Battlefield Vietnam Performance

The Battlefield series continues to be popular; with no built-in benchmark, we're forced to develop a benchmark by starting a multi-player game in the Quang Tri 1972 level and manually navigate through a path using FRAPS to record the average frame rate.

We kept all of the settings at high except for the graphics detail slider, which we had to keep at low in order to provide a true "apples to apples" comparison between all of the cards here. The standings will remain the same at higher detail settings; the frame rates will simply be lower.

The X700 continues to dominate performance here, outperforming the GeForce 660 by 32%. In the lower end of things, the X600 Pro and the GeForce 6200 are pretty much neck and neck, with the X300 clearly falling behind.

Battlefield Vietnam - Quang Tri 1972 Bench

The rest of the resolution picture isn't much different from what we've already shown you:



Notes from the Lab

ATI X600 Pro: Mouse isn't as laggy, but still laggy enough, especially at 12x10.

ATI X700: This continues to dominate performance here as well.

NVIDIA GeForce 6200: The mouse speed is erratic in the menus before you enter a game. The card isn't really considered "fast", but smooth at 800x600.

NVIDIA GeForce 6600: Performance is much better than the 6200, and the mouse still lags in the menu for some reason. This card plays the game nice and fast.

Intel Integrated Graphics: At 800x600, it actually plays and looks pretty decent. Graphics quality always defaults to lowest for some reason. The mouse is surprisingly not as laggy as on the NV cards.

Unreal Tournament 2004 Performance Halo Performance
Comments Locked

44 Comments

View All Comments

  • MemberSince97 - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link

    OT, I wonder about the outcome for us 6800 owners and the VP... Nvidia screamed this new feature to us and I bought it . Will this end in a class action,or perhaps some kind of voucher for people that bought the 6800 specifically for this highly touted feature....
  • Lonyo - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link

    Why is there no X300 in the CS: Source stress test?
    It seems oddly missing, and with no comment as to why...
  • projecteda - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link

    x700 > 9800 Pro?
  • NesuD - Monday, October 11, 2004 - link

    there is some kind of error concerning your max power graph and this statement.

    "other than the integrated graphics solution, the 6200 is the lowest power card here - drawing even less power than the X300,"

    the graph clearly shows the 6200 drawing 117 watts while the x300 is shown drawing 110 watts. Just thought i would point that out.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now