BIOSTAR TH55XE

BIOSTAR TH55XE is currently priced at $115 on Newegg and other online retailers. A $115 MSRP puts the TH55XE smack in the middle of the H55 playing field where competition is fierce from the likes of Gigabyte and ASUS. In fact, BIOSTAR are on the ropes because ASUS and Gigabyte are offering USB3 on their boards around this price point.

BIOSTAR TH55XE
Market Segment H55 General Use/HTPC
CPU Interface LGA-1156
CPU Support LGA-1156 i3/i5/i7 Series of Processors
Chipset Intel H55 Express Chipset
BCLK Speeds 100-800MHz in 1MHz increments
DDR3 Memory Speed 800, 1067, 1333 Frequency Ratios
QPI Frequency All supported mutlpier ratios available
Core Voltage Stock VID ~ +1.26V in 0.02V increments
CPU undervoltage offered Stock VID -0.02V ~ -0.08V in 0.02V increments
CPU Vdroop Compensation Enabled/Disabled
CPU Clock Multiplier Dependant on Processor, all available multipliers supported
DRAM Voltage DDR3 Auto, 1.30V ~ 1.55VV in 0.05V ~ 0.1V increments, then 1.50V ~ 2.545V in 0.015V increments (1.50V base)
DRAM Timing Control tCL, tRCD, tRP, tRAS, + 8 Additional Timings
DRAM Command Rate Auto, 1N and 2N
PCH Voltage Auto, 1.10V ~ 1.25V in .05V increments, 1.05V Base
CPU VTT (Uncore) Voltage 1.15V ~ 2.08V in 0.015V increments
CPU PLL Voltage 1.1V ~ 2.03V in 0.15V increments, 1.81V Base
IGD VID Stock VID ~ +0.6V in 0.02V increments
Memory Slots Four 240-pin DDR3 DIMM Slots
Dual-Channel Configuration
Regular Unbuffered DDR3 Memory to 16GB Total
Expansion Slots 1 x PCI-E 2.0 x16 Slot
1 x PCI-E 2.0 x4 Slot (running at x4, 2.5GT/s)
2 x PCI slot
Onboard SATA/RAID 5 x SATA 3.0GB/s (Support NCQ, AHCI and Hot Plug)
1 x eSATA on Rear I/O
Onboard USB 2.0 10 USB 2.0 ports (6) I/O Panel, 6 via brackets
Onboard LAN 1 x Realtek 8111DL Gigabit LAN (PCI-E x1)
Onboard Audio Realtek ALC888 - 7.1 Channel HD Audio
Other Onboard Connectors 1 x Print Port, 1 x Serial Port, 1 x FP Audio, 1 x Front Panel, 1 x 1394, 1 x IDE (JMB368), 1 x Power Switch, 1 x Reset Button
Power Connectors ATX 24-pin, 8-pin EPS 12V
I/O Panel 1 x PS/2 Keyboard
1 x PS/2 Mouse
1 x RJ45
4 x USB 2.0/1.1
1 x eSATA
1 x 1394 (LSI FW 322)
1 x Optical Toslink
1 x DVI-D
1 x HDMI
1 x VGA/D-sub
6 Audio I/O jacks
Fan Headers 1 CPU + 2 Additional Headers
Fan Control Full temp/speed fan control for CPU header via BIOS or OS software
No speed control for SYS Fans
Package Contents 3 x SATA Cables, 1 x SATA Power Cable, 1 x User Guide, 1 x Driver/software DVD, 1 x I/O Shield
Board/BIOS Revisions Used Board Rev: Ver 5.0
BIOS Files Used: H55AA107.BST
Form Factor uATX (9.6 in. x 9.6 in.)
Warranty 3 Years (First two years = parts and labor; third year = parts only)

BIOSTAR's feature set is similar to ASRock's H55M-Pro in almost every way, although ASRock managed to cram a TPM header onto their board which costs less. Other than that, you get a slightly more "expensive" 4-phase VRM solution on the BIOSTAR board courtesy of MOSFETs from International Rectifier topped off with heatsinks to keep the whole shebang cool. At a guess, we'd say that BIOSTAR's implementation is limited to a maximum of around 120 amps or so (30 amps per FET), which seems to be a ballpark figure for most H55/H57 motherboards.

