SLI and Dual Video

Benchmarking and performance comparisons were covered in FIRST LOOK: ULi M1695 PCIe/AGP Socket 939 for Athlon 64. Please refer to the Part 1 of this review for test comparisons to other Athlon 64 Socket 939 chipsets.

The other big news with ULi Reference 2 is the ULi support for NVIDIA SLI with their chipset and the option for dual PCIe video. Does it work?

There is no doubt that dual PCIe video works as intended with the riser card. Mount two PCIe cards, install the driver, and dual video (or triple with the AGP, or quad with AGP and PCI) is certainly possible.

ULi supplied some custom drivers for SLI testing, since at this early stage they have not received SLI certification for their Reference boards. The special ULi drivers are based on NVIDIA driver build 71.24, so they are quite a bit older than the current 77.72.

After setting the board to two x8 in BIOS, installing the riser card and a matched pair of MSI 7800 GTX with an SLI bridge, we thought that we were ready to go.

As we started driver installation we were informed the hardware was not supported. As 71.24 is a pre-7800 driver we figured out the 7800 were not supported. We have asked ULi for an updated driver with 7800 support.


We then installed two NVIDIA 6800 Ultra video cards. To our surprise, the two double-width cards would install in the riser card. The riser looked tight, but the 6800 Ultra fit just fine.

The ULi-modifed 71.24 drivers installed fine with the 6800 Ultra video cards, SLI was recognized and properly enabled. However, as we began testing, we noticed 2D mode worked fine, but any Direct 3D applications - which is virtually all the games for SLI benchmarking - failed to initialize properly. ULi is working on the problem with Direct 3D support and will supply updated drivers as soon as it is ready.

It is clear from the enabling of SLI with the pre-production driver that SLI will work on the ULi M1695/M1567. ULi just has a bit more work to do on the special driver for ULi SLI.

Overclocking : ULi M1695/M1567 Reference 2 Overclocking Comparison
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • arfan - Friday, August 5, 2005 - link

    it very dissapointed, anandtech use M$
  • brownba - Friday, August 5, 2005 - link

    It is quite disappointing how children these days do not possess simple spelling and grammar skills.
  • mino - Saturday, August 6, 2005 - link

    Also the use of .NET by AT is understandable. What bothers me are the reasons for this.
    .NET is a really good platform to build on. And that IS dangerous.
    We don't want M$ to rule the Milky Way, do we ?
  • ryanv12 - Friday, August 5, 2005 - link

    This board is looking very good. I hope they come in at much lower prices as well.
  • neogodless - Friday, August 5, 2005 - link

    Very good to see competition like this, particularly as I slowly warm up to spending the money for a dual-core Athlon system... I should be able to keep a lot of my old components such as memory and AGP video card!
  • reactor - Friday, August 5, 2005 - link

    quite an amazing board, hope these become popular so the prices/availability get better. i am very interesting in getting one. 400 fsb is insane! good stuff anandtech as usual.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now