Unreal Tournament 2004 Performance

Our UT2004 test is a Flyby of DM-Antalus, the same test that was used under UT2003. 

Flyby performance ends up giving a better look at pure GPU performance as it removes all of the physics and AI calculations that the CPU would normally be performing. So, while you get higher frame rates, you still end up finding out which cards are the fastest. 

We used Santaduck's UT2004 Benchmark Toolkit at its Maximum Quality Settings for all  tests.

Unreal Tournament 2004 Performance

UT2004 performance is more than acceptable across the board, even on the Radeon 9600 Pro Mac & PC Edition.  We're still seeing performance lower than the OEM 9600XT, but that is to be expected.


Doom 3 Performance Halo Performance
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • Cuser - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    I don't see the use for a video card that is cross-platform compatible, except in the corporate environment....yet it seems like this would be a good direction for future cards...which, now that I think of it, will be a moot point being that Mac is going x86...

    A side note though...
    Wow, there is a "gamer" base for the Macs? With framerates like 44 fps from their highest performing systems, I feel for them! Come on over the the x86 side, we'll take good care of you...
  • IceT - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    I also don't understand why ATi is launching such product @ this time...It seems (my opinion) that they are bringing us backward, unless you can provide me with some rationale.
  • sirfergy - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    The dual link functionality is why. Only other card for mac was the 6800 and that was very expensive.
  • Doormat - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    If someone can afford a 30" Cinema display to utilize the dual link capability, they can splurge on a 6800DDL over this card.
  • a2daj - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    Unless they have a G4 and want to use the 30" in it. Then the 6800 wouldn't be compatible. Only the new Mac Radoen 9600 Pro.
  • MrFantastic - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    "As a card, the Radeon 9600 Pro Mac & PC Edition is an excellent offering."

    LoL.

    It may as well NOT support PC's since no pc owner in their right mind should choose this '£200' oldie over something like a 9800pro/6600gt/800gt
  • a2daj - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    And how many of those "9800pro/6600gt/800gt" cards offer a dual-link DVI connector to run the 30" cinema display?
  • Scott66 - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    There are many mac users looking for an upgrade in video cards to take advantage of the new graphic abilities in the new Tiger OS software. (similar to what Vista is now announcing and will be included in subsequent beta versions). A 9600 card is just what the Mac doctor ordered. So I guess ATi is looking to provide a similar card for Window users who just want to get all the graphic features Vista can provide but not interested in gaming. If they keep the price low it will be a good seller
  • vijay333 - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    yes! I've always wanted to buy graphics cards 3-4 years after everyone else has had a chance to stress test them...

    funny thing is that I just upgraded from my 9600 Pro to a 6800GT :)
  • Questar - Friday, August 19, 2005 - link

    Wow, a review of a three year old GPU.
    My guess is that Anand had to give ATI a good suck in order to get 520 parts before launch.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now