Day of Defeat Performance

Day of Defeat uses Valve's new HDR technology on the Halflife 2 engine, which makes this game a good performance benchmark. One of the most interesting things to note here is how much of a performance hit NVIDIA takes when maximum quality settings are enabled in the control panel. Specifically, the 7800 GTX 512 gets roughly half the framerate with the max settings enabled as without.

With this game, we've omitted tests without AA enabled because there tends to be a CPU limitation on higher-end cards. Notice that while ATI gets only slightly better scores with AA enabled than NVIDIA, when maximum quality is enabled in the driver, the gap widens considerably and ATI does a much better job across resolutions. ATI gets playable framerates at the highest resolutions with the maximum quality enabled, but without an sli setup, NVIDIA can't really manage similar settings (18.9 fps at 2048x1536 with max quality and 22 fps at 1920x1440 with max quality).

Day of Defeat - 4X AA

Day of Defeat - Maximum Quality



Black and White 2 Performance Far Cry Performance
Comments Locked

120 Comments

View All Comments

  • Orbs - Wednesday, January 25, 2006 - link

    I didn't see any comparisons between X1900 XT CrossFire and X1900 XTX CrossFire, except for the comments at the end of the article saying diminishing returns resulting in even smaller a gap in CrossFire than the XTX had over the XT to begin with.

    With the exception of 1 B&W2 test (which I suspect is a typo), the graphs all show the X1800 XT vs. the X1900 XTX. Those are two different generations, not just clock speeds.
  • poohbear - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    I LOVE competition.:)
  • poohbear - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    especially GOOD competition.:0
  • Aquila76 - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Nice. Maybe we'll start seeing some real developments in GPU's again. Right now, it's more of a 'do what we've been doing but faster', maybe we'll start seeing some new innovations in video tech in the coming year (adding physics processing, wider encoding capabilities, etc.).
  • Spoelie - Thursday, January 26, 2006 - link

    The x.00 line was more of the same yeah, but the x1.00 line is architecturally a pretty large step forward, finally on par with nvidia where it really needed to and a few steps ahead in other areas. If only they gave it more ROPs/Texture engines.
  • Phantronius - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    And the shitty cycle of upgrading continues.
  • Capt Caveman - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    And available at a good price. Way to go ATI.
  • gimpsoft - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    nice scores on ATI but i still have my 6800GT ill wait until next 2 gen i see we can now play respectable 40 frames + @ 19200X1400 nice to know when 1080p tv are out

    don't know either that or get a PS3 will see =) it's getting way to expensive.
  • bamacre - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    WTF is your idea of "good price?" I see X1900 XT starting at $550 to $605 per card.
  • Capt Caveman - Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - link

    Digitally Unique has the X1900XT for $525 and Actbuy had them for $504. Based on performance, these cards offer a great bang for your buck. And this is coming from a GTX 512 owner.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now