8-Phase Power and Dual x16 PCIe

Two areas really stand out with the new Asus A8N32-SLI. First, this is the launch of a true dual x16 SLI board. That means that you can bridge two video cards at full x16 speed in each slot instead of the x8 speed of current SLI.

8-Phase Power

The new Asus 32-SLI boards, both the recently tested P5N32-SLI for Intel processors and this A8N32-SLI for AMD, are the first 8-phase desktop boards that we have tested. Those who have questioned whether the design is truly 8-phase will be interested in this shot with the MOSFET heatsinks removed on the Intel version. There are 8 coils and 8 banks of MOSFETS along the two sides of the CPU.

Why 8-phase? Asus tells us that an 8-phase design significantly reduces the requirements for input ripple current.

Looking at hard numbers, this means that the ripple current in an 8-phase design is 3 to 4 times lower than a standard 3- or 4-phase design. Based on a 100 Amp output current, the required input ripple current would be:

 CPU Current 100A  2-Phase  3-Phase  4-Phase  8-Phase
Input Ripple Current (A) 22.63 16.508 12.359 4.463

Low ripple voltage can stabilize the CPU at working voltage, but it also can increase the over-clocking margin. An Asus White Paper uses the analogy of ripple voltage being like waves in an ocean and the CPU is like a boat. It is very hard for a boat to go forward in big waves (High ripple voltage), and the big waves can even turn the boat around (Burnout of the CPU). On the other hand, it is easy for a boat to move forward in small waves (Low ripple voltage), and the boat can even go faster (Overclocking the CPU) in an ocean with small waves.

The other advantages of 8-phase are a current reduction of up to 50% compared to 4-phase, which can yield a power reduction of about 25% over 4-phase. This even applies to a reduction in power consumption in a high-end CPU. Asus claims that a CPU requiring 130W in a 4-phase design will see a 10% reduction in power consumption in an 8-phase design.

All of these power reductions mean less heat, which is becoming an increasing problem as traces get smaller and systems get faster. How much heat reduction? Asus claims that their 8-phase design is 15°C (36°F) cooler than conventional solutions when the system is stressed in operations like high overclocking. Lower heat contributes to less need for cooling, higher overclocks, greater reliability, and the ability to use passive heat-pipe cooling without active fans.

Dual x16 PCIe

While both the P5N32-SLI for Intel and this A8N32-SLI for AMD provide two full speed 16-bit slots for SLI, they use a slightly different set of chipsets to drive this feature. This AMD version uses what is basically a C51 Northbridge chip without integrated graphics for the A8N32-SLI North Bridge and an nForce4 SLI chip for the South Bridge. In this hybrid design, each bridge drives one x16 slot and a total of 40 PCIe lanes are available to the board.

The Intel processor solution from NVIDIA uses the Intel C19 for the Northbridge and the same nForce4 SLI for the South Bridge. The 2 chips communicate via a Hypertransport link just like the chips in the AMD solution.

Whatever the differences in approach, both the Intel and AMD versions provide full dual x16 PCIe slots, which can be combined into Dual x16 SLI video. There are also other potential design uses as you saw in the Gigabyte quad PCIe review, where the board could enable four x8 PCIe slots to drive up to 10 monitors.

Index Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe: Board Layout
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Both the Asus and DFI were definitely running 1 x16 in single video card mode. The single video card results - using the same 81.85/6.82 drivers, video cards, CPU, and memory - were the most surprising results. I really don't have an explanation for the performance differences here, since there is very little performance difference in older titles but a large difference in the just released games. We are hoping nVidia can shed some light on these benchmark results.
  • n7 - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    This actually looks like a very good mobo.

    However, knowing Asus, i'm sure we will we won't find it reasonably priced anywhere.

    If it came down in price, & they offered a non-SLI version for those of us who don't want SLI, i'd get interested :)
  • aLeoN - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    What kind of rich enthusiast wouldn't want to spend top dollar for the top of the line equipment? Don't get me wrong, I'd like exactly what you do but they've only changed to 8 phase cooling and x16 sli over the current nf4 boards right? Imo it doesn't sound like a very profitable idea if you threw phase change cooling onto an A8N-E but I'll keep my fingers crossed for the both of us.
  • Zebo - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    hehe - the real trick is turning pyrite into gold..Tortise into hare... Anyone can empty thier wallet out or max thier credit card out, as the case may be, on top of the line eqiupment. Takes real skill to turn budget parts into them. IMO.
  • aLeoN - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Right on man! I have a friend who demands near top of the line and doesn't hesitate to have something better than our circle of friends. I'm planning a OC rig for just about a grand that would topple his $3000+ (invested in over a couple years) rig, forcing him to upgrade it with his $1500 now (he was saving it till something good came out or me and a couple other friends get something better). It's people like these that drive our economy! =D
  • gnumantsc - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Wes the chart for Far Cry on Single Video shows a percent increase of 0.4% with the numbers showing 74.3 vs. 47.5. Shouldn't it be 74.5?
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    The chart is correct, and I did a dyslexic in the table. The correct numbers are 47.3 nad 47.5. The table has been corrected.
  • Zebo - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Yes sir just gunna have to wait for another C51 review to see if it's nV's chipset or something ASUS is doing. Definity shocking to see large performance gaps like that so I'm sure you tested and retested and retested after that too.
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Sorry, I will fix the Typo. I made sure all jumpers were reset to single video mode on the DFI and double checked the readout in BIOS before runnign single video tests.
  • Phantronius - Friday, November 4, 2005 - link

    Damnit, I spent alot of money on my Asus A8N Premium board. Grrrrrrr...!! I want a 17% boost in single card performance!!!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now