iPEAK Business Application Tests

Our iPEAK Winstone benchmarks offer a glimpse into how well our hard disk drives will handle general office applications, media encoding, and graphics manipulation. While the business applications that are being tested tend to be more CPU bound, the performance of the hard drive can and will make a difference in the more disk intensive video and graphics applications where large media files are typically being edited.

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

The WD Raptor drives finish at the top in our business application tests as their 10k rpm spindle speed and optimized cache play an important role in their ability to sustain high transfer rates, especially in the Content Creation benchmark where transfer block sizes are significantly larger and more random than in the Business application benchmark. The Samsung 500GB drive is about 7% slower in the Business Winstone and 4% in the Content Creation Winstone than the Hitachi drive but once again places ahead of the Seagate drive.

iPEAK General Task Tests

The iPEAK based General Task benchmarks are designed to replicate utility based tasks that typically are disk intensive and represent common programs utilized on the majority of personal computers. While the WinRAR program is very CPU intensive it will typically stress the storage system in short bursts. Our antivirus benchmark will stress the storage system with continual reads and sporadic write requests while the defragmentation process is split between continual read and write requests.

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

IPEAK - Pure Hard Disk Performance

The Samsung drive performs consistently across these four general task benchmarks. While not the fastest 500GB drive in any of the tests, the drive never finishes last. In fact, the SpinPoint's performance is never more than 6% off the pace of the other 500GB drives with an average finish within 2% of the top drive in this storage capacity. Not bad for a drive that costs less than its competitors.

PCMark05 Performance iPEAK Video/Audio and Gaming Tests
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • Final Hamlet - Thursday, July 12, 2007 - link

    Why bother buying the out-dated T166 model if the F1 is entering the market as we're speaking?

    Just judging after the 1Tera Hitachi it will be more silent, less warm and the 500GB model has only 2 platters instead of 3.

    [I don't want to speak badly of Samsung HDs, as I have a T166 and a T133, but why bother buying the old generation?]
  • TA152H - Monday, July 9, 2007 - link

    You've got guts buying a Crashtor, and if it actually a Seagate, count yourself lucky. But, you probably have a Crashtor or some mixture. Seagate has properly relegated it to the low end segment, but they also said when they bought them that Maxtor had better perpendicular recording technology. I don't know what that means exactly, but your hard disk might truly be befouled by Maxtor genetics. Back up early and often. Hmmm, maybe that should have been Crashtor's moto. It's catchy.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now