Test Setup


 Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s): AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (2.4GHz) Socket 939
RAM: 2 x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2
Hard Drive(s): Seagate 120GB 7200 RPM IDE (8MB Buffer)
Video AGP & IDE Bus Master Drivers: SiS 1.17e
VIA 4in1 Hyperion 4.51 (12-02-2003)
nVidia nForce 6.11 Beta (nForce4)
nVidia nForce Platform Driver 4.24 (nForce3 Ultra)
Video Card(s): nVidia 6800 Ultra (AGP 8X)
nVidia 6800 Ultra (PCI Express)
Video Drivers: nVidia nForce 61.77 (SiS, VIA, nF3U, Intel 925X)
nVidia nForce 61.81 Beta (nForce4)
Operating System(s): Windows XP Professional SP1
Motherboards: Winfast 755FXK8AA (SiS 755FX)
Soltek K8TPro-939 (VIA K8T800 PRO)
Epox 9NDA3+ (nForce3 Ultra)
nVidia nForce4 Ultra Reference Board
Abit AV8 PRO (VIA K8T800 PRO)
ECS KV2 Extreme (VIA K8T800 PRO)
Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 (nVidia nForce3 Ultra)
MSI K8N Neo2 (nVidia nForce3 Ultra)
MSI K8T Neo2 (VIA K8T800 PRO)

Tests used OCZ PC3200 Platinum Rev. 2, which uses Samsung TCCD chips. All memory ran at 2-2-2-10 timing in all benchmarks.

Since the nVidia 6800 Ultra AGP was used for testing in the 939 chipset, we used the 6800 Ultra AGP for benchmarking the Winfast. The PCI Express 6800 Ultra was used for all testing with the nForce4 and the Reference Intel 925X. Resolution in all benchmarks is 1024x768x32 unless noted otherwise.

Results for the SiS 755FX based Winfast are color-coded red in all graphs. VIA K8T800 Pro based motherboards are displayed in green in our results, and nVidia nForce4/nForce3 are in orange. Intel results are included for Reference only and are blue in the graphs. The color coding should allow easy comparison of the tested Winfast 755FXK8AA to other chipsets and processors.

Memory Stress Testing General Performance & Encoding
Comments Locked

29 Comments

View All Comments

  • nserra - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    The sis chipsets are very good, with the right bios configuration and drivers will do well. At least my ME and XP installation is already 3 years old and didn’t have to reinstall them because of problems.

    The biggest Sis problem is that the mobo maker’s dont use good quality components on the (sis) boards, at the same level of the intel based ones. When every one says intel is the best, or that sis sucks, etc... Take that into account OK.

    I noted the Soltek comes on top too many times, I wonder why is that, especially over the other ones, maybe they are socket 754 based?

    #6 I had the same problem you have, and now it is solved. The startup time is really fast, not as fast as the ME, but good :)
  • jmke - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    Why is DOOM3 (opengl) in the DX9 gaming category? ;)
  • Gnoad - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    Any word on if it would be capable if running above 233 if a program like clockgen was used?
  • Calin - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    I have bought a ECS K7S5A with SIS 735 chipset. It is still working, and is going good (except a very long startup time in WinXP).
    I won't stay away from SiS chipsets, especially at that price point for a mainboard
  • FFS - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    Ooops...
    missed t in "Switzerland" Sorry...
  • FFS - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    Good article... hope to see more boards in retail...
    Competition is very good.
    SiS 755 was very good... in reviews...
    But we never could find any SiS mobo in the shops (at least in Swizerland)
    But I just do not trust SiS after I had way too many problems with SiS 648 (also was very good in reviews at it's time)

    But check this out:
    nSISt on nVIDIA

    I a not a fun of nVIDIA although nF3 Ultra looks very atractive to me (nF4 not, since I have already good 6800GT AGP board...)

    Well, too bad that Intel do not make chipsets for AMD... :)))
  • Poser - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    In the article he wrote, "The board is also a 3-phase design, instead of the 2-phase that we often see on boards designed to a price point" which made me wonder -- what's the difference? Both in a technical sense, and in a performance sense. Does the number of phases a board uses have any influence on what's the best power supply to mate it with, or am I wandering off in the wrong direction entirely? Anyone have a good link where I could dig a bit deeper?
  • esun - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    Wow, this board looks like an excellent value. Here's hoping that they'll fix those minor problems, and perhaps I'll pick one up myself.
  • Saist - Thursday, December 16, 2004 - link

    just wanted to comment that I picked up ECS's 755-A2 board some time back and it is now pretty much the value board that I pick when someone doesn't want to shell out $100+ for a mother board. I'm pretty much pleased to see that SiS is continuing this with the 755FX. Hopefully it will mean a Socket 939 A64 will be joining the 3 current 754 boards.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now