Features and Layout
Click to enlarge

EPoX designed a well laid out board with all major connections easily reached. The layout provides very good clearance for all cards and most components and was very easy to install in our mid-size ATX case. The board features a well-designed 4-phase voltage regulator power design that provided superb stability during general usage and light overclocking. EPoX installed a combination of solid state capacitors along with high quality Sanyo electrolyte capacitors.


The DIMM module slots' color coordination is correct for dual channel setup. The memory modules are easy to install with a full size video card placed in the primary PCI Express X16 slot.


The orange ICH7 SATA ports are conveniently near the board's edge and in front of the to the yellow IDE port connector. Unlike other recently reviewed boards the SATA ports are not color coded for primary and secondary operation if this is important to you. We found the positioning of the SATA ports to be excellent when utilizing the PCI slots or the single IDE port connector. The Intel ICH7 chipset is passively cooled with a low-rise heatsink.

The yellow IDE connector did not present any connection issues in our mid-size ATX test case. The location of this connector is very good for most cases and those users still utilizing IDE hard drives, though most will use it for an optical drive(s) instead. The chassis panel and system fan header are located on the left of the drive ports. The black floppy drive connector is located in an inconvenient position at the left edge of the board. The CP80P post port debug LED is to the right of the floppy drive connector and in front of the EPoX EG1 I/O controller chip. The two USB 2.0 headers are located on the left edge of the board next to the last PCI slot.


The board comes with two physical PCI Express X16 connectors, two PCI Express X1 connectors, and three PCI 2.3 compliant 32-bit connectors. The layout of this design offers an exceptional balance of expansion slots for a full size ATX board.

Click to enlarge

Returning to the CPU socket area, we find a limited amount of room for alternative cooling solutions. We utilized the stock Intel heatsink and heatsinks such as the Cooler Master X-Dream P775 that utilize the same footprint size as the retail unit without issue. However, we verified our Tuniq 120 Tower and Scythe Infinity would not fit properly in this area during our tests due to the close proximity of the 945P MCH heatsink. We doubt most users of this board would go to that extreme to cool the processor due to the limited overclocking capabilities of the board.

Our other fitment concern is the location of the 24-pin ATX power connector as the cabling tends to interfere with the CPU heatsink/fan during usage. EPoX places the four-pin ATX power connector next to the 24-pin ATC connector. The cabling to this connector proved difficult to install if the main power cable was already attached.


The PS/2 mouse and keyboard ports are located to the left of the LPT parallel port, 9-pin serial port, and S/PDIF Coaxial port. The first two USB 2.0 ports are located next and are followed by the LAN (RJ-45) port and the second pair of USB 2.0 connectors. The audio panel consists of 3 ports that can be configured for 2, 4, and 6-channel audio connections.

Basic Features Overclocking and Memory Testing
Comments Locked

23 Comments

View All Comments

  • yacoub - Monday, September 11, 2006 - link

    I find it... I dunno... strange that you break out a zero-anchor graph for the gaming tests when normally in reviews you guys use a tighter graph that does not start at zero and thus makes the difference between performance seem great.

    I guess what I find funny is that if you used that type of graph in all of your reviews, many parts reviewed would show their true improvement which is often very very little. This reviews shows how this board barely performs any worse than the other boards charted, yet if you'd used the older method of a graph starting at, say, '60' instead of '0' people would think OMG there's a HUGE difference.

    Maybe what I'm trying to say is thanks for finally using a zero-anchored graph to show true performance delta instead of a zoomed in graph where the same charts would appear to have wide difference between part performance when they really don't.
  • yacoub - Monday, September 11, 2006 - link

    Here's what I'm talking about in comparison if anyone is wondering:
    http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2826&am...">http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=2826&am...
  • Gary Key - Monday, September 11, 2006 - link

    Hi,

    We do listen (sometimes the message takes a while to sink in) and decided to do away with the non-zero based graph or even a zoom in in this case. Although we clearly stated our purpose with the non-zero based graphs and provided one (if clicked) it appeared from comments this offering was not satisfactory either. Hopefully, we will have an updated graphing engine in the near future so this type of information can be presented in a different fashion. Thanks for the comments!

    :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now