Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

Gaming Performance

With a 50MHz higher clock frequency than the 6100, we really expected the Asus A8N-VM to handily win all the Integrated Graphics benchmarks. That didn't happen. Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory and UT2004 behave as expected, with the A8N-VM at the top of the performance chart by a small, but significant margin. However, Doom 3 and Far Cry show the Biostar 6100 as the better performer. Either there is very little performance difference between the 6100 and 6150 chipsets, or the Biostar is a particularly effective design with a well-optimized BIOS.

General Performance, 3D Graphics & Encoding Audio and Ethernet Performance
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anton74 - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    It appears this type of board is mostly touted for HTPC use, but I think it's quite excellent for a capable office system as well because of the DVI connector, dual-head capability and gigabit LAN - and of course all the other connectivity goodness that's largely standard these days. And passive cooling, which I appreciate.

    I'm not aware of the existence of any other board with integrated graphics that has a DVI connector and can drive 2 monitors without additional expense. This is absolutely great for a very productive office setup without really breaking the bank (although using a cheaper Sempron CPU is out, since it's Socket 939).

    Of course, competing boards should follow based on this chipset, which is only going to be a good thing. (Are all GeForce 6150 boards expected to have DVI connectors?)

    By the way, are there some availability issues with this board? Newegg.com has had it listed out of stock for a good while now, periodically pushing back the ETA (which now isn't even mentioned anymore). Not many retailers seem to carry it yet, judging from the RTPE.
  • bob661 - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    quote:

    DVI connector and can drive 2 monitors
    The only issue with this is that you can't use one of those DVI to VGA converters on this board. There are several warnings on the website and in the manual not to do that.
  • Calin - Friday, December 2, 2005 - link

    There are many (cheaper, it's true) LCD panels that support VGA in, so this won't be such a big problem. Sad is that - if you want dual out, you need a panel with DVI input.
  • Anton74 - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    quote:

    The only issue with this is that you can't use one of those DVI to VGA converters on this board.

    Indeed, but for office applications - especially for those that care enough to invest in a dual head setup - LCD panels are generally more desirable I would think. I know it's what I want for my work system.
  • Degrador - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    The article has been removed?? Product Disclosure Statement?
  • ksherman - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    called an NDA (non-Disclosure Agreement) ;)
  • Degrador - Friday, December 2, 2005 - link

    lol, it is too, right term wasn't coming to mind :)
  • Anand Lal Shimpi - Thursday, December 1, 2005 - link

    The article got pushed back by a day to accommodate the Yonah exclusive yesterday. That's why it was temporarily removed.

    Take care,
    Anand
  • Degrador - Friday, December 2, 2005 - link

    Thanks for the reply Anand, it's nice to have a site where we can still get reasons for things :)
  • bob661 - Wednesday, November 30, 2005 - link

    It would have been nice if Asus included High Definition Audio on this board.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now