Conclusion

OCZ is breaking new ground with their latest Enhanced Bandwidth series. Many readers will likely find it disturbing that their long-held beliefs that the lowest CAS is always the best performer is no longer completely true. Based on the results we see with OCZ 3500EB, you will now need to look deeper than CAS timings to evaluate memory performance.

In general, 3500EB performed exactly as OCZ claimed it would in our benchmarks. It is not as fast as some current CAS 2 memory at DDR400, but its performance is very close to the best, even though EB is rated at CAS 2.5. However, by the time we reached the DDR433 to DDR466 range, 3500EB performed neck-and-neck with the best memory that we have tested, even though the CAS latency was slower. By the time we reached DDR500, OCZ 3500EB was reaching the highest bandwidth we have yet seen at DDR500, even though it ran at CAS 3 and the other fast memories were at CAS 2.5. It appears that the more you overclock 3500EB, the greater the impact of the EB optimizations.

The other surprising finding is that this DDR433 module has no problem at all running at DDR500 and providing the best performance we have measured at that frequency. In fact, we were able to reach a stable DDR510 with a memory rated at DDR433. Perhaps OCZ should use EB to also stand for Extended Bandwidth because we have never seen a DDR433 memory capable of performance at these DDR500+ speeds.

There are other memories that perform well in the same DDR400-510 range as OCZ 3500EB. At the DDR400-454 range, Mushkin 3200 2-2-2 Special performs well. Across the entire DDR400-510 range, OCZ 3700 Gold Rev.2 and Kingmax DDR500 are neck-and-neck. Also, Corsair XMS4000 PRO, Mushkin 4000 High Performance, and OCZ 4200EL perform well across the same range and reach even higher frequencies than OCZ 3500EB. However, all-in-all, there is no memory we have tested that can deliver the kind of extended and enhanced bandwidth we have found in our tests of 3500EB.

Certainly the six memories we listed are the best we have tested so far that you can still buy. OCZ 3500EB belongs in that list, if your motherboard can support the required memory voltage of about 2.8V. You should look at these 6 carefully to determine what best meets your needs. However, all 6 are also among the most expensive memories available from each memory manufacturer - except for OCZ 3500EB. OCZ has priced all EB memory at about 10% less than the other top OCZ memory products. 3500EB is also designed to be more compatible with fast performance timings on nForce2/3 and VIA AMD chipsets, so you should definitely look closely at OCZ 3500EB for an Athlon or Athlon 64 motherboard.

EB is an interesting and successful technology for OCZ. You should definitely add it to your short list if you are looking for DDR memory. For the broad range of DDR400 to DDR510, 3500EB is a remarkable performer.

Test Results: Memory Timings & Bandwidth Comparison
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pumpkinierre - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    Yeah well I have had OCZ platinum 3200 o'clocked to 3500 (2-2-3-7) for 9months now and noticed it slowly degrading. I used to pass Memtest86 at 220MHz with Game Accelerator (GAT) F1 (Abit IC7-G) but now I have to switch off the GAT at 216MHz to successfully run Memtest86. At F1, DDR Voltage is 2.7V otherwise 2.6V. I notice the mem. modules are quite warm (even hot) so maybe I need extra cooling as the DIMMS are out of the normal air circulation at the top of the case. And its been a hot summer.

    It seems crazy that memory modules that are at least 12 months old (BH5/BH6) are still the best performers in the 400 to 433MHz range and even higher (original OCZ3700 gold) given the very fast ascent from 266 to 400 at low latencies. Lets hope these Hynix DDR550 modules cut the mustard.

    I cant run F1 higher than CAS2 at present (and Street Racer not at all) although others in posts say they do. So finally Wesley, will the EB technology modules run F1 or Street Racer at 466-500Mhz.


  • johnsonx - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    It might have been interesting to set CAS latency on the other modules to 2.5 to see how much this 'EB' helps vs. non-EB ram at identical timings.

    This article also simply seems to show (again) that OCZ memory, of any sort, is just plain good. Recall the article on the FX-53, wherein the 2.4Ghz chip with OCZ ram performed more than 200Mhz better than the 2.2Ghz FX-51 with Mushkin RAM... this even though the Mushkin had better timings.

    Were I shopping for high performance RAM, my shopping would begin and end with OCZ... it'd just be a matter of choosing which OCZ modules.
  • Cybercat - Wednesday, April 7, 2004 - link

    Well....this is new....and impressive.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now