The Test & Results

Sapphire’s 5850 Toxic edition is clocked at 765MHz/1125MHz, a 5.5%/12.5% overclock on the core and memory respectively. So performance compared to a reference 5850 can be anywhere between no improvement (CPU limited) to a full 12.5% improvement if the bottleneck is memory bandwidth. This of course will vary from game to game.

CPU: Intel Core i7-920 @ 3.33GHz
Motherboard: Intel DX58SO (Intel X58)
Chipset Drivers: Intel 9.1.1.1015 (Intel)
Hard Disk: Intel X25-M SSD (80GB)
Memory: Patriot Viper DDR3-1333 3 x 2GB (7-7-7-20)
Video Cards: AMD Radeon HD 5970
AMD Radeon HD 5870
AMD Radeon HD 5850
AMD Radeon HD 5770
AMD Radeon HD 5750
AMD Radeon HD 5670 512MB
AMD Radeon HD 4890
AMD Radeon HD 4870 1GB
AMD Radeon HD 4850
AMD Radeon HD 3870
AMD Radeon HD 4770
AMD Radeon HD 4670 512MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Video Drivers: NVIDIA ForceWare 190.62
NVIDIA ForceWare 195.62
AMD Catalyst Beta 8.66
AMD Catalyst Beta 8.66.6
AMD Catalyst 9.9
AMD Catalyst Beta 8.69
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

The difference, as we expected, is varying from game to game. The factory overclock on the 5850 Toxic isn’t enough to significantly shift the performance of the card, but it’s enough for 5-10% better than a stock-clocked 5850.

A Quick Note on AMD & Factory Clocks Overclocking
Comments Locked

71 Comments

View All Comments

  • CptTripps - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    That sentence is cut and dry and you are really reaching to cause problems where there is none. Everyone else got what was said and did not feel the need to read between the lines because there is nothing to read.

    I got exactly this from the sentence...

    "Due to intial fab problems and no competition from Nvidia the demand for the 5xxx series has been so high that it could not be filled until now".
  • 7Enigma - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    Fanboy sit down. The sentence is clearly saying there are 2 factors as to why the demand has been so high. 1 is due to lack of inventory, and 2 is due to lack of competition. If anything it's ragging on NVIDIA a bit.

    Unbelievable what some people want to harp on!
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    Just so that everyone is clear, this is exactly what I mean (other than the ragging on NVIDIA bit).
  • blyndy - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    Incorrect. It is not clear.

    "Process problems over at TSMC and a lack of a competitive card from NVIDIA has resulted in a level of demand that until this year could not be satiated." is ambiguous -- it can easily be interpreted in a different way than to your interpretation. A hint for you: it hinges on the word 'demand'.
  • FATCamaro - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    FANBOY SIT DOWN WAS APPROPRIATE.
  • Griswold - Sunday, February 21, 2010 - link

    Shaddap nutsack, as well.
  • Rindis - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    Gratuitous caps lock was not.
  • Voo - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    I think it's absolutely clear for anyone who doesn't read his own preferences into every other sentence..
  • b15h09 - Friday, February 19, 2010 - link

    Doesn't sound too ambiguous to me. Low production and no comparative alternative means high demand. Pretty straight forward.
  • Hypernikes - Thursday, February 18, 2010 - link

    Nevermind. Looks like it was fixed.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now