Quick Thoughts

Looking at our first overclocking test results from the Biostar TF560 A2+, it is clear that NVIDIA's new nF560 chipset is a worthy contender in the mainstream AM2 market. We expect continued performance enhancements from the NVIDIA 7050 and AMD 690G boards through future BIOS updates and new driver releases and will display those new capabilities shortly. For now, the nF560 is the performance leader in the $80 AM2 market.

We firmly believe the nF560 chipset on this particular Biostar board will more than satisfy the overclocking appetites of most AMD users. While it doesn't offer the absolute performance or features of the more expensive nF590/570 SLI products, the Biostar TF560 A2+ does provide fairly impressive overclocking capabilities for under $80. In fact, its ability to maintain a stable HTT setting of 350 puts it in the same overclocking company as the majority of those nF590/570 SLI boards. The BIOS tuning options do not match those of an ASUS CrossHair as an example, but the majority of options needed to properly tune the chipset and memory are available.


As far as the new performance oriented 0801 BIOS goes, there are not any additional settings when compared to the 0612 BIOS utilized in our preview article. In fact, in early testing we have not found any substantial performance improvements but we have been able to run lower voltages at the same settings and have finally broke the 355 HTT barrier.

Truly, what we found to be most impressive at this time is the ability of our $65 X2 65W 3800+ or $84 X2 45W BE2300 to easily reach 3.0GHz. While it's not always as fast as the top of the line X2 6000+ due to its only having half the L2 cache (and some other minor differences), our two budget AM2 processors certainly come close enough that we would not hesitate to spend our money on buying either CPU and this board if you're willing to overclock. That might allow the use of the extra funds for the purchase of a top tier graphics card.

As for the competition between the budget AMD and Intel processors, it's amazing how evenly matched they are. Top clocks are similar, performance is similar, and only cost is really different. If you want maximum performance, one of the better Core 2 chips will invariably win out, but for good performance on the cheap AM2 still has some life left in it.

Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • DrMrLordX - Thursday, August 2, 2007 - link

    AM2+ K10 chips will "plop right in"to AM2 boards with the proper BIOS support, so I would assume they would work in this board too, regardless of whether it supports HT3, separates power planes, etc. Of course, that's all up to the board manufacturer and their BIOS support for K10.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now