Test Setup

ASUS Maximus Extreme
Standard Testbed
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Quad-core, 2.4GHz, 2x4MB Unified Cache, 9x Multiplier, 1066FSB
CPU Voltage 1.200V
Cooling Thermalright 120 Extreme
Power Supply OCZ 1000W
Memory Corsair CM3x1024-1800C7D (4GB)
Memory Settings 4-4-4-12 1N (DDR3-1066 Base)
Video Cards MSI HD X2900 XT 512MB
Video Drivers ATI Catalyst 7.10
Hard Drive Western Digital 7200RPM 750GB SATA 3/Gbps 16MB Buffer
Optical Drives Plextor PX-B900A, Toshiba SD-H802A
Case CoolerMaster Stacker 830 Evo
BIOS 0803
Operating System Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit
.

ASUS Maximus Extreme
Quad-Core Overclocking / Benchmark Testbed
Processor Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800
Quad-core, 2.93GHz, 2x4MB Shared Cache, 11x Multiplier, 1066FSB
CPU Voltage 1.275V
Cooling Swiftech Apogee GTX, Thermochill PA120.3 radiator, dual Laing DDC Ultra pumps in series, 1/2" ID (3/4" OD) Tygon tubing, 3x Panaflo 120x38mm fans @ 7-12v in push configuration
Power Supply OCZ Pro Xstream 1000w, PCP&C 1200w
Memory OCZ DDR3 PC3-14400 (DDR-1800) Platinum Edition (2G/4GB)
Memory Settings 4-4-4-12 1N (DDR3-1066 Base)
Video Cards MSI 8800 Ultra (660/1050 for Overclocking)
Video Drivers NVIDIA 169.09
Hard Drive Western Digital 7200RPM 250GB - WD2500KS
Optical Drives Plextor PX-755A
Case CoolerMaster Stacker 830 Evo
BIOS 0803
Operating System Windows XP Professional SP2
.

We decided to use our base QX6800 CPU with our standard tests run on the 9x multiplier to simulate the attractively priced Q6600 CPU and to match previous benchmark results. In this section of testing, we aim to remain within realistic cooling capacity temperatures and current CPU stepping capabilities. This better shows an overall picture of motherboard performance potential using widely available parts. With such a vast array of overclocking BIOS functions at our disposal, we decided to stick with a single operating system environment.

We selected Microsoft Windows XP SP2 due to its maturity, taking away some of the time burden looking for possible software level conflicts that may exist on a newer OS (though we ventured to run our standard Vista test suite for the non-overclocking benchmarks). This does not mean the board cannot work with Vista when overclocking; we are just trying to eliminate possible downtime on non-motherboard/BIOS related issues. There's also the fact that a vast majority of overclocking enthusiasts have not switched to Vista (yet).

We ran 1280x1024 resolution game benchmark tests in order to cross-compare CPU MHz related gains in our board specific tests. We utilize new drive images on each board in order to minimize any potential driver conflicts. Our 3DMark results utilize the standard benchmark resolution for each program. We run each benchmark five times, throw out the two low and high scores, and report the remaining score to reflect a repeatable average. We limited our standard Vista test suite to a few benchmark results to indicate the general performance of this board when compared to current P35 motherboards.

Since the ASUS Maximus Extreme is for the overclocker and gamer as opposed to your typical internet browsing activities, we decided to take a different look at this board and focus on overclocking for this particular article with results compared to the P35/X38 motherboards we have reviewed recently. Memory timings used for the tests are as follows: 9x266 = 4-4-4-12 1N, 9x333 = 5-5-5-15 1N and 9x400 = 6-6-6-15 1N.

ASUS Maximus Extreme Board Layout and Features Futuremark Performance
Comments Locked

27 Comments

View All Comments

  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    Wireless works yes. They are linked up through the base and work in dos mode. Both RF, and bluetooth meese work.
  • kilkennycat - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    I notice from the board picture that the rear mounting holes are still in the corners of the board, so if the WIDTH is 4cm more than the standard ATX, does the board need special mounting ? I assume that WIDTH means the distance across the edge of the board in contact with the rear of the case. Please correct if my assumption is wrong.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    THe width is the length across the top edge of the board. Screw hole spacing is still standard ATX, just that this board over-hangs by a few cm (the Sata port end will protrude further into your case) ...

    regards
    Raja
  • kilkennycat - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    As yes, you actually mean DEPTH of course, if referencing tower case dimensions (Height x Width x Depth). So any case wishing to accommodate this board needs to have at least 4cm DEEPER front to rear clearance for the motherboard, nothing to do with it being a mid-tower or full-tower. Am I right?

    Might also preclude using this MB in those cases having the motherboard mounted on a slide-in ATX tray ( a great feature, btw ), as they may have a lip or other registration hardware on the leading-edge of the tray.
  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    What size are they? I cant find it here, or on Asus's site. They look like 1/4 inch - which kind of sucks.
  • Rajinder Gill - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    The fittings are 1/4", but ASUS does provide adapetrs to use 1/2 tubing..

    Raja..

  • retrospooty - Monday, December 10, 2007 - link

    thanks... bummer. 1/4 restricts my flow.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now