4x200m Gaming Relay

We also ran several of the games at higher detail settings to put more of a load on the graphics cards. Not surprisingly, performance often becomes unacceptable at higher resolutions and detail settings with these laptops, depending on the game. The GeForce 9800M GTS may be one of the fastest mobile graphics chips currently available, but it's still slower than a single desktop 9600 GT 512MB because of the more stringent power requirements and lower clock speeds.

As anyone who plays PC games can tell you, there are plenty of titles on the market that will require more than a single graphics chip in order to provide acceptable performance at 1920x1200 - or you'll need an HD 4870 or GTX 280. We'll also include 3DMark results here for reference; we put a lot more stock in gaming performance than in 3DMark results, but at least 3DMark results are easily generated and easily compared.











Futuremark 3DMark03

Futuremark 3DMark05

Futuremark 3DMark06

Futuremark 3DMark Vantage

The patterns on the previous page are continued for the most part, although we now see that Assassin's Creed DX10 also appears to be GPU bandwidth limited. Company of Heroes tends to be too sluggish at higher resolution with DX10, and Crysis is clearly too demanding at High settings. If you want a laptop that can handle all of these games and provide reasonable performance, you'll have to consider the multi-GPU offerings. A more practical approach would probably be to turn down detail settings until you get acceptable performance. For example, Crysis at Medium detail looks very good, and turning down a few of the settings can easily net you performance of over 50 FPS.

Standard Gaming Performance General Application Performance
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • solgae1784 - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    If you look at the magazines, Gateway's track record hasn't been that impressive, scoring pretty low on many aspects. So I'd be a little more wary when you're considering them. Your experience may be different from what the responses were after all.
  • Adamantine - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    http://geek-news.net/2008/07/nvidia-geforce-9700m-...

    All of the press releases, like the one I referenced above, concerning how many shaders are in the new 9800M chips states that the GTS is 64 shaders, GT 96 shaders, GTX 112 shaders.
  • Adamantine - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_9800m_gts.htm...">http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_9800m_gts.htm... 64 SP's
    http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_9800m_gt.html">http://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_9800m_gt.html 96 SP's

    Confirming that the press release is accurate, at least on the SP count.

    BTW, Gateway has never used a GTX in any of their gaming notebooks.

    Way too many mistakes in this review.
  • JarredWalton - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    Lack of details from NVIDIA is partly to blame. Wrapping things up at 2AM is another issue. While there were admittedly some errors on the number of SPs (caused by NVIDIA's crazy naming decisions), the vast majority of the text is correct. I have also added the clock speeds, now that I was able to access both laptops again. (I was out of town on family matters, so I was wrapping things up without access to the hardware.)

    Initially, I thought the GPU in the 7811 was more SPs but with a lower core/shader clock relative to 8800M GTS, but it turns out it's the same number of shaders as the 8800M GTS but with a 20% higher core clock (600MHz compared to 500MHz). Also worth noting is that I had all of the SP counts correct in my http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=335...">mobile buyer's guide, so this was just a slip caused by the confusing names.
  • Adamantine - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    "One alternative was to simply shop online and purchase a similarly configured notebook from Gateway, and although the price was a few hundred dollars more you also got some upgrades. TigerDirect.com also carries many Gateway notebooks, including the P-173X FX for $1350, which bumps the processor up to a T7500."

    This isn't entirely accurate. The Best Buy version has always had a identical Gateway Direct version, 6831 = P-171, 6860 = P-172. The P-173X has no Best Buy equivalent and could be bought direct from Gateway around the first/second week of May. The P-173X became available through online retailers when Gateway ceased their direct sales operation.

    On the specs page, the 7811 FX is listed as having a 8900M GTS, which should be 9800M GTS.
  • djc208 - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    I think there are quite a few situations where you might need a gaming laptop (not like you "need" food of course but you know what I mean).
    I've been reading with interest because I have to go on travel for 6-8 months next year. I'll want something to play my games on but don't want to ship my desktop system out with me. This could be worth the investment and a huge upgrade from my current notebook.
  • sephiroth135 - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    Page 2, 3rd table

    NVIDIA GeForce 8900M GTS 512MB

    should be

    9800M
  • homerdog - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    Same mistake on page 3.
  • fabarati - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    The 9800m GT is just a rebranded 8800m GTX. So it is a faster card than the 9800m GTS.
  • fabarati - Friday, August 15, 2008 - link

    Ohterwise, good review.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now