Final Words

Looking at the performance offered by a variety of GPUs in Oblivion makes one thing clear: this game is the most stressful title on the market right now. We've focused primarily on stock performance using commonly available settings, but if you're serious about getting the most out of Oblivion we highly recommend looking at some of the tweak guides to help balance performance with appearance. For now, those of you hoping to run Oblivion at 1920x1200 with all the detail settings at maximum will need to wait for future GPU generations. But how do the current generation of cards fare?

At the high end, there's no better solution than ATI's Radeon X1900 series. While NVIDIA can offer similar performance with the GeForce 7900 GTX, its minimum frame rates aren't anywhere near as high as what ATI can deliver, meaning that the X1900 series will give you a much better overall experience. Oblivion is quite possibly the first game we've ever benchmarked where having multiple GPUs is almost necessary to get good frame rates at relatively common resolutions with most of the impressive visual effects turned on. The performance offered by a pair of X1900 XTs simply can't be matched by any single card, but as good of a game as Oblivion is you'd have to have a pretty serious computer budget to accommodate the $1200 that a pair of X1900 CrossFire GPUs will set you back.

Looking at mid range offerings, our recommendation sticks with ATI as the Radeon X1800 XT continues ATI's trend of offering absolutely stellar performance (relatively speaking) under Oblivion. At $200, the GeForce 7600 GT also proved to be a fairly strong contender in our medium quality tests.

In terms of upgrades, if you've got a CrossFire or SLI motherboard, adding a second GPU can improve performance by 25-50% in our Oblivion Gate test. X1600 CrossFire is probably the cheapest upgrade offering reasonable, assuming you already own an Radeon X1600 XT. At around $150 you really can't go wrong there. Moving from a single 6800 GS or 7600 GT to SLI also provides nearly 50% more performance, but the cost will be a bit higher.

If you own a slightly older card like something in the Radeon X800/X850 series, you honestly don't really need an upgrade to get better performance under Oblivion. Moving to a Shader Model 3.0 card like something in ATI's Radeon X1800 or X1900 series will give you HDR support and you'll be able to turn up some more eye candy, but then you're talking about a fairly significant upgrade investment. Moving to an X1800 XT will set you back more than $300 and still not offer you tremendous performance at higher image quality settings; for that you'll have to turn to a X1900 XT or XTX. Owners of the GeForce 6 series are in a similar situation: lowering your expectations a bit may be better than spending a lot of money on an upgrade.

This is just the tip of the iceberg however; we have a general idea of what GPUs do the best and worst in Oblivion but what about CPUs? And at what point does it stop making sense to spend money on new graphics cards versus just going out and buying the Xbox 360 version instead? We'll be answering those questions and more as our Oblivion coverage continues...

Mid Range GPU Performance w/ Bloom Enabled
Comments Locked

100 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrCoyote - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    What good does it do to benchmark this game? The engine they licensed for this game is very limited in performance and unoptimized <b>(GameByro)</b>. Please wait until a patch comes out, then benchmark the game. This performance limit can be seen in various reviews across the web. A 7900GT or X1900XT should be getting more than 20-30FPS on this game.
  • munky - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    People are not gonna wait for a patch to buy the game, and the whole premise of improved performance with a patch is uncertain. This review is useful for those who have the game, and would like to know if a certain upgrade would give them a significant improvement, or would just like to see how their performance compares to those with other video cards.
  • Jackyl - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    That's very true that the game is very much in an "unfinished" stage and was released too soon. Any professional developer knows that the Gamebyro engine has it's share of performance problems. It is not in the same league of engines as others. Why they licensed this engine is beyond me.

    Warning...Don't post anything even remotely negative about the game on the official forums. Fanboys will be waiting to lash back at you. Yet people are complaining left and right on the forums of the performance problems, bugs, and interface problems. The PC game looks nothing but just a console port. Bad inventory screen system and GUI. Hopefully a 3rd party modder can change these things.
  • poohbear - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    the bad inventory has already been resolved w/ a user mod. look for the Btmod-2.20
  • nts - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    The X1800XT can be had for less than the 7900GT and performs better...

    Why was it not include it in the Mid Range graphs?
  • SiliconDoc - Friday, July 17, 2009 - link

    Wow, how quickly the complaining masses forget. $1,200.00 for two ati cards - LOL
    And here I've been told by all the disgruntled red fans that nvidia is the greedy scalping horror....
    BWHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    ---
    It's so nice that anandtech doesn't delete their old reviews.
    TWELVE HUNDRED BUCKAROOS FOR 2 ATI CARDS.
    --
    Once again I find out the red fans have been deceiving me all along.
    This is great - another myth of the web, exploded thanks to the web.
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    So very true
    http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...">http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...
    http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...">http://www.alternate.de/html/productDetails.html?a...

    For the money, the x1800xt 512mb seems a better deal.
  • bob661 - Thursday, April 27, 2006 - link

    Just checked on Newegg and the prices are the same unless you go with the 256MB version of the X1800XT.
  • bob661 - Thursday, April 27, 2006 - link

    On Zipzoomfly, the 7900GT is a bit cheaper.
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - link

    We inadvertently left it out of the midrange tests; I just updated the graphs and conclusion to reflect its inclusion.

    Take care,
    Anand

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now