Hard Disk Performance: PCMark 2005

We introduce PCMark 2005 into our hard disk benchmark suite. We utilize HDD test suite within the program. The program utilizes the RankDisk application within the Intel iPEAK SPT suite of tools to record a trace of disk activity during usage of real world applications. These traces can then be replayed to generate performance measurements based upon the actual disk operations within the application. The HDD test suite contains 53% read and 47% write operations with each trace section utilizing varied amounts of read or write operations. Additional information about the test suite can be found in PDF format here.

Our test results are based upon the following trace runs:

Windows XP Startup: This test consists of 90% reading and 10% writes that tracks XP activities at start-up.

Application Loading: This test consists of 83% reading and 17% writes that tracks the opening and closing of the following programs.
  • Microsoft Word
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader
  • Windows Media Player
  • 3Dmark 2001SE
  • Leadtek Winfast DVD
  • Mozilla Internet Browser
General Hard Disk Drive Usage: This test consists of 60% reading and 40% writes that tracks application usage utilizing the following settings.
  • Opening a Microsoft Word document, performing grammar check, saving and closing
  • Compression and decompression using Winzip
  • Encrypting and decrypting a file using PowerCrypt
  • Scanning files for viruses using F-Secure Antivirus
  • Playing an MP3 file with Winamp
  • Playing a WAV file with Winamp
  • Playing a DivX video using DivX codec and Windows Media Player
  • Playing a WMV video file using Windows Media Player
  • Viewing pictures using Windows Picture Viewer
  • Browsing the Internet using Microsoft Internet Explorer
  • Loading, playing and exiting a game with Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon
Virus Scanning: This test consists of 99.5% read operations as the test tracks the scanning activities of 600MB of files for viruses.

File Write: This test consists of 100% write activities by writing 680MB of files onto the hard disk.

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

Hard Drive Performance - PCMark 2005

The WD1500 leads the WD740GD by 11% in the total suite score and the Samsung SP2504C by 40%. While the Samsung drive posts very good write numbers, it is unable to match the read performance of the Raptors; but, once again, leads the Maxtor drive. The effect of enabling NCQ on the WD1500 results in a 2% drop in the overall score and 9% in the read intensive Virus Scanning benchmark.

Hard Disk Performance: Everest 2.50 / HD Tach Hard Disk Performance: Single Application Tests
Comments Locked

51 Comments

View All Comments

  • retrospooty - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    How do you enable/disable NCQ? I can't find anything on that.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    quote:

    How do you enable/disable NCQ? I can't find anything on that.


    This is accomplished through the NVIDIA SW-IDE driver settings. I will post a how to this evening.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Thanks, I found it, based on your clue above... I was looking at the drive props, not the IDE controller props... Duh.

  • Live - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Thanks, I found it, based on your clue above... I was looking at the drive props, not the IDE controller props... Duh.


    Care to enlighten the rest of us?
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Go to your system props>device manager>SATA controller, and uncheck the option.

    I have the latest Nforce 4 drivers loaded, so I cant say its exactly the same for earlier versions, or Intel/other chipsets, but that would be the logical place to look.
  • Live - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    I am wondering the same thing. Since it seems NCQ is not worth it for desktop use how do you disable it?
  • mlittl3 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    This review goes into way too much depth about NCQ vs. no NCQ. I can't remember if they say how to disable it. It is also a great review comparing SCSI vs. Raptor and SATA vs. Raptor performance. It is the most indepth review to date of all raptor drives except it leaves out Raid tests.

    http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200601/WD150...">http://www.storagereview.com/articles/200601/WD150...
  • mlittl3 - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    Whoops, I meant to imply that the Storagereview.com review goes into way too much detail about NCQ, not the Anandtech review. :)
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Whoops, I meant to imply that the Storagereview.com review goes into way too much detail about NCQ, not the Anandtech review. :)


    I understood that from your original statement. We wanted to go into more detail but the new game and multi-tasking benchmarks were not ready yet. Hopefully, we can provide more details in the near future.
  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 8, 2006 - link


    quote:

    This review goes into way too much depth about NCQ vs. no NCQ. I can't remember if they say how to disable it. It is also a great review comparing SCSI vs. Raptor and SATA vs. Raptor performance. It is the most indepth review to date of all raptor drives except it leaves out Raid tests.


    Eugene Ra provides excellent information and analysis. :-) We are expanding our test suites at this time and will be providing a more in-depth analysis of drives in the near future. Also, we will be expanding our RAID coverage depending upon the drive being tested (will it make a difference). There is certainly a need to do RAID analysis but it should include more than RAID 0 which only provides benefits in certain benchmarks. ;->

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now