So Close to Greatness

Okay, analogy time. Putting together a notebook is a lot like building a sandwich. You don't want to have too much bread, but you need something to hold everything together. Then you add your meat, cheese, vegetables, and condiments. All things need to be balanced properly, so you don't want too much meat and not enough other stuff, and we certainly don't want to overpower the taste of the meat and cheese with too much mustard or vinegar. If you're trying for a gourmet sandwich, you also want to use top-quality ingredients in all areas, whereas if you just want a typical Subway style sandwich you don't need to be as finicky. Finally, when everything is put together it should look nice - no one wants a sandwich that's falling apart and gloopy. In short, you need to find balance and harmony among the various ingredients.

So what about notebooks? Particularly in the area of gaming notebooks, component selections need to make sense. There's little point in using a top-end processor with an underpowered graphics subsystem if the goal is high frame rates. Similarly, you wouldn't want dual graphics chips connected to a budget processor. Games are also quite large, so unless we are putting together a no-holds-barred laptop we will take the lower price per gigabyte of conventional storage over solid-state drives. The chassis is the bread that holds everything together, and you certainly don't want any mold there. Finally, the system needs to look nice, especially the parts that you will stare at whenever you use the laptop - i.e. the LCD.


In terms of balance, the MSI GT627 does just about everything right. It has a great set of features and performance, at a great price point. The combination of CPU, GPU, hard drive, and memory works extremely well. A few areas could use improvements, but for $1100 we're willing to cut MSI some slack. The closest competition is the Gateway P-7805u, and at $1150 we really need to compare these two laptops.

Both have similar flaws in some areas, like the poor quality LCD. Otherwise, the component list is practically identical. Gateway does come out ahead in several areas, like shipping with 64-bit Vista installed, DDR3 memory, a slightly faster GPU, better battery life, and a higher resolution LCD. On the other hand, MSI wins in terms of size and weight, and performance at the native LCD resolution will basically be a tie. MSI also includes a 15% overclock with their Turbo mode, which is a nice extra. Unfortunately for Gateway, the P-7805u also happens to be backordered.

If we forget about availability for a minute, based on performance and features it would be very close to a tossup, with a slight edge to Gateway. However, those looking for a lighter chassis would prefer the MSI GT627. There's just one problem that keeps us from making that recommendation: the keyboard. Some people might not mind the springiness, but it's a major turnoff for me. It's like finding a bunch of worms crawling around in a loaf of bread - you might be willing to just toss the bad pieces, but you'll probably just trash the entire loaf. The price is almost enough to make me overlook the keyboard, and if you can find a laptop to try out in person that will be your best answer to this quandary. Personally, I could never be happy with the keyboard as it stands. It's likely you can jury rig something to help mitigate the problem, but should users really be required to do that on an $1100 notebook? We don't think so but feel free to disagree.

The MSI GT627 brushes up against greatness, but ultimately it fails to achieve that mark. Let's recap what they need to fix in order to move from being close to receiving an outright recommendation. First is that they have to fix the keyboard, and I'd be happier if the Fn and CTRL keys swapped places. Second, at the very least the LCD should offer a 500:1 contrast ratio. Those two changes would be enough to garner an Editors' Choice award, provided the price doesn't change much - or give us a 1440x900 IPS LCD panel and it would get a Gold Editors' Choice award. Finally, a little bit more durability on some of the plastic pieces would be good; we might have just been unlucky, but we really didn't do anything that should have cracked the plastic on the front bezel (unless catching a flight with a laptop is too extreme).

For now, if you're looking for a notebook like this, we continue to recommend the Gateway P-7805u - assuming you can find it in stock. If you don't mind the springy keyboard, however, you might be intrigued by the MSI GT627-218US laptop (we reviewed the MSI GT627-216US). The 218US ups the ante with a P8600 CPU, Blu-ray reader/DVDRW combo drive, and a WSXGA+ (1680x1050) LCD, all for just $1330. Since we haven't tested the 218US we can't comment on the LCD, but if it offers a better contrast ratio that's enough to warrant a serious look. Still a shame about the keyboard, though.

Ugh... Another Low Contrast TN Panel
Comments Locked

47 Comments

View All Comments

  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    Anand tested the MacBooks - he's the Mac person around here - and outside of battery life there really aren't any tests we can run on the Macs without installing Vista. As mentioned in the past, MacBooks running Vista also have battery life problems (they get about half the battery life they achieve under OS X). So why are they in where they excel? I thought it would be obvious: we want the Windows vendors to catch up to Apple, whatever it takes. If Apple can do it with a certain set of components, others can do the same thing.

    There's little point in installing Vista on a MacBook just to run all these tests. Frankly, you can look at the specs of a notebook and generally guess within a few percent how it will perform. A MacBook with a P8400 CPU is going to be about the same as a Vista laptop with the same CPU.
  • IlllI - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    i like the laptop display quality tests, would it be possible to also test the quality of the macbook display and post the results?
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    If I can get Anand to part with one of his MacBooks for a week or two.... :-D (He's in North Carolina; I'm in Washington. We typically see each other maybe a couple days a year.)
  • Hulk - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    I agree with you 100%. We need quality displays on laptops!

    Thank you for pushing this issue.
  • andrezunido - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    Nice review, seems like a well rounded notebook for the price but I wouldn't mind paying a little extra 100$-200$ for a decent screen I mean its not even LED backlit.
    I mostly use my laptop for programming work and the screen (apart from battery life - I like the freedom of working anywhere) is a major concern for me, the manufacturers tend to neglect its importance making it a premium/luxury of top of the range laptops (i.e. Apple's macbook pro 15 and 17 - this later being the only with matte option, Asus U2, Dell), all being over the ~2000$ mark.

    Anyway, nice, balanced feature set (the overclock button is a nice touch), might consider buying one given its competitive price to do some gaming.
  • Hrel - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    The Macs start at $2K!!! At least with PC you get choices, and more customization and better compatibility. Also anandtech did a review of a laptop not too long ago with the best laptop screen they'd ever seen; pretty sure it was from dell.
  • niva - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    Well I personally think the 32 bit vista is a big no-no at this stage. I don't care if some apps still have problems working under 64 bit vista, I want to use the extra gig of ram and I want to be able to upgrade the RAM and use it w/o having to swipe the OS.

    Does MS offer a free upgrade of 32 bit vista to 64 bit vista on machines like this one? Or does one have to fork out the cost for the 64 bit OS?
  • Lord 666 - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    I received a free copy of Vista Ultimate last year at a Microsoft "Heros Happen Here" event. Tried to get the 64bit disc for it but was told by MS the SKU I have is not entitled for 64bit media.

    Judging by that alone, I highly doubt MS will offer 64bit upgrades in the future as they did with XP in 2005. Their 64bit coming out party really is Windows 7.
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    I had a desktop that came with Vista 32-bit installed, and at some point the installation became corrupted. Just for kicks, I decided to try installing Vista 64-bit instead, using the RTM DVD. That worked fine with the code on the box. I don't know if that would work in other instances, though.
  • IlllI - Wednesday, April 29, 2009 - link

    maybe one day you can review one of these http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9050...">http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp...&typ... or http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=9173...">http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp...&typ...
    looks like they are the same except one uses a P7450 and the other a P8400.

    either seem to be very similar to the msi, except the asus comes with 512mb on the gs as opposed to 1gb with the msi. also as you can see the asus is a tad cheaper.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now