Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War II

We are big fans of the Warhammer franchise, especially Dawn of War II. One of the latest RTS games in our library is also one of the more demanding titles on both the CPU and GPU. We crank all options to Ultra, enable AA, and then run the built-in performance benchmark for our result.

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II

Gaming Performance - Dawn Of War II

Far Cry 2

Featuring fantastic visuals courtesy of the Dunia Engine, this game also features one of the most impressive benchmark tools we have seen in a PC game. For single GPU results we set the performance feature set to Very High, graphics to High, and enable DX10 with 2xAA.

Gaming Performance - Far Cry 2

A surprising result, it seems the Clarkdale architecture is suited to Far Cry 2. Stock results surpass the i7-920 at 4GHz in this benchmark. We're not quite sure why this is the case, but the results are repeatable in this bench.

Resident Evil 5

For our final game benchmark we decided to add the Resident Evil 5's fixed time demo, running DX10, Ultra settings and 4xAA.

Gaming Performance - Resident Evil 5

Gaming Performance - Resident Evil 5

We're on a level playing field in this benchmark; there's a bit of scaling between 3~4GHz after which the Resident Evil engine is GPU bound.

In all three of these benchmarks, it's apparent that speeds higher than 4GHz on Clarkdale don't offer much in the way of frame rate scaling with an NVIDIA GTX 275 GPU. A more powerful GPU or an overclock of the graphics card would be required to see any gains from pushing the platform further.

Testbed Setup and Power System Benchmarks
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Hi Rick,

    I have not heard of or seen anything that offers 10 onboard SATA ports on H55 yet. If I hear of anything, I'll let you know.

    regards
    Raja
  • Rick83 - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Many thanks :-)
  • marc1000 - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Bottom line: DON'T BUY anything from Intel this generation. If you are not an advanced user who knows exactly what you are doing, then it is best to skip completely the current products.

    I'm saying this because there is a great chance you will pay more for something that offer less, or will get a crappy product, or will buy something believing it was "awesome" only to latter find it was actually "mediocre".

    This is because the RIDICULOUS naming scheme Intel has chosen to use in the current CPU+Chipset.

    Like some other user pointed here already: there is not ONE way to know if you are buing a dual or quad-core CPU simply by looking at it's name. You MUST know the exact specification based on model number (that does not mean nothing more than an obscure performance indicator).

    And the trend seems to continue with the chipsets... you get a chipset that is more expensive and with less resources but the name makes it "look" like it is better!
  • HobHayward - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Unless I'm mistaken your description of the instant boot utility is misleading. At least on my ASRock x58 extreme, the instant boot function overrides the standard shut own procedure, and instead causes the system to restart, boot all the way back into windows, and then put the system into sleep mode. This way you have a fresh boot when you return to your computer, without having to wait for a full boot.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Sorry, you are correct, I've added some text. The latter feature is akin to hibernate (suspend to disc) for fast boot.
  • michal1980 - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    I'm waiting for an editorial. The fact that you had to wait for multiple bios revisions for a STABLE build, is imho unaccetable.

    I almost bought one of these boards, and then remebered my rule, wait at least 6 months. Because mobo makers release CRAP. And no one in the industry seems to call them on it. People that work for anandtech have an insider edge for support, end users get fu*ked with shitty parts.

    Is it really that hard to launch with a stable OS? If the end user is to be a fu*king beta tester, then I want free boards.
  • YellowWing - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    I am interested in seeing more power figures for these boards with only the IGP. One of the unknowns in building a small HTPC with these boards is sizing the power supply. Many of the smaller cases come with small wattage power supplies.

    Power figures for each board with only the IGP will help size the minimum supply needed for these boards.

    I would also like to see the figures for the i3-530, which may be the most popular CPU for a HTPC build on Clarksdale
  • Bloodx - Tuesday, February 2, 2010 - link

    1080P/24 does not work correct. Until Intel releases a driver that corrects there is no point using this for an HTPC.

  • piasabird - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    So why not just use an E7500 and an integrated MATX motherboard?
    I have not seen any real comparison between that and an I3 entry level processor. My guess is besides HDMI there is not much difference. One advantage is with an older chipset you have more stability.
  • hyvonen - Monday, February 1, 2010 - link

    Why i3/i5 + H55/H57?
    1) Higher performance (both CPU and IGP).
    2) Lower power consumption at load.
    3) DTS-MA/Dolby TrueHD Bitstream support through HDMI.
    4) Dual hardware HD decoding.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now