General Performance and Encoding


Content Creation Performance

General Usage Performance

General Performance

MPEG-4 Encoding Performance - 'Sum of All Fears' Ch. 9

The DFI is one of the better performers among the Socket 754 boards in Content Creation, Business Winstone, and PCMark 2004. All of the boards are close at stock speeds. AutoGK is a newer benchmark at AnandTech, so the comparisons to the socket 939 FX53 were the only results available. We would expect encoding results with the 2.0GHz single-channel 3200+ with 1024k cache (or the 2.2GHz 512k alternate)to be much lower than the dual channel 2.4GHz FX53 with 1024k cache.

Performance Test Configuration: DFI LANParty UT nF3 250Gb DX9 Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

54 Comments

View All Comments

  • ciwell - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    "Overclocking for Dummies"

    I like the sound of that! :D
  • punko - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    Impressive Article !

    Can't wait for the first edition of Anantech's "Overclocking for Dummies"
    as the whole concept of FSB and memory tweaking both interests and scares me.

    Now if only I could justify to the wife retiring my current rig . . .
  • gimper48 - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    So when is the next overclockers guide? Can we expect to see this board in it?
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    #1 - The Asus K8N-E will be included in a roundup of new 754 boards in the next week.

    #2,#4 - Corrections made

    #7 - The final correct name of the series is LANParty UT, as you point out. The name has been corrected in the article. DFI considered many last minute changes - from full LANParty to bargain board. Final decisions were quite recent.

    #9 - We received this production board by Express shipment direct from Taiwan on September 1, after several delays. We are told by DFI that this is the production board. DFI, like other manufacturers, will likely make further improvements during the production run.
  • mikedustin - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    I've been waiting for this board for a long time, only one problem I have with it, why did they pick yellow? I was wanting UV green. :(

    Oh well, I hope it will match my green case anyway.

    DFI is on the right track as a mobo maker, this board is just another big win for them.
  • tomati - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    I have read in other forum that DFI have postpose the 2 september to the 9 because of last change in the design board , so can I expect the same result as yours ?

    (you told about the pre version , right?)
  • tomati - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

  • geoff2k - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    Any reason that the review calls the board the "Lanparty UL NF3 250GB" and DFI's own site calls it the "Lanparty UT NF3 250GB"?

  • Ecmaster76 - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    Talking about weak SATA connectors...

    I just built a Shuttle XPC for a friend and it had custom SATA connectors on the board and (slightly) custom cables that make things a lot better. The board connector is a lot like a USB socket, it has an outer support ring with the original SATA data pins in the center (its backward compatible). The cable has added bits on it that make it snap into the board connector. No more accidentally pulle cable. I wish the SATA mechanical specs would be revised to such a system or something similar. The electrical aspects of SATA are awesome but they didn't put much though into the connectors.
  • kmmatney - Wednesday, September 8, 2004 - link

    "We were also able to complete stress testing at 300x8 with 2.5-3-4-10 memory timings. At that speed of 2.4Ghz at DDR600, we achieved the following results:
    Quake 3 - 474.0
    Return to Castle Wolfenstein-Enemy Territory-Radar - 104.3 "

    So...with overclocking the you saw the following increases?

    Quake 3: 411 up to 474
    Wolf-ET: 70 up to 104.3

    Wow....


Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now