Power Consumption

NVIDIA's idle power optimizations do a great job of keeping their very power hungry parts sitting pretty when in 2D mode. Many people I know just leave their computers on all day and generally playing games 24 hours a day is not that great for the health. Idle power is important, especially as energy costs rise, and taking steps to ensure that less power is drawn when less power is needed is a great direction to move in. AMD's 4870 hardware is less power friendly, but 4850 is pretty well balanced at idle.

Moving on to load power.

These numbers are peak power draw experienced over multiple runs of 3dmark vantage's third feature test (pixel shaders). This test heavily loads the GPU while being very light on the rest of the system so that we can get as clear a picture of relative GPU power draw as possible. Playing games will incur much higher system level power draw as the CPU, memory, drives and other hardware may also start to hit their own peak power draw at the same time. 4850 and 4870 CrossFire both require large and stable PSUs in order to play actual games.  

Clearly the 4870 is a power junky posting the second highest peak power of any card (second only to NVIDIA's GTX 280). While a single 4870 draws more power than the 9800 GX2, quad SLI does peak higher than 4870 crossfire. 4850 power draw is on par with its competitors, but 4850 crossfire does seem to have an advantage in power draw over the 9800 GTX+.

Heat and Noise

These cards get way too hot. I keep burning my hands when I try to swap them out, and Anand seems to enjoy using recently tested 4800 series cards as space heaters. We didn't look at heat data for this article, but our 4850 tests show that things get toasty. And the 4870 gets hugely hot.

The fans are kind of quiet most of the time, but some added noise for less system heat might be a good trade off. Even if it's load, making the rest of a system incredibly hot isn't really the right way to go as other fans will need to work harder and/or components might start to fail.

The noise level of the 4850 fan is alright, but when the 4870 spins up I tend to glance out the window to make sure a jet isn't just about to fly into the building. It's hugely loud at load, but it doesn't get there fast and it doesn't stay there long. It seems AMD favored cooling things down quick and then returning to quiet running.

Multi-GPU Performance in Assassin's Creed, Oblivion, The Witcher & Bioshock Final Words
Comments Locked

215 Comments

View All Comments

  • Amiga500 - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    Apple has passed over control of Open CL to the Khronos group, which manage open sourced coding.

    To all intentions and purposes, it is open source. :-)
  • emergancyexit - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    i hope you do 3x crossfire can do. maybe a 4x 4850 vs 3x GTX 260 just to satisfy us readers for the moment would be lovely!
  • DerekWilson - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    i'm not sure if this is supported out of the box ... ill have to check it out ...
  • emergancyexit - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    i would really like to know what type of performance theese cards could get in an MMO. (and hopefully compare them to some cheaper cards) Games im interested in are some of the newer titles like Age of conan ( i hear it's graphics are great and is a workout for even a 8800 ultra) And Eve-online (thier new graphics engine works cards pretty hard too)

    MMO's Graphics usually get pretty intesive with some odd 200+ characters flying around shooting fireballs evrywhere with missles sailing through the air in a land of hundreds of monsters as far as the eye can see. it can get pretty demanding on a gameing computer, just as much (if not more) as a hit new title.

    for example, on my current Rig i can get around 50FPS steady at 1440x900 but on Eve-Online i get 35 at the most at peacefull times and 20 or even 15 in a large fight with FEW graphics options selected.
  • MIP - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    Great review, the 4870 looks to be fantastic value. However, we're missing the 'heat and noise' part.
  • skiboysteve - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    Not only do these cards rock, but I wouldn't be surprised if AMD has an ace up its sleeve with the 4870x2... with that crossfire interconnect directly connected to the data hub that you showed on the chart. That and the fact that they have been looking forward to this crossfire strategy of attacking the high end for quite some time so they might have some tricky driver stuff coming with it.

    I have been disappointed with the heat and power consumption of these cards. But:
    1) Someone said powerplay is getting a driver tweak and, I can always clock them lower in 2D than 500/1000 (which is insane for 2d)
    2) That hardware site someone linked earlier showed a more than 50% reduction in temperatures with an aftermarket cooler! Thats insane!!

    And finally, if I can get the 1 & 2 fixed... I want to know how well these babys overclock. If I can get a 4850 running like a 4870 or better... yum. And in that case, how high will a 4870 OC? And I want to know this with a non stock cooler, because apparently the stock ones suck. With a non stock cooler if the 4850 clocks up to 4870 level, but the 4870 clocks way up too... i'm gonna have to grab a 4870.

    So yeah, fix #1 and #2 and find me non-stock cooler OC #s and I'll go buy one (maybe two?) when nehalem comes out
  • Powered by AMD - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    Impressive review, Thanks :)
    A few glitches:
    It says "Power Consumption, Heat and Noise", but the graphs only shows Power Consuption.
    In Page 17 (The Witcher), in second paragraph, it says 390X2 instead of 3870.

    Thanks again.
    Cheers from Argentina.
  • Conscript - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    atleast that was the tile of the second to last page...but only see two power consumption graphs?
  • Proteusza - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    I quote one Kristopher Kubricki regarding whether the RV770 is inferior to the GT200:

    "It is. Even AMD isn't going to tell you otherwise. You can debate this all you want, but it's still a $200 video card."

    So, please tell me now why I should pay $650 for a GTX280. I'm struggling to see the logic here.

    Source: http://www.dailytech.com/Update+AMD+Preps+Radeon+4...">http://www.dailytech.com/Update+AMD+Pre...50+Launc...
    (near the bottom)
  • AbRASiON - Wednesday, June 25, 2008 - link

    I can live with a greedier card than my 8800GT but I refuse to put up with a noisy machine.

    Any comments on the heat and noise please? would be nice!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now