General Image Quality

For these pictures, the camera was reset to its factory default setting. Then, it was set to its highest quality recording setting. The pictures were then taken in Auto mode unless stated otherwise. Portrait-style images have been rotated using Irfanview's "lossless operations". Click on a thumbnail to view the full-size image. All images are in sRGB color space.

 
Click to enlarge.
 
Click to enlarge.
 
Click to enlarge.
     

In the first sample above, the image is a bit grainier than what we would like and we noticed some subtle jaggies along diagonal lines. The second sample demonstrates a problem that we found throughout most of our pictures with the 4100. Although the camera can resolve a decent amount of detail, those details tends to be quite soft in appearance. Again, the image is also fairly grainy for a bright outdoor picture. In the third sample, we should note the soft details again as well as some obvious jaggies along diagonal lines.

 
Click to enlarge.
 
Click to enlarge.
 
Click to enlarge.
     

In the first sample above, the tree on the left demonstrates the camera's resolution limit with the appearance of jaggies throughout the fine lines of the limbs. In addition, we noticed some JPEG artifacts on edges in dark areas of the image along with the grainy image quality that we mentioned earlier. The second sample above is a great example of a typical shot with the 4100. Overall detail is decent, but the fine details are muddled with subtle JPEG artifacts, jaggies, and a grainy quality. In the last sample, we found that the 4100 is capable of taking decent macro pictures as close as 1.6" from the lens. However, it took us three tries to get this one in focus. With the other two attempts, the camera mistakenly focused on the background.

Overall, image quality with the 4100 is fairly decent for a point-and-shoot camera. The fine details are fairly soft and we frequently noticed subtle jaggies and JPEG artifacts. While we don't think any of these problems will be a concern for normal-sized prints (4"x6", 5"x7"), they may be noticeable with prints 8"x10" or larger. It's a shame that the Coolpix 4100 can't do a better job producing images with better fine detail, considering its good performance on our resolution chart. We were pleasantly surprised to see that purple fringing is not a major concern with the 4100. In addition, we noticed some very subtle corner blurring, but it was much better than what we expected for a compact digicam.

Night Landscape

 
(Night Landscape, 1.1 sec.)
Click to enlarge.
 

In Night Landscape scene mode, the Coolpix 4100 can take exposures up to 2 seconds in length. In our 1.1 sec. exposure above, there is quite a bit of grain visible throughout the frame. We also noticed vertical banding that is particularly visible in the dark sky. In addition, the image suffers from the same soft details that we had seen in our daylight samples. Overall, we are not too impressed with the night capabilities of this camera.

Movie Mode

 
(640x480, 15 fps)
Click to view.

The Nikon Coolpix 4100 can record video with audio at 640x480, 320x240, or 160x120. With all three resolutions, the camera records video clips at 15 fps as QuickTime MOV files. The duration of a video clip is only limited by the remaining space on the internal memory or flash card. As our sample demonstrates, at 640x480, the quality of the video isn't very good as it is full of compression artifacts. Although this clip isn't the best demonstration, we also discovered that when "Continuous AF" is enabled, the sound of the auto-focus system is recorded in the video clip. To remedy this, you can always select "Single AF" to focus before recording begins. Although the optical zoom is unavailable, the digital zoom can be used. In short, we are fairly disappointed with the video functionality of the Coolpix 4100.

Noise Final Words
Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • stephencaston - Friday, March 11, 2005 - link

    #4: You make a good point. As we are relatively new with digital camera reviews, we are still building our base of comparisons. However, check out the comparison cameras on the testing pages to see the relative performance of similar models we have reviewed.
  • Turin39789 - Friday, March 11, 2005 - link

    In most hardware reviews when a product falls short in terms of quality for its category/price range the article will mention the top performers/best values. This article tells me the nikon 4100 is not for me, but doesnt really point me in the right direction for a better choice.
  • skrivis - Friday, March 11, 2005 - link

    I looked at these, but Nikon USA is offering a rebate of $200 on the Coolpix 5400. (Until 03/31)

    I got much more camera for about $50 more. Total price after rebate was $259.
  • stephencaston - Friday, March 11, 2005 - link

    #1, I think you meant the 4600. At any rate, we are always limited to what is available to us at the time. We certainly intend to look into the entire new line-up of Nikons in the future as they become available to us. Even so, the 4100 is very popular and widely available. Hang tight for the new Nikons...we are eagerly awaiting our chance at reviewing them.

    Stephen
  • buttwhacker - Friday, March 11, 2005 - link

    Its a good thing Anandtech is reviewing cameras but please the next time before you review the cameras make sure they are current coz this one is discontinued.... yeah, discontinued. The replacement for Coolpix 4100 is Coolpix 4900, pretty much the same but with a bigger screen and smaller size, look into that.
    Thanx for the review anyways.
  • woodhamiiltonn - Monday, January 28, 2013 - link

    Nikon Coolpix 4100 is a good camera and you've allocated an informative review of this camera. I enjoyed the camera comparison you've made and I think anyone would be delighted before purchasing Nikon Coolpix 4100. Thanks.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now