At the component level, you get Realtek's ALC888 for audio and Realtek 8111D LAN—commonly found on most motherboards around the $100-$300 mark. The peripheral package is made up of three SATA cables, one SATA power cable, driver DVD and rear I/O shield. As you're paying a little bit more for fewer features on the TH55XE, the inclusion of a USB bracket would have been appreciated to make use of the internal USB headers, because you've only got four connectors available on the rear I/O panel.

Software




TOVERCLOCKER is included in the software package and allows voltage/bus speed changes, voltage/temperature monitoring, save/load of overclocking profiles and quick-touch overclocking for those who prefer automated methods. The system runs a quick stability test, ramps bus frequencies and repeats this process until the system crashes. Upon reboot the highest stable frequency is automatically selected and applied. Although the utility works, using the "V12" BIOS preset actually gave us a higher stable overclock (3.9GHz vs. 3.75GHz) than the automated tuning function, so we'd encourage you to delve into the "V" presets or manual overclocking instead.

BIOSTAR also includes a power saving utility called GPU (Green Power Utility) that works by shutting down PWM phases during light load conditions. Four performance related presets are available for use, although we did not notice much of a difference in power draw between the settings because Intel's CPUs draw so little power in light load conditions when C-states and SpeedStep are enabled in the BIOS. Power savings from phase shut-off are more apparent on boards that have higher phase counts and switching frequencies because you're contending against greater switching losses.

The Board


Motherboard layouts follows a similar story for most of the boards on test today, with most ports and connectors remaining within reach in commonly used configurations. One area where BIOSTAR seem to have gotten it wrong is in the placement of the PCI-E x4 slot on the TH55XE. It's placed directly below the x16 PEG slot, leaving no chance of using it if you decided to go with a discrete GPU. We're not fans of BIOSTAR's choice of PCI-E retention latches either, it can be very difficult to remove a graphics card for the primary PEG slot because the latch lever is blocked under most graphics card coolers.

Onboard PWM heatsinks are fastened with push-pins and although contact seemed good, we prefer vendors to use screw fittings wherever possible as there are instances where push pins don't seem to provide sufficient down-force for good contact. Everything else is placed in a friendly manner though, and you even get a couple of onboard power/reset buttons for open test beds (although that's an unlikely field of use for this board). Ordinarily, we'd prefer a CMOS battery location at the edge of a motherboard, but BIOSTAR's BIOS recovery routines are so good that we never had to clear CMOS, let alone remove the battery.

Overclocking

Memory overclocking results using the TH55XE are a little mixed. 4GB memory limits using high-end Elpida based modules come in at 188 BCLK (DDR3-1880 MHz):


There's a big problem with this overclock though; S3 resume is limited to between 160~165 BCLK using the 2:10 memory ratio with 4GB of memory and a high QPI multiplier, which is a real shame. It's probably something that BIOSTAR can address easily enough, but let's just say the TH55XE is not competitive in this department at present.

8GB memory overclocking results using the 2:10 memory ratio come in a little lower than boards from ASUS and Gigabyte. We topped out at DDR3-1510MHz for absolute stability:


We did try a combination of 200 BCLK and the 2:8 memory ratio (DDR3-1600MHz), but did not manage to find complete stability. The Gigabyte H55M-USB3 managed to pass all of our tests with ease at the same settings.

BIOS

BIOSTAR's O.N.E menu (Overclocking Navigator Engine) is where all the action takes place with a wide variety of adjustments including the CPU Core, PLL, VTT, PCH, IGP and VDimm. Clock generator skew adjustments are also available for maximum BCLK overclocking. Overclocking profiles can be saved, loaded and individually named in one of the available 10 slots. A built in BIOS flashing function is available (by pressing F12 at boot), allowing users to save and flash the BIOS from a USB or HDD easily.

