Performance Tests

We ran several tests with the latest version of 3DMark to see what kind of results we would get across a range of NVIDIA and ATI cards. There are a number of different tests that 3DMark can perform to stress different aspects of the system, but the three tests that we will be focusing on here are Shader Model 2.0 graphics, HDR/Shader Model 3.0 graphics, and the overall score. Here is what we tested:

NVIDIA 6600 GT
NVIDIA 6800 GS
NVIDIA 7800 GT
NVIDIA 7800 GTX
NVIDIA 7800 GTX 512
ATI X800 GTO
ATI X1300 Pro
ATI X1600 XT
ATI X1800 XL
ATI X1800 XT

MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum/SLI motherboard
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 Processor
2x512MB OCZ 2-2-2-6 1T DDR400 RAM
Seagate 7200.7 120 GB Hard Drive
OCZ 600 W PowerStream Power Supply

The 3DMark06 benchmark is very straightforward. There are different settings that can be changed such as resolution and Anti-Aliasing, and clicking "Run 3DMark" will run the demos back-to-back and display the results when finished. For these tests, we chose the default resolution of 1280X1024 (no AA or AF).

3DMark06


3DMark06


3DMark06


(Note that in the HDR/SM3.0 graph, the X800 GTO is not included as it is incapable of rendering these effects.)

We can see by the graphs that 3DMark's graphics tests favor NVIDIA hardware over ATI, which is a further illustration of why 3DMark isn't really the best program for performance testing between cards. We know that different games tend to do better or worse on different hardware depending on the way the game was made, so a tool like 3DMark won't necessarily determine which card would be best suited for a specific game. This is an important fact for users in the market for a new card to realize before they spend their hard-earned money.

3DMark06 is a very stressful benchmark and as could be expected, some of the less powerful cards ran the demos very slowly. Because the graphics are so intensive, the effects were quite stunning, especially on the high end cards like the 7800 GTX (512) and the X1800 XT. During the firefly scenes, the warm glow of the fireflies in the night created intricate, hypnotic reflections of the foliage, and the brilliant white of the snow and sun in the arctic outpost demo at the end were striking. But at the end of our testing, we are mostly left with shallow beauty rather than a deep, meaningful connection. The overall 3DMark scores don't really give us much more information than we already have; other than simply letting us know what hardware runs 3DMark better.

3DMark06 Final Words
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zak - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    I find it handy for another purpose: to see if the performance of my computer has deteriorated over the time and to see if there are any problems I'm not aware of. So I run 3D Mark after freshly installing the system and I write down the score. Every now and then, or after software updates I run it again to see if everything is all right.

    <Z>
  • bigpow - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    Would be curious to know what's the score of Apple's new Quadcore G5
  • Powermoloch - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    What happen to the X850XT/PE or X800XT/PE ?

  • JamesDax - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    I wanna see some bences on a system usind an AGEIA PhysX card. Since this version of 3DMark supports that sdk it would be nice to see if there is any performance imporvement on systems using the card vs. same system not.
  • ViRGE - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    What good would a PPU do? In the standard 3dMark benchmark, there's no physics calculations going on.
  • Griswold - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    Let me run to that hardware shop at the corner and buy one to test it. Oh wait...
  • JamesDax - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    Very good observation A$$ for brains. What I was suggesting was that a hardware site, for instance Anandtech, could contact BFG or ASUS to get a card for testing. Both have said that the cards are ready and BFG even had a card at CES.
  • Griswold - Thursday, January 19, 2006 - link

    Fuck you too, buddy.
  • FrozenCanadian - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    In the last line of the article:

    "While we will certainly be not be reporting 3DMark scores "
  • JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 18, 2006 - link

    Fixed and tweaked. I will definitely be running 3DMark06 in the future, but more as a stress test than for performance comparisons, like in the overclocking articles I've done.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now