Budget Micro-ATX P55 Faceoff: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 and ASRock P55M Pro
by Gary Key on October 5, 2009 12:30 PM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Software
ASRock provides several software applications with the P55M Pro. We will take a quick look at their OC Tuner, Intelligent Energy Saver (IES), and OC DNA.
OC Tuner
ASRock’s OC Tuner application provides health and hardware monitoring, voltage control, and overclocking capabilities. OC Tuner is actually a solid Window’s based overclocking and monitor tool. We still want the ability to save the settings to the BIOS in real time - or at least a BIOS profile setup more robust than the OC DNA tool below. The version shipped on the driver CD worked correctly, but we always suggest you keep the supplier’s utilities up to date.
Sounding like a broken record, we still prefer to tune our system within the BIOS. However, this application is useful for extracting a decent amount of performance improvement out of the system after booting into Windows. We also found the capability to adjust the CPU and Chassis fan speeds to be handy during the overclocking tests.
OC DNA
The OC DNA application allows you to save your OC profiles to the three provided user profiles within the BIOS. You can then load them from Windows (requires a reboot to set the profile) or share the OC profile with users of this board.
IES
One of the most useful features from ASRock is their Intelligent Energy Saver (IES) power management solution. ASRock provides a Windows-based software application to control IES. After installing the software (we highly recommend downloading the latest version) and a quick reboot, the application is ready for use. The control panel is powered down by default and it is up to the user to turn it on with a simple click of the IES button. IES can also be enabled within the BIOS, doing this will disable Load Line Calibration (No Vdrop).
The IES software is simple to use and easy to understand. A provided power savings meter in the top portion informs the user of current and historical power savings information. Real-time CPU power usage is available along with the processor speed. We generally found the application would save around 4W at idle, and depending up the application in use, around 20W under load conditions that leads to superb results compared to other P55 boards.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
55 Comments
View All Comments
yehuda - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
Slow POST is a minor annoyance, but it adds up as part of the computing experience IMO. I don't get why Gigabyte is so slow compared to other brands like MSI and ASRock. Just getting the video signal online takes about 4 seconds here (commenting on G31 and G41-based boards). It feels like a 486 until the OS takes over.yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
Much more interested in the MSI uATX board and the higher-level Gigabyte one that actually has all the features on it. These two may be entry-level but they also skip some features most discerning enthusiasts would want.Gary Key - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
The MSI just arrived, they were late to market for that one. The P55M-UD4 is coming up shortly, but it does not clock any better than the UD2. ;) The lack of passive MOSFET cooling was not a problem on either board under full load. The bigger problem is that the 4+1 PWM setup is not going to handle high current draws. The UD4, GD45, and MIII GENE boards are designed for that audience.MadMan007 - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
That's simple enough to understand in a basic way but could you elaborate on what *high* current means, and what the difference in ovreclocking might be? In the context of 24/7 overclocks as you go on about in this article would be best...you seem to imply in the article that the UD2 will be as good as any at 24/7-type settings but it would be nice to clarify when 'high' current is an advantage.yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
Cool, looking forward to that UD4 review =)I wonder if the extra features will be considered worth the price difference, although it sounds like you do not believe so.
The onboard audio is one area i've heard several complaints for cheapest Gigabyte boards compared to the mid-level and upper-tier boards.
MadMan007 - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
What exactly were the issues or differences in the audio? Features or sound quality?yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
at the moment i can't find either of the reviews i read a couple weeks ago, but both stated sound quality issues with the onboard solution, which is a lower grade than what is included on the other boards.philosofool - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
I have one of these boards and the sound is great. I'm listening to Little Milton (Grits Ain't Groceries) right now: I can hear every horn, bass string, cymbal crash like I'm sitting on stage. Okay, maybe that's an exaggeration, but there's nothing wrong with the audio on this board.yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
To be more specific, there are reviews on other sites mentioning the particularly crappy onboard audio solution on the UD2 compared to the UD4, and there's also the lack of cooling on the VRMs.On the upside, sure, it uses slightly less operating power, and that can be important to users interested in uATX, but overall I'd rather spend another $20 or whatever to get the UD4 with better cooling and audio (and whatever else it adds).
yacoub - Monday, October 5, 2009 - link
Awesome work with the review, Gary. I do wish the uATX boards would stop carrying legacy ports like others have noted. Floppy is definitely archaic, IDE should be the next item tossed, and PCI could probably go as well. FireWire is also something 99% of us could live without on a uATX board that offers USB and eSATA.