OS X and Mobile Usability (and Performance)

My original Mac experience left me enamored with Exposé, a cool looking, yet quite functional, method of viewing all open, visible windows on your desktop at the same time. Given the lower resolution of the PowerBook's display in comparison to that of my desktop LCD, I fully expected myself to use Exposé even more on a notebook. I've actually always found portable notebooks with small screen sizes to be one of the biggest hinderances to mobile productivity, so I was very much looking forward to Exposé on the PowerBook.

Much to my disappointment, I found hitting the F9 - F11 keys on the PowerBook a little far out of reach - reducing the user friendliness of Exposé. The problem is that unlike a desktop keyboard, there is no big gap between the function keys and the rest of the keyboard, thus making it harder to clearly identify and hit the appropriate function key. Here, I finally discovered the true benefit of being able to use window corners to activate Exposé. Now, if I want to Exposé across all open windows, I just move my mouse to the top right corner; Exposé all windows in the active application, move my mouse to the lower right corner, and the lower left corner will show my desktop. If you're not expecting it, Exposé will activate without warning, but I find that activating it accidentally isn't a problem that I run into often (except when other people use the notebook).

The PowerBook is great as a mobile desktop, as long as you've got a desk or a lap to sit it on. Carrying the 5.7 lbs PowerBook around is a bit of a pain. While I had no qualms feathering my 1.7 lbs Sony to meetings, I'd never take the PowerBook to a meeting. Traveling extremely light to a meeting is very important to me and that's one area that the PowerBook just doesn't cut it for me. However, to put this in perspective, the PowerBook is significantly lighter and smaller than any competing PC notebook with a similar sized screen. If you have no problems carrying a 15" Sony or Dell around with you, then the PowerBook is going to feel much lighter and much smaller.

But as a notebook sitting ready for me to get to work back in the hotel room, the PowerBook is perfect. My biggest issue with notebooks is that screen real estate is normally a very limited luxury. However, with the window management and multitasking features like Exposé of Mac OS X, tedious tasks like editing a hundred tradeshow photos on the PowerBook is a breeze.

All of the multitasking benefits that I discovered about OS X in the original article are even more useful on the PowerBook because of your limited screen real estate. I've also discovered the real world benefits of being able to Hide as well as Minimize windows. Minimized windows go in the right side of the Dock, similar to minimized windows under Windows XP. Hidden windows, however, remain hidden until you switch to the application again. At first, I never really understood why you would want to hide a window, until I started dealing with a lot of minimized windows and realized that the majority of them didn't need to be minimized, just hidden from my plain view. For example, my buddy list for my work IM account - when I'm in the middle of a meeting or writing an article, I don't need the buddy list active on my desktop, or minimized and occupying space in the Dock - so, hide it. The same applies to things like download indicators for Newsgroups or BitTorrent; if I'm downloading a lot of things at once, I just keep them hidden and go about my business, and check in on them at a later point in time when I'm not working on anything. What's also useful in situations like this is that the Dock is updated in live, so I can actually glance at what's going on with my Newsgroup downloads just by looking at the Dock. Hiding windows actually ends up being a very useful thing from a window management standpoint on both the desktop and the PowerBook, but is especially useful on the latter because of your limited screen real estate.

A video demonstrating the difference between hiding a window and minimizing. First, the Safari (web browser) window is minimized and goes to the right side of the dock. Then, it is restored by clicking on its icon in the dock. Next, the window is hidden, and the only way to reveal it is by either CMD-TAB (the equivalent of ALT-TAB) or by clicking on the Safari icon in the Dock.

One thing that is plainly obvious, however, is that the single G4 1.5GHz that's in the PowerBook, which I'm testing here today, isn't as good of a multitasker as the dual 2.0GHz G5 system on which I was introduced to OS X. The difference is night and day when doing a lot of things at once, but once again, since you're on a laptop, you generally don't do as much as you would on a desktop. Application start up time is significantly greater on the PowerBook than on the G5, which is due to a combination of the slower processor as well as the much slower laptop hard drive.

The G4 at 1.5GHz is definitely slower than the G5. There's a noticeable performance penalty, but what's interesting is that the notebook seems to be far more disk limited than my desktop G5. I end up noticing the I/O speed a lot more than I notice the CPU speed. This could be for a couple of reasons. For starters, the G4 has much less cache and the notebook itself has much less memory. not to mention that the hard drive in the machine isn't exactly the fastest desktop SATA drive. As far as OS X application performance goes, other than application start up time (especially when starting multiple applications at the same time), the G4 1.5GHz is pretty snappy. Video encoding also takes longer on the PowerBook, but that's for obvious reasons.

Since it's relatively similar in system specs to the PowerBook, I'd assume that the 1.42GHz Mac mini should be equally snappy in general application use, but don't expect it to be a speed demon in HD video editing and encoding. I'm not so sure about the slower 1.25GHz Mac mini, but given that I found the 1.5GHz PowerBook G4 to be mostly I/O limited, I would expect relatively acceptable performance out of the entry-level mini as well.

