (for the past ~ 4 months) of HTPC-type builds based on the various available nV MPC7A/9300/9400-IGP motherboards - maybe including in-depth performance comparisons with the AMD/ATI and Intel offerings in the same HTPC segment.
  • Minion4Hire - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    Bitter much? I think these higher end component reviews are useful for many people, in various ways. If you can't afford higher end components, it's easier to find where you can compromise and still manage the best performance possible if you can relate that to the highest end offerings available. Besides, if you're on a limited budget then you have to be willing to make some compromises, and it really comes down to how much performance you can afford. The new Core i7 stepping isn't going to affect the price or performance of $150 processors, and we already know that the Phenom II X3 720 is a better value than an E7500 Wolfdale if you can utilize that third core. What else do you expect them to cover?

    As for that survey, I voted for the $200 price bracket (I believe, it WAS a month ago) but I took that to mean the price PER GPU. I just ordered a 2GB 4850 X2 as Anandtech's multi-gpu comparisons helped prove to me that it was one of the better value single cards available for higher settings and higher resolutions. Maybe it isn't the most cost effective as far as $/FPS goes but it does offer better framerates at a reasonable price, and with my more budget-oriented motherboard selection, standard Crossfire/SLI setups are not available to me.

    At the end of the day you can continue to bitch about how the majority of readers aren't being considered, but computer hardware review has always been about drooling over the latest and greatest, biggest and baddest. I don't intend to buy a Core i7 rig until 8-core 32nm parts have been well tested and more mainstream chipsets are available, but I still want to know about the i7's progress.
  • chucky2 - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    Any word on when we'll start seeing pre-reviews Gary?
  • 7Enigma - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    You guys really deserve a gold star for the amazing amount of "help" (read proper beta-testing) of the mobo's. I think I can speak for all of us readers and say thank you. But please, as much and as nice as the current bios' might be, you need to seriously keep harping on the fact that they were originally in an unfinished state. And to the few that release before all bugs are fixed, smash them to the wall....maybe with an axe?

    :)
  • poohbear - Friday, March 27, 2009 - link

    I really enjoy reading your reviews, but sometimes in an article u state you're gonna follow-up on something and yet we never hear of such a follow up? I'm STILL waiting for that corsair HX 520wt review that u guys mentioned u'll be reviewing in a number of different psu reviews, but not its been released for 2+ years so it seems pointless to follow up on it.
  • gss4w - Thursday, March 26, 2009 - link

    I think AnandTech has really good in depth reviews, but I have noticed a number of times when you say your are working on something, and then it just disappears. Overall, I like the site though, so I'm not suggesting that anything be changed. As for the Ubuntu article, the software is free so if anyone is really interested they can try it themselves pretty easily.
  • OlivierZ - Thursday, March 26, 2009 - link

    The last review of high end X58 board promised an in-depth Bios tuning guide for X58 boards.
    Has Anandtech lab ditched this project ?
  • foci - Thursday, March 26, 2009 - link

    I would like to know this as well. I have been patiently waiting for the OC guide as promised in previous X58 board reviews.
  • strikeback03 - Thursday, March 26, 2009 - link

    I've started on my carputer system by buying a pre-molded screen and older system from another guy, now it's time to start on what will be in my system. Will this include all the way down to the Atom 330 level, or only more capable boards/processors?

    Looking forward to it!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now