Like other vendors, BIOSTAR's DRAM timing menu needs some work. Individual sub-timings lack the option of AUTO settings. To date, ASUS and Gigabyte are the only vendors providing selective automation of DRAM sub-timing functions on their H55/H57 motherboards. This is a big plus point for users that don't understand advanced DRAM timings but want to tinker with adjustments gradually.

Recovery from failed overclock settings is excellent; this is one area where BIOSTAR are the best in the business. We did not have to clear CMOS or power down the board at all to get it to recover from a failed overclock; no other vendor seems to get this area of functionality completely right.

A selection of three automated overclocking presets are also available, taking CPUs up to 145 BCLK using conservative voltage increases and memory timings allowing for a quick stable overclock without having to get down and dirty with a multitude of BIOS settings.

Fan control is only available for the CPU fan header (via BIOS/TOVERCLOCKER/TPower), offering full temperature range and speed control. Unfortunately, the SYS fan headers cannot be controlled at all and remain "full-on" all the time.

Gigabyte H57M-USB3 Overclocking
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • michal1980 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Sounds good.

    I always wondered how the referance board's preformed. And now as I get older, would consider one if its more stable out of the box then some 3rd party boards.

    When I was younger, ie worked less, had more time to tweek systems, an issue or two, or even a few wasnt a big deal. Now I'd like to be installing the OS as soon as everything is screwed togther, and not have to worry about some setting not working.
  • 7Enigma - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Thank you for finally putting these mobo companies in their place. The inability to release these boards with even rudimentary function has gone on long enough and by you not only mentioning the issues, but more importantly, by not giving awards is more than a small step in the right direction.

    While I did not fully read each and every page (I'm not currently in the market so the overview of the platform and conclusions were relevant), your analysis seemed very thorough.

    Congrats!
  • FATCamaro - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    It still doesn't seem like any of these boards is ready to build a ROCK solid stable system around like in the era of the old BX-chipset days. That said why did you not compare the intel H55 board. I would like to know how good and stable they are. I don't just mean that it can run a CPU benchmark, but how does the network and sound and usb handle wake from suspend, memory compatibility etc. I am leaning towards the intel H55 board.
  • marc1000 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    why is it so hard to choose a good board for this platform, that it takes two articles with almost 10 pages each in a graduated site like this to aid people in the choice???

    i say this platform is bogus, by design. not that the system is faulty and etc, but everything was made "so fast" that intel did not test the design properly... so, i repeat what i said in the first article: I, as consumer, will simply "skip" this generation of CPU's. maybe in the next iteration everything will be more polished.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Hi Marc,

    There's probably some blame on both sides (Intel & sub-vendors), for some of the required fixes. Stuff like AHCI, and testing if four memory modules boot or are stable are a responsibility of the sub-vendor prior to public BIOS/board release though.

    It's always wise to wait a few months before jumping on a new platform. There is room for improvement in some areas as pointed out above, but the advice to wait is ALWAYS sound.

    The reason it took 10 pages per article and the time it did is mainly down to how much testing is involved (stability, peripherals, benchmarks + the time it takes to pen it all down).


    later
    Raja

  • JonnyDough - Wednesday, February 24, 2010 - link

    Any idea how we can get OEM vendors to update their bios's for longer periods of time? Why is it we have to pay a fee to Phoenix for updated bios' when the OEM is no longer willing to carry the updated version?
  • semo - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    They keep doing the same thing over and over again. If they have that many problems with their most popular products imagine what happens to their lesser known parts.

    We've finally noticed a trend in a batch of PCs at work that keep crashing or failing to boot with Asus P5LD2-TVM-SE-SI-1394 mobos. They've admitted it finally but we've had this issue for 2 years already. We're lucky our OEM supplier can put big pressure on them but if we were a small company then we'd stand no chance of even getting an acknowledgment
  • cactusdog - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    "at least until SATA 6G peripherals are affordable"

    Western Digital have just released a 1T Sata 6Gbs drive and its not much more expensive than a Sata2 drive. A review on it would be nice.

    Anyway nice roundup.
  • Ben90 - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Because it has the exact same performance as a SATAII drive
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 22, 2010 - link

    Thanks. You're right - I should have written SATA 6G SSD's..

    regards
    Raja

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now