Gaming Performance

The one area where AMD has been the clear leader for years has been in gaming performance - Conroe changes everything.

Updated: In Don MacDonald's keynote he also provided us with another reference point for Conroe's performance, this time under Call of Duty 2. We have no idea what settings they ran at but the results we saw were Conroe at 111 fps and a Pentium Extreme Edition 3.73GHz scoring 90 fps. But the most interesting gaming tests are below:

First off we've got Quake 4 running the 1.0.5.0 patch at 1280 x 1024 with High Quality settings. The only demo available was Intel's own demo but nothing looked out of the ordinary with the recording. We tested with both r_useSMP enabled and disabled, first the SMP disabled numbers. Updated: The Quake 4 scores have been updated as mentioned in our follow-up article.

Quake 4 - r_useSMP=0

With SMP disabled, Conroe holds a 25% performance advantage over the 2.8GHz Athlon 64 X2. Enabling SMP provides a similar 24% performance advantage.

Quake 4 - r_useSMP=1

Next up is a Half Life 2 Lost Coast demo, once more an Intel supplied demo but there's only so much you can do to a demo recording to make it favor one CPU maker over another:

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast

Conroe's performance advantage extends to 31% under Half Life 2, talk about a complete role reversal here.

Unreal Tournament 2004

We finish off this page with Unreal Tournament 2004 and a 20% performance advantage for Conroe.

Index F.E.A.R. Performance
Comments Locked

220 Comments

View All Comments

  • Questar - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    I never said I didn't trust Anand's reviews.

    YOU said that Intel's have not been verified. I pointed out that neither have Anands.
  • StriderGT - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Wake up call from HW land:
    Intel produces intel procs...
  • Questar - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Oh, and by the way, a little google search will show you that the A64 benchmarks are right on.
  • StriderGT - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    I hope u did not look at intel's or apple's sites...
  • JackPack - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Why would there even be a mention of A64 on those sites?
  • flyingpan - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    I think the additional 32bit alu reserved for 64bit operation of Conroe is used for 32bit power-up, but what results about 64bit?
  • flyingpan - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    I want to see 64bit benchmarks on upcoming MS Windows Vista(64bit)
  • flyingpan - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    And 32bit benchmarks on Vista too....it would be close
  • JackPack - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    Let go, the straws you're hanging on to are about to break.
  • rayo123 - Tuesday, March 7, 2006 - link

    I didn't see anything about fp specs. I don't care about games. My main processor hungry apps use a lot of floating point. I'm sure the new design will help, the question is how much. If it's 10% vs 40% for fp, it's not much use to me, except may be in the overclocking potential.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now