BIOS Breakdown

 

Extreme Cooling

This function is only to be used when the CPU is cooled to subzero temperatures. Three settings are available depending upon the temperature range the CPU will be operating at for benchmarking. An alternative to this BIOS function is to move the onboard X-Cool jumper to pins 2-3, although the effects can be a little different to those offered in the BIOS. Our particular i7-920 CPU prefers the X-Cool jumper left at position 1-2, needing no change in the BIOS to reach the limits of thermal shutdown conditions. On the other hand, our i7-965XE processor prefers the X-Cool jumper at position 2-3. For us, we found we were able to boot and run our i7 processors another 10~15 degrees lower on the Classified than the cold boot limits imposed by other boards with these same CPUs.

PCI Express Frequency

This is useful when pushing the board beyond 222 BCLK. A setting of 102MHz will allow the BCLK frequency to be ramped past 222MHz using the E-LEET tuning program in the OS. For speeds past 230 BCLK, we used a setting of 114MHz. You can then boot into the OS at 220 BCLK and apply BCLK changes to take you directly to the desired CPU frequency. The use of high PCI-E bus frequencies does affect 3D stability however; too high and 3D benchmarks will lock mid-run. Settings over 117MHz or so give rise to SATA problems at times, so it's a case of edging up slowly and keeping your fingers crossed if you're going for an all out attempt at a maximum BCLK setting.

Profiles

Eight CMOS profile slots are available for saving your settings. Unfortunately, there is no way to name the saved profile for easy reference, which would have been a nice touch. Still, having these banks on hand makes it easy to re-apply previous settings when experimenting.

 

Memory Control Setting

Enabled: Allows manual control of Memory Frequency, Channel Interleave, and Rank Interleave.

Memory Frequency: This is the memory multiplier ratio to BCLK. It's self-explanatory based on the ratios and speeds listed. For those just starting on the i7 platform, a memory ratio of 10 (1333) and a base BCLK speed of 133 will result in a DDR3-1333 (10x133) memory speed as one example. As you clock up bus speeds, you will need to lower the memory ratio to keep your memory operating within specifications.

Memory Timing: EVGA has managed to find a number of memory controller presets based on the applied memory frequency. Our testing to date has shown no real performance gains between any of the presets other than stability, so we're veering towards calling this a signal timing offset rather than a latency adjustment. At stock processor speeds (133 BCLK), one can use the appropriate memory divider and MCH frequency setting to obtain the stock memory frequency. If you intend to experiment with individual MCH frequency settings then do note that if using the 1867 and 2133MHz presets that memory frequency must be close to the speed of the MCH preset. As an example:

BCLK 133MHz
Memory Multiplier 2:14
Uncore Multiplier 28
MCH "strap" = 1867
MemFreq =1867MHz
…POSTs

BCLK 133MHz
Memory Multiplier 2:10
Uncore Multiplier 20
MCH "strap" = 1867
MemFreq =1330MHz
…Fails to POST.

But:

BCLK 186MHz
Memory Multiplier 2:10
Uncore Multiplier 20
MCH "strap" = 1867
MemFreq =1860
…also will POST.

If memory frequency is below MCH "strap" frequency using the 1867 preset, then the minimum consistent boot up memory frequency is in the region of 1770MHz. Memory speeds over the MCH preset frequency are not as susceptible to non-post situations. The 1600MHz preset seems to be the most scalable and stable preset in our testing to date. Values in between the presets are catered for using the "by DRAM ratio" setting, which scales signal timing offsets in conjunction with memory frequency and BCLK.

Channel Interleave: Higher values divide memory blocks and spread contiguous portions of data across interleaved channels, thereby increasing potential read bandwidth as requests for data can be made to all interleaved channels in an overlapped manner. For benchmarking purposes when using three memory modules, a 4-way interleave may surpass the scoring performance of setting 6-way interleave depending on the benchmark and operating system used (32-bit vs. 64-bit). We did find however that a 6-way interleave was capable of a higher overall BCLK for Super PI 32M than using a 4-way interleave setting (unless of course you run single- or dual-channel and appropriate channel interleaving thus decreasing load upon the memory controller).

Rank Interleave: Interleaves physical ranks of memory so that a rank can be accessed while another is being refreshed. Performance gains again depend on the benchmark in question. For 24/7 systems using triple-channel memory configurations there is no advantage to setting this value below 4 while Channel Interleave should be left at 6 for best overall system performance.

The rest of the memory parameters pretty much default to optimum levels; moving away from these values can in some instances make matters worse in terms of system stability rather than performance. The current BIOS defaults are just about optimal for most overclocking. The highest performance advantage comes from changing the primary memory timings. There's little to no gain in fiddling with any of the secondary timing ranges, other than moving tRFC out to a value of 88 or more if running 12GB (6x2GB) of memory.

Does the NF200 hurt performance? More BIOS Stuff
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • CK804 - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    This motherboard costs $400-$450 and it comes with Realtek audio and LAN? Give me a break. I would at the very least expect a dedicated audio card for this price.
  • GaryJohnson - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    And if you load it up with 4x GPUs, I don't think you actually have a slot available for any other expansion cards. They really need to move to some kind of new, longer form factor for boards like this. Something like a 16" x 9.6" 'LATX' form factor.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    The only way you'll get 4x GPUs is via 2x GeForce GTX 295 or 2x Radeon HD 4870X2... in which case you would have several expansion slots remaining. But as our SLI/CF scaling articles have shown, outside of bragging rights in a few select titles there's little point in going beyond two-way GPU configurations.
  • legoman666 - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    2 8pin power connectors on the mobo? Why?
  • 1078feba - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    How about 600W of available power to the proc socket?
  • takumsawsherman - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    Clearly, this board appears to be for crazy people. You spend $400 and you still get old school Firewire 400? At that price, there should be no compromises. Firewire800, and also somebody's soul. Or something.
  • bigboxes - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    Is this all that you have to gripe about? Were you really going to purchase this board, but now suddenly you can't justify it due to this obvious oversight? :eyeroll: Seriously, I bought a 4-port firewire card in the past that sits in a box. Why? Cuz I never EVER used the thing. USB 2.0 will suffice until USB 3.0. Even Apple computers have more USB jacks than Firewire. If you want a function that hardly anyone uses than just buy an expansion card. I am certain the target for this mobo is not one that gives a rats about Firewire. They are gamers. They can always use e-SATA if they need faster transfer speeds in an external.
  • Exar3342 - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    This board is for people that spend $1000.00 on a cpu and have 3-4 GTX 285's, and have spent a ton on a cooling setup. I really doubt they will notice an extra $150.00 for the motherboard.
  • ToeCutter - Thursday, March 26, 2009 - link

    Exactly. I'm thinking of snagging one of these just for the simple color scheme that doesn't look like a bag of Starburst.

    How about just a jet black PCB and some monotone slots.

    Skip a sushi dinner and it's paid for....?
  • Nfarce - Friday, February 27, 2009 - link

    While that may be true, said people are becoming fewer and far between these days, and some of those who could afford such machines are probably scaling back their spending (the smart ones anyway). The days of people ordering $3,000+ worth of stuff and putting it on their credit cards and paying it off monthly are numbered. People need to learn to live within their means so we don't get in this huge economic global mess again.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now