The 512MB of memory that the PowerBook came outfitted with seems to be the sweet spot for OS X. In the time since the G5 article, I played around with quite a few different memory sizes under OS X, finding that the base 256MB that ships in lower priced PowerBooks and all iMacs is simply not enough. While I praised OS X for excellent caching of the OS and applications, 256MB of memory just doesn't cut it and you end up with far too much disk swapping at that point. But with 512MB, you're pretty much set; for my usage patterns, I'd be disk or CPU bound before needing more than 512MB for what I do on the PowerBook. I'd also say that it would be in Apple's best interest to increase the minimum memory on their systems to 512MB, simply because from their perspective, they need to be convincing users to embrace their platform, and disk swapping is a one way ticket to having users call a system "slow" for their first time using it. You only get one chance to make a first impression, and OS X with 256MB isn't the best impression of the platform.

The average battery life of the 15" PowerBook G4 is quoted at being 4.5 hours. Upon first using the machine on battery, it gave me an expected lifespan of just under 2 hours. It climbed steadily up to 3 hours. I'd say that the realistic battery life for constant use is between 2 - 3 hours on the 1.5GHz 15" PowerBook when using default energy saver settings as well as the integrated 802.11g. Obviously, the less you do, the longer your battery will last, and you can always turn things down to make it last closer to the estimated battery life - but given my usage patterns, the PowerBook is basically 3 hours or less for me. Compared to similarly equipped PC notebooks, I'd say that the PowerBook is competitive, if not a little better. Sony quotes a 2-hour battery life on their K-series of notebooks, while Dell quotes a similar 4.5-hour battery life on their competitive solutions. The Dells generally use much higher capacity batteries (72 Whr vs. 50 Whr for the 15" PowerBook), but also use much higher performance CPUs with higher power consumption.


I'm not overly impressed with the battery life, but I don't think any similar sized notebook would be able to impress me at this point in time. It also doesn't bother me too much, since I mostly use the system near an outlet, and working more than 3 hours straight on a plane where I could be catching up on sleep is usually not in the cards. I do appreciate the presence of a battery life indicator on the battery itself. I also appreciate the power brick, which is similar to the iPod's AC adapter, and thus, quite portable and a good size for carrying around with you. You can also remove the actual plug and replace it with a regular power cable (that also comes with the system) if you are plugging it into a power strip and don't want to occupy more than a single outlet.

The Display and Fiber Optic Keyboard Lighting Final Words
Comments Locked

60 Comments

View All Comments

  • GL - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Another great read! There's not much to take issue with. Now that I have both a desktop and notebook Mac, I find one of the biggest issues is keeping them both in sync (documents and settings). I believe Tiger will solve this annoying task once and for all because Apple will open the .Mac API to third party developers. But until then, I have to rely on some custom scripts that can only sync my documents, but none of the program settings. Has this been an issue for you too?
  • michael2k - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Wow, I didn't know that, DeathB
  • DeathB - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Nice review, Anand.

    But the drag and drop example in the terminal is not a good one, you can do exactly the same thing with Windows command prompt, maybe since win98 old days :) Sure for XP and 2k, but I'm too lazy to check my 98 box.
  • DeathB - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

  • SteveJobs - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Mac Rules!!!
  • SteveJobs - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Nicely done, Anand.
  • OptimisTech - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    I also use a Mac laptop (iBook G4, 15") and a PC for my desk at home. I love the iBook for being on the road. I have recommended the combination to friends. I admit the dreaded "one-button mouse" irks me quite a bit, but I have a little mini-optical mouse that I use almost always, so it's not a big deal. what I wish someone would come up with is a KVM switch that could operate a Mac and a PC happily but wouldn't cost $150. I would think that if mac-mini sales really do well, there would be a pretty good market for something like that.
  • T8000 - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    You should have mentioned the Acer TravelMate 4001WLMi (Centrino 715 based) when comparing with PC notebooks, as that has similar specs, including weight, for under $1250.

    Also, you make mention of screen estate like smaller font size does not bother you. I noticed that lots of older users (40+) find native TFT resolutions hard to read, usually setting 800x600 on 15" TFT screens. Since premium "design" products like Powerbooks are not unlikely to be bought by older users, the current resolution could allready be an issue, raising the question how well interpolation works on this Powerbook.
  • nels0360 - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Nice review. I switched in June 04 to a PowerBook 1.33Ghz 12". I hook it up to a 20" LCD when I'm at my desk.

    One thing I noticed you mentioned alot is disk performance. One of the best upgrades on a PowerBook is the 5400 RPM drive. It really speeds things up. These faster drives will likely be included in the new PowerBook models that are due to be released soon.
  • knitecrow - Monday, January 24, 2005 - link

    Thanks for the link #4. iBook sales were up, but powerbook sales have been down.

    PowerBook numbers lagged in fourth place, a reflection of the fact that the pro laptops haven't been refreshed since last April. 152,000 units were shipped last quarter for $307 million in sales, numbers that were down 29 and 27 percent sequentially and 22 and 23 percent year-over-year.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now