ECS PX1 Extreme: Board Layout and Features

Click to enlarge

ECS has come a long way in their layout and color combinations. The layout of this board is really good and for once we do not have a rainbow of colors that detracts the eye, although there is still plenty of marketing information on the board to let you know what options are important to ECS. The color combination could stand to be a little more coordinated but overall ECS is improving with each release. The board was simple to install into our case and all connections were easily reached. The board features a four-phase voltage regulator system that provided excellent stability throughout our testing along with ECS's first true heatpipe system. The board looks like it is performance oriented and fooled us into thinking so until we met the BIOS. The board also includes four fan headers and a nice Smart Fan control system.


The DIMM module slots' color coordination is correct for dual-channel setup based upon the premise of installing DIMMs in the same colored slots for dual-channel operation. The memory modules are slightly difficult to install with a full size video card placed in the PCI Express x16 slot. The 24-pin ATX power connector is located behind the DIMM slots.


The six Intel ICH8R SATA ports are color coded orange, while the JMicron JMB363 SATA port is red and located next to the green IDE connector. We found the positioning of the SATA ports to be excellent when utilizing any of the PCI slots although we still prefer the floppy drive connector to be near the memory slots to facilitate better cable management.

The ICH8DH is passively cooled with a low-rise heatsink connected to the heatpipe system and remained fairly cool to the touch throughout testing. The chassis panel is located to the left of the battery. The clear CMOS jumper is located above the battery. This is a three pin configuration and is partially blocked if a dual slot graphics card is installed in the first PCI Express x16 slot.


The board comes with two physical PCI Express x16 connectors (x16 and x4 electrical), two PCI Express x1 connectors, and three PCI 2.3 connectors. The layout of this design offers a very good balance of expansion slots for a mainstream board while providing very good clearance space for graphics card utilization. The first PCI Express x1 and PCI slots will be blocked by a dual slot graphics card but considering the dearth of PCI Express peripherals this is fully acceptable while leaving two PCI slots open if you run a CrossFire combination.

Click to enlarge

Returning to the CPU socket area, we find an ample amount of room for the majority of cooling solutions. We utilized the stock heatsink/fan in our base testing but also verified most of the larger Socket 775 cooling solutions would fit in this area during our overclocking tests. The 8-pin ATX power connector is placed on the far left side of the CPU area and did not interfere with our various cooling units although we once again recommend installing the power cable before any large HSF is utilized. The 4-pin Molex connector is required for dual graphics card installations.

The Intel P965 MCH chipset and PVM components are passively cooled with mid-rise heatsink units that did not interfere with any installed peripherals. Unfortunately, this nicely arranged heatpipe system goes to waste considering the limited overclocking capabilities, but as the board is intended for use in a media center configuration we will say it assists in cooling and keeping the system quiet.


The rear panel contains the standard PS/2 mouse and keyboard ports along with a serial port for those who still require certain legacy peripherals. The panel also includes two LAN ports, four USB ports, and an e-SATA port. The LAN (RJ-45) ports have two LED indicators representing Activity and Speed of the connection through the Intel and Realtek Gigabit controllers. The audio panel consists of six ports that can be configured for 2, 4, 6, and 8-channel audio connections for the Realtek ALC 885 HD codec. The only items missing from our wish list would be a Firewire port and S/PDIF audio connections - both of which can be pretty important for any system destined for HTPC use.

ECS PX1 Extreme: Feature Set ECS PX1 Extreme: Overclocking and Memory
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • mostlyprudent - Wednesday, December 6, 2006 - link

    I had been looking forward to the review of the MSI board. I can understand some OC limitation at the price, but then don't call it a "Platinum" board. I really don't do very much OCing, but always view the ability to reach high overclocks as a sign of a more well engineered board.

    Anyway, thanks for the review.
  • Beachspree - Monday, December 11, 2006 - link

    I was wondering why the Firewire performance is so poor in these reviews:

    Firewire 400 gets a best throughput of 230.6Mb/s

    It is known that Macs have poor USB 2 performance but look at the Firewire results by Barefeats:

    http://www.barefeats.com/usb2.html">http://www.barefeats.com/usb2.html
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard70.html">http://www.barefeats.com/hard70.html

    Without the perfect conditions of a RAM disk and no cacheing they get real world performance of up to:

    Firewire 400: 304 Mb/s (31% faster)
    Firewire 800: 464 Mb/s (41% faster)

    For comparison, Macs are getting lousy USB 2 performance. Intel Macs have improved it but that takes it from around 136Mb/s to 168Mb/s. That's 75% slower.

    Given the importance of Firewire in critical multimedia applications and it's likely use for HD video camcorders does this poor performance not warrant a mention?
  • Beachspree - Monday, December 11, 2006 - link

    To be clearer:

    Can we please have some real world figures for USB 2.0, eSATA and Firewire 400/800 transfers?

    That should take the form of transfers of:

    a) Many small files
    b) One large file

    under default settings and off an internal 7200 HDD you standardize on. That's what most people actually do when the backup, so that's what we need to see in order to make informed choices. I suspect these data rates you keep publishing are ones we will actually never see.

    I suggest, also, that poor Firewire performance in Windows is more important than poor USB on Macs. They always have Firewire built in and tend to it on peripherals, while Windows users often make do with USB until they get into music or video editing when they then find the need for Firewire and hit this poor performance just when they start needing mission critical performance. I'm talking about dropped frames and music latency.

    Why is that ignored in all your motherboard reviews?

    Thanks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now