Standard Workstation Performance


High End Workstation Performance

High End Workstation Performance

High End Workstation Performance

High End Workstation Performance

High End Workstation Performance

High End Workstation Performance

The anomaly in the SPECviewperf suite turned out to be the nVidia Reference board, which we found in our Reference Board review to perform much better in the workstation benchmarks with an nVidia graphics card. Throughout the Reference Board benches, we see the new VIA K8T800 PRO and nVidia nForce3-250 motherboards performing about the same in SPECviewperf with no standout among the 5 new boards. The one interesting result, which we've seen before, is that the VIA chipset performs a bit slower than nVidia in the DRV test. Otherwise, there is little separating the performance of any of the 5 boards.

Some of you might wish for more variation in performance, but while these boards are new with updated chipsets and new features, in general, the chipsets are mature, and the same on-CPU memory controller is being tested in all the benchmarks. This leaves features and the opportunity for increased performance with overclocking as the primary targets for differentiating the 5 boards.

Standard Gaming Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • intercollector - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    I'm a little surprised to see why the MSI K8N didn't get the gold compared to the Epox. Both seem almost identical in every way, except that the K8N seems to include Firewire. Shouldn't this feature make it surpass the Epox board?

    The only downside of the MSI board seems to be the limit of a 300 max FSB, which is probably fine for 99.99% of overclockers.
  • Klaasman - Saturday, May 29, 2004 - link

    #7-
    Thanks for link, but my KV8 Pro still wont boot when selecting "fixed" in bios setup.
    Why wouldn't my board have the pro chip? Manufacturing screw up maybe?
  • Wesley Fink - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    #6 -
    Bank Interleaving is not an option in any of the BIOS' tested here. Many current BIOS enable Bank interleaving by default. Where it is an option, we definitely enable the best interleaving option available and list what we set in the memory chart. We are not ignoring this option.
  • bigtoe33 - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    If you are looking for the latest Abit KV8 pro bios have a look here. http://www.bleedinedge.com/download/bios/abit%20am...

    multi support and PCI lock inc. if your pro board won't lock the pci bus with this bios then your board may not have the pro chipset.
  • Myrandex - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    Well after finishing the article, I was wondering why none of the boards are run with bank interleaving on? Doesn't it increase memory performance for the ones that support it?
  • Myrandex - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    On the KV8 spec page, it states:
    Onboard USB 2.0/IEEE-1394 8 USB 2.0 ports supported by nF3-250
    No FireWire

    Should be K8T800 Pro instead of nF3-250.
  • Myrandex - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

  • Klaasman - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    What revision of KV8 Pro were you using and what bios version?
    Nobody else with a recently purchased KV8 can get the locks to work. How come your board does?
  • Aikouka - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    Anandtech should have looked at the problem that the Chaintech VNF3-250 has with it's RAID and installing an OS, and the problem where the board refuses to boot from SATA if you enable RAID on any IDE HDDs. People've said they've been able to circumvent it, but I haven't got it to work yet, and Chaintech is worthless when it comes to customer service. I received an automated response about 6 or 7 days after my initial submission on their website (they have no US phone number.) And I still have not received an email from a representative yet.
  • RyanVM - Friday, May 28, 2004 - link

    If there's so little variation in system performance between these, why not look at other aspects like USB throughput/CPU utilization, IDE/SATA throughput, ethernet throughput/CPU utilization, etc.

    Ace's Hardware just did a great article showing that the rather crummy components being used these days on cheaper motherboards have a pretty large impact in performance in those areas.
    http://www.aceshardware.com/read.jsp?id=65000298

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now