Conclusion

Overall, the DH57JG is a balanced performer in almost every department (apart from slow USB throughput) and like most Intel desktop boards it’s geared for conservative use. In this instance we think that Intel made the right choice, because we haven’t seen anyone execute mini-ITX well enough for heavy overclocking. On the face of it, all three mini-ITX boards we’ve looked at over the past few months have similar limitations in power delivery. Out of the three vendors though, it seems Intel have put more work into planning what can and cannot work well over the long-term and have trimmed the DH57JG BIOS accordingly without the need for a bout of public beta testing first.

Most of the BIOS menus are well laid out and uncomplicated, which makes things less daunting for users who lack experience. It's also pleasing to know that we did not encounter a single instance where the board refused to work with any of our test peripherals. The only bone we have to pick with current BIOS functionality is with regards to CPU multiplier ratio control for Clarkdale processors – we can only use the stock CPU multiplier ratio, and we can’t understand why that’s the case when you can adjust multipliers on Lynnfield processors.

There’s also the looming issue of price, $125 for mini-ITX seems a tad expensive when you glance over the feature sets of similarly priced (or cheaper) m-ATX boards. Of course, we need to factor the questions of product reliability, long-term support, validation processes for updates and ease of use, areas where third party vendors seem to come up short in some instances. Perhaps that’s the positive element of investing in the purchase of an Intel motherboard - you're guaranteed long term support.


To sweeten the deal further, we’d like to have seen USB 3 or some kind of wireless capabilities at the $125 mark, and it would be nice if we don’t see retailers charging early adopter premiums on that figure because you’ll be paying more than the board is fundamentally worth.

The alternative to the DH57JG is Zotac’s H55-ITX, which is more 'enthusiast' oriented (you get 10 USB ports on the rear I/O and WiFi capabilities), although you have to pay $145 for the whole experience. We’re hopeful that other manufacturers will jump onto the mini-ITX bandwagon and help drive these prices down.

In fact, if all vendors adopt Intel's no-fluff desktop board approach and focus R&D/support departments on the basics, we're sure they'd be able to deliver products that are just as if not more functional than what Intel are offering at $125. As such, it's probably wise to wait a couple of months and see how things pan out. If waiting is not an option though, and all you need is a plug and play stock-runner, rest assured that the DH57JG will certainly deliver over the long haul. 

System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • BansheeX - Monday, March 1, 2010 - link

    This board is pretty much the successor to the DG45FC, so it would have been better to run performance and power consumption comparisons with that.

    It would also be worthwhile to explain the market for these boards and what they're capable of. These boards are for people who want silence and a small form factor, but don't want to sacrifice performance. True, an Atom box costs less and consumes significantly less power, but you might be surprised to know that an E8400 on a DG45FC with a few drives can still run on 80W DC adapter + 120W picoPSU. I'm doing this myself and have never had a hiccup. I'd imagine that 80W would not be enough if you added a video card, but I don't do that.
  • SKE4826 - Tuesday, November 22, 2011 - link

    This board is nice overall. I have two of them with SSD's for HTPC and BRPC. Both overclock overclock my i5's nicely. 3.2Ghz 650 pushed to 3.6Ghz and 3.33Ghz 661 pushed to 4.Ghz.

    The BIOS update on these board is a nightmare - I cannopt stress this enough - I may never buy an Intel MB again. Not once has it worked right, via either of the mothods. It doesn't get much worse than this for a BIOS update. I have built several hundred systems over the past 25 years and never have I seen a BIOS update process worse than this. I would love to watch anyone try and say otherwise.

    Other than that, I love this ITX setup with my tiny Antec 150 cases.
  • Teknoman117 - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    I realize this is a necropost 6 years after the fact, but I've got an i7-870 on hand that i was trying to put in a mini-itx system. Does this board in fact lock out the i7? You guys said that an 860 was working but comments below report no-post with an 860? I forgot intel used to do these stupid locking things in 2010 and ended up buying one of these off ebay. Does it work or am i screwed?
  • eagle63 - Monday, February 29, 2016 - link

    Talk about timing - I just stumbled across this review today (feb 29 1016) because I have this motherboard and was hoping to be able to drop an i7-870 in it. But like you, the comments have me concerned that it won't work. I've been doing some googling but can't find any confirmation on whether or not that CPU will work with this board.

    Maybe this is a crazy idea, but you could mail me your CPU and I could drop it in my board and try it out? (then return it obviously) :) Only half kidding here..

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now