Storage Recommendations

There hasn't been a whole lot of change in the storage segment in terms of new products. Prices have dropped, but the recommendations overall remain about the same. Our recent Price Guide covered the storage market in more detail, and we'll refer interested readers there. The basic summary is that the HDD scene has not changed too much, and the DVDR scene has changed even less. The good news is that it means it's less difficult to pick a good product, which is especially true of DVDRs. The bad news is that I/O intensive tasks will still be waiting on the drives as much as ever.

A topic that also deserves mention in regards to hard drives is RAID (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks). RAID can allow for either increased transfer rates, improved reliability, or both. RAID 0 provides increased performance by reading and writing to multiple drives at the same time in a process called striping, effectively doubling the sustained transfer rate for two drives. The problem is that if any drive in a RAID 0 configuration fails, you lose all the data. That's definitely not something to take lightly. RAID 1 goes the other route and provides a 1 for 1 copy of everything written to the hard drives, a.k.a. mirroring. In the event of a drive failure, the faulty drive is deactivated and you run with one drive until a replacement can be found. The drawback is that you now pay twice as much per GB of available storage. RAID 1+0 (sometimes called RAID 10) combines both striping and mirroring, but it requires at least four drives for the standard setup and you still only get half the realizable storage. RAID 5 is the most common remaining option, requiring a minimum of three drives to function. Only one of the drives in the array becomes "lost" capacity, but you need a good (re: expensive) controller to get acceptable RAID 5 performance. We don't really feel that RAID is something most people need, and a good backup strategy - to CDs or DVDs, usually - is often just as important as redundancy. Still, the option is there for those who need it.


Click to enlarge.

Mid-Range HDD Recommendation
Hard Drive: Seagate 250GB 7200.8 SATA
Price: $128 Shipped

Picking a good hard drive for the Mid-Range market is relatively easy. You want a low cost per GB, and for the most part, the different brands all perform at close to the same level. Provided that you get a hard drive that has Fluid Dynamic Bearings (FDB), you shouldn't have to worry about any high pitched whine emanating from your computer. (This was a problem in the past, particularly with Western Digital and Maxtor drives.) Unless you're trying to build a truly silent PC, the amount of noise generated by the heads moving around will normally be drowned out by the noise of the GPU, CPU, and case fans - even the noisiest of drives is difficult to hear when confined within an ATX case. Just to make this clear, we mean that seek noise is difficult to hear, not bearing noise; we have numerous older drives that emit a high-pitched whine that can be heard a couple of rooms away.

Our recommendation goes to the Seagate model for several reasons. Besides being spacious and quiet, it provides NCQ support and a 5-year warranty, all at a price that's just as low as any of the competition. If you are for some reason opposed to 250GB hard drives, you can find everything from 80GB to 200GB at a lower price than the Seagate 250GB (depending on model and brand). The smaller drives end up coming with a higher cost per GB, however, to the point where anything less than 80GB isn't worth considering. $60 for an 80GB drive is still a reasonable deal, but you can double the capacity for only a 50% price increase. Other than Seagate, we like Samsung drives due to their even lower noise levels. Hitachi, Maxtor, and Western Digital are all decent as well, but we would suggest that you make sure you get FDB with the Maxtor and WD drives. SATA-2 drives are also starting to show up at retail, and while they may not offer a performance advantage, the price difference is negligible. Hitachi is the only manufacturer currently showing up in our Pricing Engine, although that will change with time.

Click images to enlarge.

High-End HDD Recommendations
Hard Drive: Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10,000RPM SATA
Price: $180 Shipped
Hard Drive: Maxtor DiamondMax 10 250GB 16MB SATA
Price: $160 Shipped
Hard Drive: Hitachi 7K250 400GB SATA
Price: $265 Shipped

There are three areas that we consider to be high end for hard drives. First is the option for a faster spindle speed, leading to faster transfer rates and access times. 10,000RPM SATA and SCSI drives are available, but the SATA drives are cheaper and don't require an additional SCSI controller. You can even go for a 15,000RPM SCSI drive, although the cost is twice as much (or more) as that of the 10,000RPM drives of the same capacity. The next item that makes a hard drive high end is additional cache, and at present, the only manufacturer to fill that niche is Maxtor, with both its SATA and PATA MaxLine III/DiamondMax 10 models including 16MB of cache rather than 8MB. The final item that can make a high end drive is increased capacity, with 300 to 400 GB drives now available. Increased capacity via higher data densities also improves the transfer rate of a drive, although it doesn't help the access times. Determining which of these features are the most important along with keeping price in check is difficult. Sure, you can get 146GB 15,000RPM SCSI drives to satisfy the need for performance and capacity, but at a cost of over $1000 per drive, they're not meant for mere mortals.

In the end, we can't really give one specific recommendation for a high end drive. If you need capacity above all else, the Hitachi 7K250 400GB will fit the bill. Seagate also offers a 400GB 7200.8 drive for about $25 more if you're interested. Striking a middle ground between performance and capacity is the Maxtor DiamondMax 10 line, of which we've selected the 250GB model. The 300GB model has a similar cost per GB, so if you want a bit more capacity, that's definitely an option. While we don't care too much for the old IDE interface, we should also note that the Maxtor drives are available in PATA format for quite a bit less. Finally, if you're only interested in having the highest possible sustained transfer rate and access times, the Western Digital Raptor 74GB gets our recommendation again. 15,000RPM SCSI drives would be even faster than the Raptor, but they start at around $400 for the Hitachi 15K73 and go up from there - twice as much as the Raptor, not counting the cost of SCSI controllers and cables.


Click to enlarge.

