HD Tune Pro 3.00




In our read tests, the Samsung/OCZ drive is within striking range of the lightning quick drive from Memoright. The average read rate of 87.2 MB/s is about 27% slower than the Memoright drive, but is around 45% faster than the previous drive from Samsung. On a side note, the WD VelociRaptor has an average read rate of 101.6 MB/s.




In our write speed tests, the Memoright drive offers a maximum write speed that is 41% faster, average write speed is 63% quicker, and burst rates are about 49% lower, something we are still investigating. As a comparison, average write speeds on the WD VelociRaptor are 101.4 MB/s with maximum speed at 122.1 MB/s and access time of 7.0ms. However, for the most part, the new Samsung/OCZ drives have write speeds that are now comparable with the majority of the latest 7200RPM mechanical drives. This is a significant improvement over the previous 64GB SSD drive from Samsung that featured average write rates near 36 MB/s.

We have included a selection of results from our HD Tune benchmarks in image galleries for those that are interested in comparing the Samsung/OCZ 64GB SSD against the latest 32GB SSD from Memoright. Our test results are at 32kb, 512kb, 8MB, and 128MB file sizes. Of note, in the 32kb test, the Samsung/OCZ drive performs exceptionally well in the 64/128 range and like most SSD drives, we see a significant decrease in write throughput at the 64 range on the Memoright drive.

Run Silent, Run Cool Vantage Benchmark Champion
Comments Locked

38 Comments

View All Comments

  • tim851 - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    Seeing as all drives are quite close in load times I think it's safe to assume, that we've reach the apex and the load times are pretty much bottlenecked by CPU speed now.

    Most real world application performance numbers are pretty close these days, there aren't any dead slow hard disks anymore. Flash won't bring us more speed, but less power draw and noise.
  • FITCamaro - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    I got a pair of 74GB Raptors for $150. I'm quite happy with my load times. Even in the Age of Conan beta, my load times were pretty quick.
  • araczynski - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    nothing mainstream about a $1000 64gb drive.
  • piroroadkill - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    I agree, it's definitely good, but it's not $1000 good
  • JarredWalton - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    More "mainstream" than a $4000 64GB SSD. :)
  • dingetje - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    sorry, this is about as mainstream to the st0rage industry as brasilian fart p0rn is to the p0rn market.

    nice article by the way, thanks ;)
  • AssBall - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    Yes, but the key is that now you can store and access your fart Pr0n even faster!
  • retrospooty - Friday, May 16, 2008 - link

    dang... I didnt even know there was such a thing as brazillian fart porn. I need to get out more !

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now