The Test


 Test Configuration
Chipset Drivers Intel 915/855 - Intel INF Installation Utility 7.2.2.1006
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M - ATI Catalyst 5.10
Graphics Drivers Intel 915/855 - Intel Graphics Driver 14.17
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M - ATI Catalyst 5.10

For all tests, each machine was tested with a clean install of Windows and all drivers installed (the latest available as of the publication date), but none of the bundled applications were installed (with the exception of any battery/power management utilities). 

All performance tests were conducted with the Power Management settings set to Always On.

All benchmarks were conducted with the display set to the native resolution of the notebook's LCD panel.

Mobile Mark 2005 battery life tests were conducted with the Power Management settings set to Portable/Laptop, but with the screen set to never turn off and with the hard disk set to power down after 5 minutes.  All battery life tests were conducted with the displays set to 60 - 70 nits. 

Performance testing was done using Business and Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2004, as well as SYSMark 2004. 

Battery life testing was done using Mobile Mark 2005. 

Gateway Keyboard Business Performance
Comments Locked

50 Comments

View All Comments

  • johnsonx - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Inspiron 6000 (can be had for $600 on the right day)
    Acer Aspire 3003

    Rudimentary gaming benchmarks. Yes, most current games are almost unplayable on these, but some would probably play fine. I played Dungeon Siege LOA quite happily on my Inspiron 6000, and old Unreal Tournament works great (even UT2k4 is just barely playable at 640x480x16, though very ugly). It would also be nice to see how much better ATI integrated gfx are vs. Intel (and SiS Mirage 2 in the case of the Acer).
  • hondaman - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I agree that its long overdue for a laptop graphics gaming review. Using all the common graphics, integrated or not, like the mirage 2, x200m, 700m, 9700, and all the assorted nvidia ones.
  • johnsonx - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    "with the Dell doing absolutely dismally at only 144 minutes. The only tangible advantage we can see that Gateway has in this case is that they use an older chipset"...

    The tangible disadvantage for the Dell is that they use the old NiMH battery instead of Lithium ion. I have the original version of that laptop, the Inspiron 1000. It's battery life sucked even worse, plus it died after only 5 months.

    If you even remotely care about battery life, DON'T buy a dell with the NiMH battery. Don't buy a Dell without a 1-year warranty either.

  • ksherman - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Is there any hope for upgrades in these laptops? Like if I poped the hood off the COmpaq (Smepron of course) and threw in a Turion MT processor... or even a pentium M for the others, is that something doable?
  • Hacp - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I know for a fact that the compaqs are upgradable. you can upgrade the processor/ram/hd/optical drive.
  • bloc - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/compute...">http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopp...el=2&...

    IT's TFT XGA, not WXGA.
  • SilverTrine - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I'm amazed that Gateway tries to charge $50 shipping on a notebook. Anands assertion of $600 laptops is misleading, with shipping and tax this laptop is $800.
  • KCjeeper - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I purchased one of these Gateway laptops a few weeks ago and am very pleased with it. Mine came with the wireless G and I only paid $579.
  • bldckstark - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    I am curious as to which company(ies) denied access to test parts. It doesn't make a whole lot of difference, but I wonder who is so embarassed of their product that they don't want them compared openly.
  • bjacobson - Tuesday, November 29, 2005 - link

    Something worth noting is that the good battery life on the V2000 is thanks to the Intel 2200BG integrated wireless, not the Broadcom wireless. The Broadcom is what made the V2000z Sempron's do so poorly.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now