The Rest of the Tests

If you want the exact test results that we used to generate the Conroe vs. Penryn chart a few pages back, those graphs follow without interruption:

General Usage Performance - SYSMark 2007

General Usage Performance - SYSMark 2007

General Usage Performance - SYSMark 2007

General Usage Performance - SYSMark 2007

General Usage Performance - SYSMark 2007

Media Encoding Performance - DivX 6.6

Media Encoding Performance - Windows Media Encoder 9

Media Encoding Performance - iTunes MP3

3D Rendering Performance - 3dsmax 9

3D Rendering Performance - Cinebench 9.5

3D Rendering Performance - Lightwave 3D 09

3D Rendering Performance - Lightwave 3D 09

Gaming Performance - Oblivion

Gaming Performance - Half Life 2: Episode One

Gaming Performance - Prey

Gaming Performance - S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

Gaming Performance - Supreme Commander

Gaming Performance - Lost Planet Snow Benchmark DX9

Gaming Performance - Lost Planet Cave Benchmark DX9

Overclocking Final Words
Comments Locked

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • Sunrise089 - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    agree w/ 1+2
  • vailr - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    How long will the socket 775 (for desktop machines) be around?
    Has Intel given a timeline forecast for replacing 775 with some other CPU socket? Any idea whether current P35 boards will support the 32 nm. Gesher CPU (assuming those will still be socket 775 form factor)?
  • zsdersw - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    Socket 775 will likely disappear with the introduction of Nehalem, so no.. P35 boards will almost certainly *not* support Gesher.
  • RamarC - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    it's too bad that an upgrade now probably won't be able to handle anything beyond penryn. still a 3ghz quad core for $300 is fantastic considering that i've got 3.4ghz dual core space heater now.
  • zsdersw - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    Well, I mean, seriously.. socket 775 has been around for a long time. The same people who complain about having to buy a different motherboard are probably the same people who would complain that they aren't getting any new features if motherboards didn't have to be changed as often. It makes no sense, but then again, that's never stopped anyone from complaining.. to be sure.

    I'm not saying you're one of those people, though.
  • vailr - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    Also, the TigerDirect.com price you have listed of $569.99 for the "Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor" is off.
    It's at $289.99 here:
    http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/searchtool...">http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications...chtools/...
  • kleinwl - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    Why did you not post the benches for the OC of 3.22? or better yet, jack up the voltage to get a 3.33 and benchmark that? Then we could figure what the EXTREME EDITION cpu is going to do.
  • Roy2001 - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    I guess Intel does not allow him to do that.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, August 22, 2007 - link

    Thats a good point. To release benchies at this time must have intel's OK to do so. I am sure if they let him, he would have published. And here we are all complaining LOL .
  • gigahertz20 - Tuesday, August 21, 2007 - link

    What a tease, Anand didn't even raise the CPU core voltage. I figured you would change the CPU core voltage to see how far you could overclock this beast, right after you found 3.22GHz was your max overclock at stock voltage. I want to know how far you can push this. No soup for you!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now