Noise

For many enthusiasts upgrading cooling the goal is maximum stable overclock, and they will live with the inconvenience of a louder system. For other users silence is the most important factor, and these users will forgo maximum overclocking if that increases system noise levels.

There are very few power supplies that do not have a fan. While Zalman and a few others do make expensive fanless power supplies, we have not seen a fanless unit larger than 500W, or one that would be used for seriously overclocking a system. With that in mind the noise level of the system with all fans turned off except the PSU was measured. The power supply used for the cooling test bed is the OCZ PowerStream 520, which is one of the quieter of the high performance power supplies.

We have also measured the Corsair 620W and Mushkin 650W power supplies which are reported to be quieter than the OCZ. Both the Corsair and Mushkin are indeed quieter at idle or start up speed. However as soon as load testing begins and the PSU fan speed kicks up the measured noise level is almost exactly the same as the OCZ PowerStream 520W.

We are currently in the process of reevaluating our cooler test bed and planning some updates. The new configuration will include a "quieter" power supply with variable speed and noise levels. We will also update to a P35 chipset motherboard with all passive cooling to the chipset. Changes to the test bed will appear as part of a future roundup with the motherboard, PSU, and CPU all upgraded to more current configurations. We are also investigating a change to a quad-core processor as a further challenge to CPU cooling.

The noise level of the power supply was 38.3 dB from 24" (61cm) and 47 dB from 6" (152mm). The measured noise level of the test room is 36.4 dB, which would be considered a relatively quiet room with a noise floor slightly below the OCZ PowerStream 520 PSU.

Noise levels were measured with the 3RSystem iCEAGE fan at both low 1000rpm and high 2200rpm speeds. Both low and high measurements were taken at both the 6" and 24" distances above the cooling fan on an open case side. Results were then compared to the other coolers/fans tested in this category. Measured noise levels in this chart should be considered worst case. Measurements were taken with an open side of a mid tower case 6" and 24" from the HSF. Real world would be a completely closed case with a further reduction in noise. Please look for both low and high speed results in the noise graphs.

Noise Level - 6

Noise Level - 24

The measured noise levels at 6" and 24" are all below the system noise floor at the low 1000rpm speeds. However noise goes up appreciably as the fan speed is increased to 2200rpm - at both distances. The iCEAGE actually specifies a 19dbA to 32dbA noise range for the included fan, but we do not know the test conditions used for measuring noise. Our noise measurements are higher, but our measurement procedure is more demanding than many noise measurement tests. This is another way of saying the specified noise results may be accurate if we had used the same measurement procedures used by 3RSystem.

The iCEAGE fan is definitely audible at high speed, but the noise is not particularly irritating in frequency. The noise audibly disappeared in a fully closed case, but it still will bother those very sensitive to system noise. If you are very sensitive to noise you should definitely run the iCEAGE in a closed case, and reduce the fan to a level about 25% or more down from the maximum speed.

Overclocking Conclusion
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • strikeback03 - Friday, June 22, 2007 - link

    I often get an error if it has taken me a while to type a response. My solution is to copy the post, then try and post. If/when it throws the error, close the comments page and reopen, has always let me post after that.

    I had assumed serrated meant that the fins were bent up and down in plane, allowing more surface area for the overall width. Looking back at the pictures that appears to not be the case though. Maybe the cuts on the fins are to quiet down some noise caused by tip vortices or something.
  • Wesley Fink - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    On p. 3 CPU Test Configuration - we state "Room temperature is measured before beginning the cooler tests and is maintained in the 20 to 22C (68 to 72F) range for all testing." According to my test notes ambinet temp was just below 71F at the start of these tests. The lab is air conditioned, but we do have to set the system off to keep fans off during the few munutes it takes for noise measuremtns.


  • brian_riendeau - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    Cliff notes:

    -$50
    -Another decent tower cooler
    -Nothing special or mind blowing

    +8 pages of "content" to explain the 3 lines above

    I am continually amazed at the length and number of cooler articles that keep coming out of AT. With 8 pages, you could easily cover the relevant information on 8 seperate coolers, with pics and performance numbers for each cooler.
  • brian_riendeau - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    Also from earlier...

    "With the vast number of heatsink tests done to date it's surprising the ACF7Pro has yet to be tested."

    Not really. People would lose interest in this type of article if they all ended with something like "Too bad the ACF7Pro works as well (or better!) at less than half the cost". The coolers that keep getting tested have very high mark ups.
  • strikeback03 - Friday, June 22, 2007 - link

    quote:

    "Too bad the ACF7Pro works as well (or better!) at less than half the cost"


    umm, right...

    And despite how much of the article is cut-and-paste from previous reviews, it's amazing how many people will complain about aspects of the testing that have been mentioned each time.

  • strikeback03 - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    2nd page under Specifications - the box says Thermaltake MaxOrb Specifications.

    4th page right under the Idle graph - says the VX managed 29C.
  • yacoub - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    "The iCEAGE 120 should retail for around 45 to 50 USD"
  • yacoub - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    I didn't see a $xx anywhere in the article.
  • yacoub - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    Curious how much an improvement this offers over the AC Freezer 7 Pro, which a lot of overclockers run because it's cheap, easy to install, and performs decently well.

    If it's a significant enough improvemnt to warrant the purchase, that would be important to know. With the vast number of heatsink tests done to date it's surprising the ACF7Pro has yet to be tested.
  • Duraz0rz - Thursday, June 21, 2007 - link

    I want to see this cooler tested as well...I've had their A64 version for a while, and I loved it. I want to know how well the Freezer 7 Pro does with the Core 2 Duo, as I'm running the stock cooler right now, and the Freezer 7 Pro is freely avaliable and cheaper than the Scythe Mine Rev B I wanted to buy.

    Love how you guys are doing your cooler reviews here...keep it up! :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now