For a $600 notebook, the build quality on the Gateway NX200S is pretty impressive.  The screen hinges are sturdy as is the screen latching mechanism that keeps the notebook closed when not in use. 

The plastic construction of the NX200S is fairly solid. However, the unit was already starting to develop some squeaks during our testing.   

While the Inspiron 2200 offered the most simplistic and sleek design, and the Compaqs were a bit too busy for our tastes, the Gateway NX200S falls right in the middle.  It has the black/grey theme going on, but sticks to a single LED color and manages to pull off a somewhat sleek appearance, thanks to the shape and thickness of the notebook.

The Gateway is the thinnest notebook out of the bunch, measuring between 1.1 and 1.24" at its thickest point.  The unit is also comparable in size to the Compaq V2000 notebooks, making it amongst the most compact in this roundup.  But thanks to the thinner construction, the Gateway feels considerably smaller than the Compaqs. 


The Compaq V series (left) vs. the Gateway NX200S


The Compaq V series (left) vs. the Gateway NX200S

The NX200S features a 14" WXGA display with a native resolution of 1280 x 768.

The display looks identical to what Compaq used in their widescreen notebooks, with similar brightness and visual characteristics.  We wouldn't be too surprised if both notebooks used the same panel.   

Gateway NX200S Gateway Keyboard
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    x200 graphics with/o dedicated memory.

    If you get x300 graphics with some dedicated memory, it should play some of hte latest games at halfway acceptable settings. Just dont' expect to be playing FPS smoothly though, but RPGs/rts should be fine. Racing should be fine too.
  • manno - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    me
  • LoneWolf15 - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Interesting to note that even without Speedstep, the Celeron-M still has better battery life. Then again, didn't Intel change some designs in transistor-switching to make battery performance better even at full speed?

    One comment, more to notebook manufacturers: Where the heck is my Trackpoint mouse? I can't stand touchpads, which require me to take my fingers off the keyboard to use, when a trackpoint can be used almost simultaneously. I can type 75-80wpm, and don't find touchpads very efficient for this reason (my older but top-of-the-line-when-released Latitude C840 has both devices). Somebody, please bring back the Trackpoint!
  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Also, why do you have to take your fingers of the keyboard to use the touchpad? I keep one hand on the keyboard, and one hand on the touchpad when using my computer. Rightclick is tap top right corner, leftclick is tap anywhere on the touchpad that doesn't involve the top right corner.
  • Zorba - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I too hate touchpads and miss the old mouse sticks. I always rub the touchpad with my arm when typing and usually end up clicking some where I don't want to. It also takes me much longer to navigate with a touchpad and I usually accidently click something because I change the amount of pressure on the pad (I know you can turn the clicking off, but I still don't like the pad). It is a personal preference but I would like to at least be given the chance to pick between the two.
  • matthewfoley - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Yeah, well I hate the mouse sticks. Who cares.
  • Zorba - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    The point the original poster and I were trying to make is manufacturers should include both devices, which a lot of them used to do.
  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    The battery life difference is most likely due to the ATI chipset and integrated graphics, which uses more power than intel EE.
  • Tamale - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    page 9's link to page 10 is shot
  • Tamale - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    nvm :]

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now