Final Words

When it comes to overclocking, NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 275 is a capable part. Other people out there have gotten higher core speeds than we did but we achieved a very high shader clock. Our memory speed was also decent. And with this test the overclocked GTX 275 shows it can compete with an overclocked Radeon HD 4890: the GTX 275 never trailed NVIDIA's own GTX 285 while the Radeon HD 4890 fell behind in a couple instances.

At the same time, while the 4890 doesn't always lead the GTX 285, when the 4890 does lead it also typically leads the fully overclocked GTX 275 as well. These parts trade blows, and it is difficult to say that one is hands down better than the other. It really depends on the game and what you need out of the hardware.

We did find the AMD hardware easier to quickly and efficiently tweak. Some of that may have to do with the fact that we only had two sliders to worry about, but the built in stress test is a nice plus. Of course, NVIDIA automatically tests the clocks when you try and set them, but it seemed like it would sometimes arbitrarily decide not to let us set a clock speed we had set before. Setting three different clocks can give us more control over the overclocking process, but that can be tough when we still don't know exactly the best way to balance these.

Our suggestion is to start with the core and get it as high as you can. After that, crank up your shader. Last would be memory. But you will definitely want to make sure you've got all three turned up at least a little to get the amplifying benefit these hardware resources have on each other.

Those hoping we would definitively recommend either NVIDIA or AMD for overclocking will be disappointed, as this just isn't the blowout necessary for that. Both camps have pluses and minuses, and readers should take that into account when making a purchasing decision. Additionally, we do want to stress that every retail card is different; there may be some AMD parts that can overclock higher than the one we tested, and there may be NVIDIA hardware that can achieve better results as well.

Regardless of what else comes into play, overclocking looks good on both the Radeon HD 4890 and the GeForce GTX 275.

Power Consumption
Comments Locked

43 Comments

View All Comments

  • SiliconDoc - Monday, June 22, 2009 - link

    Not only does the gtx275 beat the 4890, but the gtx260 beats the 4870 !
    http://www.techspot.com/review/164-radeon-4890-vs-...">http://www.techspot.com/review/164-radeon-4890-vs-...
    ..
    Oh gee, I guess I should follow dereks chart instead... ( GAG ! )
  • SiliconDoc - Monday, June 8, 2009 - link

    " Given the performance and pricing of Phenom II and the upcoming Radeon 5000 series, if AMD does not pull into black [records a profit] and achieves great sales success, we don't know what needs to happen in order for AMD to actually earn some serious money. "
    LOL
    Will ATI ever make a profit ? We keep hearing how smart they are and how they can really make money while NVidia's monster vore costs nvidia so much ! LOL
    Awwww- poor ati can't make dime one while nvidia keeps posting profits...
    http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/6/3/ati-...">http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/20...-has-the...
    ----
    Any red roosters gonna stop crowing about smaller gpu cores and their savings for ATI who loses money every single quarter, anytime soon ?
    Probably NOT - they're so smart, so wise about making gpu's.

  • SiliconDoc - Saturday, June 6, 2009 - link

    Better be careful - from their 4890 extravaganza overclock article they did first and used the results in this comparison against nvidia:
    -
    " We absolutely must caution our readers once again that these are not off-the-shelf retail parts. These are parts sent directly to us from manufacturers and could very likely have a higher overclocking potential than retail parts. "
    YES WE KNOW - NOW YOU'VE TRANSFERRED YOUR RESULTS HERE AGAINST A 703 CORE THAT IS LOWER THAN THE FTW EVGA GTX275 you can but stock faster!
    ---
    You had BETTER look at a few other places that aren't so GD biased it's built in - and Derek is insanely red rooster fan boyed, and hates Nvidia, obviously, like so many little cluckers here for over a year now.-
    ---
    Jeepers- a special 4890 up against non overclocked gtx275 in the 4890 article, then transfer the special results here, and put NOT a regular clocked 4890 as in the other article to be half fair - but jam the massive results in from the special cards they got...
    ---
    I'm mean you really can't screw it up much worse than that.
    They did their best red rooster bias blab possible, I'll say that much for em, and covered it up as best they could.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now