Optical Recommendation
DVD+R Drive: NEC 16X 3520A
Price: $48 Shipped

With 16X burn speeds for both DVD+R and DVD-R media and 8X/6X for the respective RW variants, the only thing really missing from the NEC 3520A is DVD-RAM support. If you need or want that, the LG GSA-4163B has 5X DVD-RAM support for just a few dollars more. Either drive will work well for most people, and while some will argue that Plextor or Sony drives are better, we haven't been able to back up such claims with any tests. Given the higher price - over twice as much in the case of the Plextor 16X - we cannot justify such a purchase. Pioneer's DVR-109 is another alternative, and Lite-On, Toshiba, and BenQ are also worth considering, assuming that the price is right. We feel that features and performance are all now close enough that we'd simply take the cheapest 16X DVDR Dual-Layer capable drive and be done with it, which is why the NEC and LG get our recommendation. As always, match the color of the drive with your case if that's important to you.

Floppy Recommendation
Floppy: Any
Price: $8 Shipped

When you're spending this much money on a nice, new system, it's almost a shame to have to put in old technology like a floppy drive. While not strictly required, we'd rather have the drive installed and never use it than to not have it and discover later that we need it. Anyone planning on using RAID will definitely want a floppy drive, as it's required for installing XP onto any RAID setup that we're aware of. Windows Longhorn should finally kill off the floppy requirement, but that's still more than a year off. $8 over 365 days amounts to just 2.2 cents per day - you can manage it, right? As with the DVDR drive, you will probably want to match the floppy to the case.

Graphics Case and Power Recommendations
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • Calin - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    Oh, and no micro ATX board is the flagship of any mainboard manufacturer. VIA is the only one that has a small mainboard as the flagship (the Mini ITX platform)
  • Calin - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    Hi Tujan
    I think I would like to see more Micro ATX mainboards too. But the idea is that micro ATX boards are not in the segment that typical reviewers like. They usually lack any kind of overclocking potential, their expansion possibilities are very restricted, and in some cases the performance is lacking compared to their big brothers (ATX). Also, they usually have 2 memory slots (unlike 3 to 4 of ATX), and the layout is much more cramped.
    Advantages? There could be a price advantage, size and maybe cooling.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    crimson117 - Hey, I gave plenty of options for more RAM. The fact is there are very few people that really need more than 1GB of RAM right now. If you need more than 1GB, I'd probably go for 2x1GB rather than 4x512MB, as that gives you the option of upgrading to 4x1GB in the future. Still, 1GB DIMMs are expensive, so 4x512 isn't a terrible choice. Just realize that unless you really need more than 1GB of RAM, you'll end up with slightly slower performance, as none of the boards we've tested will run with 1T command rates and maximum timings when using four DIMMs.
  • crimson117 - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    If you go for the AMD board, I'd recommend getting 4x512mb ram.
  • crimson117 - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    It is a crime to limit such great systems with a mere 2x512mb of ram.
  • KristopherKubicki - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    arswihart: All motherboard manufacturers do that.

    Kristopher
  • arswihart - Tuesday, May 24, 2005 - link

    that chaintech card is one of the best values in computer hardware, it only has a few downsides, including lack of eq control, no eax (who cares?), can't use microphone input when hi-quality mode (24-bit 96 khz) is enabled, and no spdif in (who needs it?). The Hi-quality 24-bit 96 khz 2-channel mode is what this card is all about, and it is a noticable improvement over onboard audio.

    Regarding the Catalina card, the sound quality of the DAC's on that card are obviously worse than the Chaintech.
  • berkut7 - Monday, May 23, 2005 - link

    My brother owns the Chaintech soundcard, and the drivers do not have an option that allows control of either treble, or more imortantly (he has the Logitech's Z-560 speakers.) Plus, the soundcard doesn't feature any EAX support, but I don't think EAX even does anything to make games sound better.
  • Tujan - Monday, May 23, 2005 - link

    Im a little aprehensive about putting money into Nvidia now.Since there are plenty of other vendors wich have AMD solutions.True Nvidia is the one to best. But it simply cant be an all Nvidia show.

    Your article is most of dealing with what 'cost is for given components.Think that the smarter buyer is purchasing,especially the first time buyer,based on fact of 'future proofing . In a performance based category. The smarter buyer,is buying performance,they are buying cheaper components on a performance upgrade path.

    An example for the AMD setup,a 1.8 Winchester,could be used instead.And too a video card such as an ATI x600pro PCI-e. This shaves about 120.00 off of that notch. A 300+ LCD ? Dont think so. However anyway,the fact is the 'smarter buyer,is taking the cheaper expense,to a platform wich is 'performance.

    I know Ive seen the benchmarks for the different Video cards.It isn't a bragging thing to me.My grandma uses DDRMemory on here video card,with a 400Mhz Ramdac,but she uses it on a PCI-e board.

    The range of performance/platform is a little different for an Intel platform,where processors run from Celerons ,to EM64 Prescotts.Then stop at where we are now,the 945,955/dual core 'boards.But the range of upgrade is there,and its based on performance.The smarter buyer is taking the least expense,for the platform with the longest upgrade range.

    First time buyers are the most luckiest because they do not have to take second chances with their money.

    Would like to see more m-atx performance platforms.Motherboards w/o onboard graphics for example.There are only a few.However this would probably be something 'performance should win,over 'cost analysis.

    Like IDE,IDE went to IDE33 all the way through to UDMA133. Only criteria was the prerequisite of the 40 pin connector on the motherboard.

    Limiting 'range on a 'cost effective analysis is anybodies choice.If there is such a choice.
  • arswihart - Monday, May 23, 2005 - link

    i hope you didn't dump your 8rda+, you should send it to epox I know they will fix your caps or give you a new board

    my caps started bulging as well, without any problems though, but I sent it to Epox anyways and i had another 8rda+ with high-quality caps just over a week after i sent it out. Thats great customer service.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now